The Germ Theory...

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote

<snip>

Quoted message said:

We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society exists to
cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a day on its
mandate. We have become accustomed to headlines announcing
a "cancer breakthrough".

Yeah, that's the one-way media for you.

Quoted message said:

These headlines have been occurring since 1924 and yet the
incidence of cancer has steadily increased. In 1924 cancer
was the 8th leading cause of death, has now become the
second lead cause of death and is predicted to become the
number one leading cause of death in North America.

That might have something to do with people living
longer, maybe certain cancers are more likely to appear
later in life.

Quoted message said:

It appears the germ theory has failed as an approach to
improve our health.

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Allopathic medicine is based on monomorphism or the
germ theory.

1. All medicine other than true homeopathy is allopathic --
herbalism, naturopathy, TCM.

Even chiropactic. Yet it appears to be chiropractors who
resurrected this arachaic term in modern times to make it
look as though modern scientific medicine was merely one of
many broadly equivalent theories of illness. If you can make
proper medicine look smaller, nonsense may not look so bad.
(I refer to the chiropractic theory that the spine is the
key to all illness)

But modern medicine is a transparently eclectic and
empirical discipline, not driven by philosophical leanings,
or any single theory. Thus if highly improbable rays that
cannot be seen or felt, and that will pass through solid
matter can be shown to help make diagnoses and treat some
illnesses, medicine will use them (xrays). It picked the
eyes out of herbalism, and even found a lot of previously
unknown herbal products that are useful in cancer treatment.
It has tried out snake venom in treating clotting disorders.
It has provided everything that that we really know for sure
about nutrition, including about vitamins, minerals, and
caloric requirements. It alone has tried to grapple with the
mysteries of the human psyche and its relationship to
various illnesses, and been able to correct mistakes in its
own attribution of illness to psychological causes. It alone
tests everything out critically as it goes, thus avoiding
the thrall of the innumerable false hypotheses that prevail
within homeopathy and allopathic forms of alternative
medicine..

This list could go on forever. I could also list what I see
as its faults as it is applied in practice. These do
overlap the complaints of AM suporters, but that discussion
lies elsewhere.

2. If this statement is true, why can one look at any
medical textbook and find that infective illnesses take
up less than a fifth? What happened to the usual list of
known causes of illness that extends into hundreds?

Having created this monumental straw man this piece goes on
to prove is that many alt writers don't know zip about real
medicine and never care to do any real research before they
open their mouths.

(# allopathy (allo=-other)was a term Hannemann, the founder
of homeopathy, coined to refer to medical treatments that
contrast in some way from the "like cures like" princicple
of homeopathy. According to that principle an effective
medical treatment had to be able to produce symptoms similar
to the disease or illness it is intended to treat.

Yes, I know it is silly, but two hundred years ago everyone
was casting around for some overall guiding principle that
would govern medical treatment. Superstition and religious
ideations dominated. No one knew how complex human pathology
would turn out to be. )

Peter Moran

Quoted message said:

Subject: The Germ Theory...
From: "Dave Wickware" [email hidden]
Date: 5/7/04 7:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

You are now getting to the truth of it.

Modern medicine known as Western Medicine, the Medicine of
the Americans, or Allopathic medicine is one grand
DECEPTION. It is all smoke and mirrors.

Orthopathy, Greek for "truth in disease" was started in 1822
in the US and is a true American Theory of Disease. You see,
it is not disease ( that is the deception ) it is dis-ease,
the body is not at ease, the body is not in homeostasis.

This was later confirmed by A. Bechamp with his microzyma
theory which proved Pasteur was a con artist ( circa 1870).
However, due to Pasteur's prominence, Pasteur was able to
hide the truth and keep the microzyma theory covered up.

Rosenow proved that bacteria are pleomorphic in 1914 in a
peer reviewed journal. Yet his data is ignored just as
Bechamp's data was ignored by those profitting from the
false concept of the germ.

Yep, the germ theory of disease is a con, a deception, but
one heck of a money making gimmick.

DrC PhD

This is very interesting, but how is it proposed that dis-
ease is transmitted from one person to another in proximity?

