General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

There is no proof in science!

Started by Nicodemo · · Last activity · 6 posts · 407 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postThere is no proof in science!Nicodemo · 30 Apr 2004 02 / This pagePosts 1–6Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #6Bob · 4 May 2004

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 April 2004
Last activity
4 May 2004
Original author
Nicodemo
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
407
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    Nicodemo
    Archived post
    #1

    "Home, Home On The Mu_n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | >You made no statement about your data being discernible.
    | >you did make a statement about being absolutely accurate
    | >with your ability to count caloric expenditures, calories
    | >in general, and that is an absolute impossibility.
    |
    | On 29 Apr 2004 18:56:13 GMT, [email hidden]
    | (TopCounsel) wrote:
    |
    | >An "absolute impossibility," huh?
    |
    | Correct.
    |
    | > Care to derive for us an equation that demonstrates
    | > ("proves"😉 the unknowability of bodily calories consumed
    | > and expended?
    |
    | No. There is no proof in science.

    ROTFL

    Report
  2. Topcounsel
    Archived post
    #2
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    No. There is no proof in science.

    Quoted message said:

    ROTFL

    I wondered if anyone else would pick up on this one. I
    couldn't believe I got this guy so flustered he came out
    with that line! Well, then what the hell are we talking for
    at all, chump? !!!!

    Report
  3. Nicodemo
    Archived post
    #3

    "TopCounsel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | >> No. There is no proof in science.
    |
    | >ROTFL
    |
    | I wondered if anyone else would pick up on this one. I
    | couldn't believe I
    got
    | this guy so flustered he came out with that line! Well,
    | then what the
    hell are
    | we talking for at all, chump? !!!!
    |

    ******************************************************

    From: "Home, Home On The Mu_n" <[email hidden]>
    Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology,rec.running Subject: Re:
    Help with the truth about statins Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004
    14:42:08 -0400

    Don Kirkman said:
    Quoted message said:

    This remains a commentary.

    I know. I'm challenging you to stop offering commentary and
    to offer some evidence instead.

    What exactly do you consider evidence or proof? Science?

    antwrp.gsfc.nasa.govap960222.html Lift well,
    Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

    ******************************************************

    Report
  4. Munar Dust
    Archived post
    #4

    On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:44:41 GMT, "Nicodemo" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    | No. There is no proof in science.

    ROTFL

    You laugh at what? There is no proof in science and any
    scientist, which you obviously are not, would agree 100%
    with that statement.
    antwrp.gsfc.nasa.govap960222.html Lift well,
    Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

    Report
  5. Nicodemo
    Archived post
    #5

    "Munar Dust" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:44:41 GMT, "Nicodemo"
    | <[email hidden]> wrote:
    |
    | >| No. There is no proof in science.
    | >
    | >ROTFL
    |
    | You laugh at what? There is no proof in science and any
    | scientist, which you obviously are not, would agree 100%
    | with that statement.
    | antwrp.gsfc.nasa.govap960222.html Lift well,
    | Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

    Huh?

    Please rewrite in English.

    Report
  6. Bob
    Archived post
    #6
    Munar Dust said:
    Nicodemo said:

    | No. There is no proof in science.

    ROTFL

    You laugh at what? There is no proof in science and any
    scientist, which you obviously are not, would agree 100%
    with that statement.

    <LOLOL> How wonderfully silly. So all those chemistry
    experiments I did in university didn't prove anything? All
    the physics classes dealt with what... mere conjecture?

    Not a living true scientist believes that science is
    anything but a method of testing hypotheses through rigorous
    experimentation to a proof. That's what science *is*

    Buffoon.

    Bob

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.