Road Cycling · Public discussion

The Jacob's Smoke Screen Begins

Started by B. Lafferty · · Last activity · 7 posts · 473 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
3 August 2006
Last activity
3 August 2006
Original author
B. Lafferty
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
473
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases. At any rate, it looks like
    Floyd has no intention of ever coming clean.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/aug06/aug03news2

  2. Jacobs also represented Tim Montgomery (Track & Field sprinter) who
    also ended up being banned -- seemingly deservedly so.
    Best,
    Bill Black (reformed attorney)

    B. Lafferty said:

    It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases. At any rate, it looks like
    Floyd has no intention of ever coming clean.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/aug06/aug03news2

  3. billb said:

    Jacobs also represented Tim Montgomery (Track & Field sprinter) who
    also ended up being banned -- seemingly deservedly so.
    Best,
    Bill Black (reformed attorney)

    B. Lafferty said:

    It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases. At any rate, it looks
    like
    Floyd has no intention of ever coming clean.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/aug06/aug03news2


    I believe in Floyd and don't believe in the test. I believe Floyd is
    innocent.

    --
    Bob in CT

  4. B. Lafferty said:

    It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases.

    Envious ?

  5. "Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    B. Lafferty said:

    It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases.

    Envious ?


    LOL. Not in the least, thank you.

  6. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    B. Lafferty said:

    It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases. At any rate, it looks like
    Floyd has no intention of ever coming clean.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/aug06/aug03news2

    This is delicious! The UCI announced `that one
    unidentified cyclist had tested positive at the Tour de
    France' because (wait for it) they knew the laboratory
    would leak the information, so the UCI prevented the leak
    by announcing it themselves. I am in awe. It's brilliant.

    --
    Michael Press

  7. B. Lafferty said:

    It should prove as effective as the one he created for Tyler. This guy
    makes an amazing amount of money losing cases. At any rate, it looks like
    Floyd has no intention of ever coming clean.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/aug06/aug03news2

    It's a brilliant legal strategy to claim dehydration. Especially after
    millions of people watched a particularly well-hydrated Landis solo to
    victory while wearing his soaking-wet team kit.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.