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040507190302.16730.00000881@mb-
m12.aol.com...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: The Germ Theory... From: "Dave Wickware"
[email hidden] Date: 5/7/04 7:44 AM Eastern
Daylight Time Message-id:
<[email hidden]>

You are now getting to the truth of it.

Modern medicine known as Western Medicine, the Medicine of
the Americans,

or

Quoted message said:

Allopathic medicine is one grand DECEPTION. It is all
smoke and mirrors.

Orthopathy, Greek for "truth in disease" was started in
1822 in the US and

is a

Quoted message said:

true American Theory of Disease. You see, it is not
disease ( that is the deception ) it is dis-ease, the body
is not at ease, the body is not in homeostasis.

This was later confirmed by A. Bechamp with his microzyma
theory which

proved

Quoted message said:

Pasteur was a con artist ( circa 1870). However, due to
Pasteur's

prominence,

Quoted message said:

Pasteur was able to hide the truth and keep the microzyma
theory covered

up.

Quoted message said:

Rosenow proved that bacteria are pleomorphic in 1914 in a
peer reviewed journal. Yet his data is ignored just as
Bechamp's data was ignored by

those

Quoted message said:

profitting from the false concept of the germ.

Yep, the germ theory of disease is a con, a deception, but
one heck of a

money

Quoted message said:

making gimmick.

DrC PhD

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Doe said:

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote

<snip>

Quoted message said:

We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society exists
to cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a day on its
mandate. We have become accustomed to headlines
announcing a "cancer breakthrough".

Yeah, that's the one-way media for you.

Quoted message said:

These headlines have been occurring since 1924 and yet
the incidence of cancer has steadily increased. In 1924
cancer was the 8th leading cause of death, has now become
the second lead cause of death and is predicted to become
the number one leading cause of death in North America.

That might have something to do with people living
longer, maybe certain cancers are more likely to appear
later in life.

In general, cancer is a disease of old age, the increase in
childhood cancers notwithstanding.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

"Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in
"]news:[email hidden]
s.com.au:

Quoted message said:

treatment. It has tried out snake venom in treating
clotting disorders. It has provided everything that that
we really know for

That always reminds me of the fact that a little over two-and-a-
half years ago, I was lying, bored out of my skull, in a
hospital bed with a bottle of synthetic rattlesnake venom
(Integrellin) running into an IV, all because one Saturday I
had a persistent annoying, but hardly painful, sensation in
my chest. Yes, I fulfilled the stereotype and eventually
drove myself to the ER (or do you call it "casualty"?) after
getting a little worried (I nearly walked out and drove back
home after waiting 10 minutes for someone to show up at the
desk). I got a little scared when the initial bloodwork came
back and the response was to offer me an aspirin (knowing
that by 2001, ASA was mostly used as a platelet aggregation
inhibitor rather than an analgesic).

Despite my liberal political leanings, I have to strongly
disagree with those who complain that US Vice President [censored]
Cheney's most recent MI was "covered up"; my *PERSONAL
EXPERIENCE* tells me that it takes at least a day or so to
properly diagnose a non-Q-wave MI. And throughout the whole
thing (admitted Saturday, discharged Thursday, after an
angiogram/angioplasty/stenting on Wednesday, during which it
was observed that my LAD was 80% blocked) I never *felt* bad
(the annoying sensation disappeared on the first day; if I
didn't have a half-decent grasp of A&P, I'd have been
demanding to leave). Subjective evaluations of health status
often fall flat.

(Weird stuff: on the first day, I had a nitroglycerin patch,
which did *not* result in any headache or other typical side
effects, although I was warned of them, and which to this
day I cannot tell whether or not it affected my "pain."
During the catheterization (oh, speaking of a different sort
of catheter, I got a Foley and was subsequently told I
should have got a Texas; urination after removal was far
less painful than I expected) I got a rather pleasant buzz
from the IV sedation, which I was told was merely Versed
(midazolam), which almost nobody regards as pleasant and
which is supposed to be seriously anamnestic. I can remember
just about all of the procedure (the memories mostly
involving relief that the blockage could be resolved
percutaneously). I can only guess that it was actually
fentanyl+midazolam, with me having an atypical response to
the latter. The day after discharge, I became quite
cognizant of the benefits of uninterrupted sleep and the
detriments of the lack of such; on more than one occasion, I
had asked the MICU/CCU staff to either tone it down or close
my door, typically around 3 AM).

In article <[email hidden]>,

Dave Wickware said:

Allopathic medicine is based on monomorphism or the germ
theory. Disease is an invasion by an outside force, inury,
metabolic defect or organism. The battle cry is "kill the
germ, burn the germ, cut the germ out."

No, *infectious* disease is based on the germ theory.
Noninfectious diseases, like muscular dystrophy, are not.

Quoted message said:

The germ theory has served as the basis for traditional
Western medicine for over a century and was created by man.

And has served brilliantly.

Quoted message said:

The alternative healing approach is based on plemorphic
theory. Create an environment of balance in the body that
will not support any invading microorganism. The concept of
harmony and balance is a God-given protection that exists
naturally at the time of our birth.

But apparently not before or after that instant. Even
embryos can get cancer. And they can suffer birth defects if
the mother gets, say, rubella at the wrong time.

Quoted message said:

If we consider the success of the germ theory in the
"fight" against cancer, we get a representative picture of
the effectiveness of the narrow view.

Ah, I see. Spammin' Dave Wickware is once again spouting
nonsense. Nobody claims that most cancers are caused by
germs. (Some are, like cervical cancer, but most are not.)

Quoted message said:

Cancer is not a localized disturbance. You do not contract
cancer of the elbow, or toe. When you have cancer diagnosed
it is of the whole body.

Sure it is. That's why you can have a basal cell carcinoma
sliced off and be fine for the rest of your life -- because
your whole body is compromised.

The trouble with morons like Spammin' Dave is that they (a)
don't realize how ignorant they are, and (b) don't realize
that most other people are not that ignorant.

Quoted message said:

People constantly have the part removed where the cancer
manifested and have it return elsewhere at a later time. If
you remove the elbow without changing the environment, the
cancer will eventually manifest elsewhere.

That depends on whether the cancer has spread already at
the time it is removed. If I kill a single fly in my house,
no problem; if the fly has already laid eggs, I still have
a problem.

Quoted message said:

We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society exists to
cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a day on its
mandate. We have become accustomed to headlines announcing
a "cancer breakthrough". These headlines have been
occurring since 1924 and yet the incidence of cancer has
steadily increased.

Only some of them. And you have to adjust for the age of the
population to know whether things are getting worse or not.

Quoted message said:

In 1924 cancer was the 8th leading cause of death, has
now become the second lead cause of death and is
predicted to become the number one leading cause of death
in North America.

Which has nothing to do with "germs," Spammin' Dave, you
incredible moron.

And cancer has become so significant only because other
causes have been driven down so far. Why don't you tell us
what the ten leading causes of death were in 1924?

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: The Germ Theory... From: "Dave Wickware"
[email hidden] Date: 5/7/04 7:44 AM Eastern
Daylight Time Message-id:
<[email hidden]>

You are now getting to the truth of it.

Modern medicine known as Western Medicine, the Medicine of
the Americans,

or

Quoted message said:

Allopathic medicine is one grand DECEPTION. It is all
smoke and mirrors.

Orthopathy, Greek for "truth in disease" was started in
1822 in the US and

is a

Quoted message said:

true American Theory of Disease. You see, it is not
disease ( that is the deception ) it is dis-ease, the body
is not at ease, the body is not in homeostasis.

This was later confirmed by A. Bechamp with his microzyma
theory which

proved

Quoted message said:

Pasteur was a con artist ( circa 1870). However, due to
Pasteur's

prominence,

Quoted message said:

Pasteur was able to hide the truth and keep the microzyma
theory covered

up.

Quoted message said:

Rosenow proved that bacteria are pleomorphic in 1914 in a
peer reviewed journal. Yet his data is ignored just as
Bechamp's data was ignored by

those

Quoted message said:

profitting from the false concept of the germ.

Yep, the germ theory of disease is a con, a deception, but
one heck of a

money

Quoted message said:

making gimmick.

The history of medicine is fascinating (when you look at
what people really said. )

You can read Bechamp's work at the site below. So far as I
can gather, he did not dispute the existence of germs and
other microorganism such as yeast, and actually often uses
the term "germ". He was aware of the microsopic studies of
Virchow and Leuwenhock demonstrating them, and understood
that the experiments of Pasteur and others on fermentation
proved the existence of airborne germs that could be
destroyed by heat of creosote. The preface is wrong when it
says Pasteur continued to believe in spontaneous generation
and Bechamp argued against it - Pasteuris the one mainly
given credit for disproving that theory.

He also understood that syphillis, typhoid and cholera could
be transmitted from patient to patient, but argued correctly
that these could not be transmitted by airborne germs.

He merely tried to argue that fermentation and other
activities of microrganisms were due to microorganisms
secreting particulate bodies he called zymas. He thought he
could see these under the microscope. His observations are
completely explained by the enzymic activity of
microorganisms and the prevalence of artefact in the crude
early days of microscsopy.

Pleomorphism was an idea proposed by by Rife and Livingstone-
Wheeler, but there is no evidence at all that bacteria can
change into other bacteria, and a lot against.

sumeria.netblood.htmlOpen ↗

Peter Moran

Quoted message said:

DrC PhD

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Yeh I often wonder HOW my grandfather's TB transmitted to
my kid brother, who then spent almost two years (1947 &
1948 )in a TB sanitorium in Pontiac, MI between the age of
5 & 7 just because he lived with us in the 1940ties. Must
have been a coincidence.

Bad genetics.

You are stating that the "germ theory" is false and yet
present no other alternative. Now I realize that this does
not make your statement false but people need alternative
theories to accept something else.

Perhaps this is a shortcoming of the inquisitive human
mind. Offered any theory, in the lack of another one, they
have no choice but to believe the one offered, regardless
of how silly.

Have a great one!

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040507225845.07718.00000371@mb-
m24.aol.com...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: The Germ Theory... From: "Gymmy Bob"
[email hidden] Date: 5/7/04 8:45 PM Eastern Daylight
Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

This is very interesting, but how is it proposed that dis-
ease is transmitted from one person to another in
proximity?

How does a con-artist con?

A child may believe in Santa Claus. An adult knows better,
but he believes in germs. A well educated and informed
person knows that germs, as such, do not

exist,

Quoted message said:

but how do you convince a decieved adult human? Difficult
problem.

You first must accept the possiblilty that the germ theory
of disease is

false.

Quoted message said:

You must then look for other answers. The answers are
there. The answers exist in the published literature. The
answers exist in the writings and

the

Quoted message said:

journals of those doctors who knew the truth.

It is not an easy journey.

Common sense, some knowledge of chemistry and physiology
and maybe, some pharmacology, will lead you to the truth.

If you can ever accept the dis-ease truth, you will know
that no sick

human can

Quoted message said:

make a healthy human sick, regardless of the proximity. If
a sick human

could

Quoted message said:

really make a healthy human sick, the last profession you
would choose

would

Quoted message said:

be....MEDICINE.

Good luck,

DrC PhD

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Doe said:

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote

<snip>

Quoted message said:

We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society exists
to cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a day on
its mandate. We have become accustomed to headlines
announcing a "cancer breakthrough".

Yeah, that's the one-way media for you.

Quoted message said:

These headlines have been occurring since 1924 and yet
the incidence of cancer has steadily increased. In 1924
cancer was the 8th leading cause of death, has now
become the second lead cause of death and is predicted
to become the number one leading cause of death in
North America.

That might have something to do with people living
longer, maybe certain cancers are more likely to appear
later in life.

In general, cancer is a disease of old age, the increase
in childhood cancers notwithstanding.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

David, did you work hard to become so ignorant?

"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

You are stating that the "germ theory" is false and yet
present no other alternative. Now I realize that this does
not make your statement false

but

Quoted message said:

people need alternative theories to accept something else.

And I guess you would also like an explanation of why you
should accept the assertions being made. IOW what the
evidence actually shows.

Peter Moran

Quoted message said:

Perhaps this is a shortcoming of the inquisitive human
mind. Offered any theory, in the lack of another one, they
have no choice but to believe the one offered, regardless
of how silly.

Have a great one!

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040507225845.07718.00000371@mb-
m24.aol.com...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: The Germ Theory... From: "Gymmy Bob"
[email hidden] Date: 5/7/04 8:45 PM Eastern
Daylight Time Message-id: <KL-
[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

This is very interesting, but how is it proposed that
dis-ease is transmitted from one person to another in
proximity?

How does a con-artist con?

A child may believe in Santa Claus. An adult knows
better, but he believes in germs. A well educated and
informed person knows that germs, as such, do not

exist,

Quoted message said:

but how do you convince a decieved adult human?
Difficult problem.

You first must accept the possiblilty that the germ
theory of disease is

false.

Quoted message said:

You must then look for other answers. The answers are
there. The

answers

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

exist in the published literature. The answers exist in
the writings

and

Quoted message said:

the

Quoted message said:

journals of those doctors who knew the truth.

It is not an easy journey.

Common sense, some knowledge of chemistry and physiology
and maybe, some pharmacology, will lead you to the
truth.

If you can ever accept the dis-ease truth, you will know
that no sick

human can

Quoted message said:

make a healthy human sick, regardless of the proximity.
If a sick human

could

Quoted message said:

really make a healthy human sick, the last profession
you would choose

would

Quoted message said:

be....MEDICINE.

Good luck,

DrC PhD

Troll.

"thisisfun" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Path: bgtnsc04-
ed!worldnet.att.net!208.48.142.85!newsfeed.news2me.com!sn-
xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-
01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From:
"thisisfun" <[email hidden]> Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative Subject: Re: The Germ Theory...
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 08:23:59 -0500 Organization: Posted
via Supernews, supernews.comsupernews.comOpen ↗ Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> Reply-To: "thisisfun"
<[email hidden]> References:
<[email hidden]>
<[email hidden]>
<[email hidden]> X-Priority:
3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft
Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By
Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Complaints-To:
[email hidden] Lines: 37 Xref: wnmaster11
misc.health.alternative:379486 X-Received-Date: Sat, 08
May 2004 13:16:29 GMT (bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Doe said:

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote

<snip>

> We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society
> exists to cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a
> day on its mandate. We have become accustomed to
> headlines announcing a "cancer breakthrough".

Yeah, that's the one-way media for you.

> These headlines have been occurring since 1924 and yet
> the incidence of cancer has steadily increased. In
> 1924 cancer was the 8th leading cause of death, has
> now become the second lead cause of death and is
> predicted to become the number one leading cause of
> death in North America.

That might have something to do with people living
longer, maybe certain cancers are more likely to appear
later in life.

In general, cancer is a disease of old age, the increase
in childhood cancers notwithstanding.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These
are my opinions only, but they're almost always
correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is
because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal
Abelson, MIT)

David, did you work hard to become so ignorant?

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Doe said:

Troll.

Since your only contribution here seems to be reposting
things, in their entirety (including headers), and
adding one-line accusations of "troll," my suggestion to
you is this:

1) Print out all of your postings on heavy-stock paper
2) Crumple them up until they have sharp corners
everywhere
3) Shove them up your ass.

You are contributing nothing here. Either contribute
or shut up.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Quoted message said:

"thisisfun" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Path:

bgtnsc04-
eed!worldnet.att.net!208.48.142.85!newsfeed.news2me.com!sn-
xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-
01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail

Quoted message said:

From: "thisisfun" <[email hidden]> Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative Subject: Re: The Germ Theory...
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 08:23:59 -0500 Organization: Posted
via Supernews, supernews.comsupernews.comOpen ↗ Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> Reply-To:
"thisisfun" <[email hidden]> References:
<[email hidden]>

<[email hidden]>
<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Complaints-
To: [email hidden] Lines: 37 Xref: wnmaster11
misc.health.alternative:379486 X-Received-Date: Sat, 08
May 2004 13:16:29 GMT

(bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)

Quoted message said:

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article
<[email hidden]>, John Doe
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote
>
><snip>
>
>> We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society
>> exists to cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a
>> day on its mandate. We have become accustomed to
>> headlines announcing a "cancer breakthrough".
>
>Yeah, that's the one-way media for you.
>
>> These headlines have been occurring since 1924 and
>> yet the incidence of cancer has steadily increased.
>> In 1924 cancer was the 8th leading cause of death,
>> has now become the second lead cause of death and is
>> predicted to become the number one leading cause of
>> death in North America.
>
>That might have something to do with people living
>longer, maybe certain cancers are more likely to appear
>later in life.

In general, cancer is a disease of old age, the increase
in childhood cancers notwithstanding.

David, did you work hard to become so ignorant?

In article <[email hidden]>,

thisisfun said:

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Doe said:

"Dave Wickware" <[email hidden]> wrote

<snip>

> We all know (assume) the American Cancer Society
> exists to cure cancer. It spends 1 million dollars a
> day on its mandate. We have become accustomed to
> headlines announcing a "cancer breakthrough".

Yeah, that's the one-way media for you.

> These headlines have been occurring since 1924 and yet
> the incidence of cancer has steadily increased. In
> 1924 cancer was the 8th leading cause of death, has
> now become the second lead cause of death and is
> predicted to become the number one leading cause of
> death in North America.

That might have something to do with people living
longer, maybe certain cancers are more likely to appear
later in life.

In general, cancer is a disease of old age, the increase
in childhood cancers notwithstanding.

David, did you work hard to become so ignorant?

If you think I'm wrong, tools, let's see your evidence. Many
cancers are slow-growing or late developing. Lung cancer,
for example, is almost never seen in young people.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Troll.

[email hidden] (David Wright) wrote

Quoted message said:

Path: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-
.223.4.70!c01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!elnk-
atl-
rodigy.com!newssvr32.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!049e37f5!not-
for-mail Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Subject: Re:
The Germ Theory... References:
<[email hidden]>
<[email hidden]>
<[email hidden]>
<[email hidden]>
Organization: English Language Relay Satellite Service X-
Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) From:
[email hidden] (David Wright) Originator:
[email hidden] (David Wright) Lines: 72 Message-
ID: <[email hidden]> NNTP-Posting-
Host: 4.156.150.254 X-Complaints-To: [email hidden] X-
Trace: newssvr32.news.prodigy.com 1084066587 ST000
4.156.150.254 (Sat, 08 May 2004 21:36:27 EDT) NNTP-Posting-
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 21:36:27 EDT X-UserInfo1: SCSYASBE-
YBRCRV@YKBNFOFTBGR_N@ATM[@GZ_GYO^ZWZUYICD^RAQBKZQTZTX\_I[-
^G_KGFNON[ZOE_AZNVO^\XGGNTCIRPIJH[@RQKBXLRZ@CD^HKANYVW@RL-
GEZEJN@\_WZJBNZYYKVIOR]T]MNMG_Z[YVWSCH_Q[GPC_A@CARQVXDSDA-
^M]@DRVUM@RBM Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 01:36:27 GMT Xref:
wnmaster11 misc.health.alternative:379589 X-Received-Date:
Sun, 09 May 2004 01:37:04 GMT (bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net)

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Since your only contribution here seems to be reposting
things, in their entirety (including headers), and
adding one-line accusations of "troll," my suggestion to
you is this:

1) Print out all of your postings on heavy-stock paper
2) Crumple them up until they have sharp corners
everywhere
3) Shove them up your ass.

You are contributing nothing here. Either contribute or
shut up.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Thanx much.

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040509102031.13455.00000117@mb-
m06.aol.com...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: The Germ Theory... From: "Gymmy Bob"
[email hidden] Date: 5/8/04 9:46 AM Eastern Daylight
Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

You are stating that the "germ theory" is false and yet
present no other alternative.

I have been teaching an alternative for over 10 years now.
The best

alternative

Quoted message said:

is orthopathic medicine, started in the US in 1822.

Do a google search on these two topics: The physiological
laws of life. Seven stages of dis-ease.

The stages are enervation, toxemia, irritation,
inflammation, induration, ulceration, and lastly
fungation. Fungation is cancer formation.

Let me know if you can't find the articles.

DrC PhD