There's hope for Heras

"Scott" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/race/int/articles/9273.0.html

In the United States the UCI would now be in extreme danger of law suit.
The same Brian Lafferty who screams "DOPE" any time a cyclist wins a race
would be the first one to file.

Tom Kunich said:

"Scott" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/race/int/articles/9273.0.html

In the United States the UCI would now be in extreme danger of law suit.
The same Brian Lafferty who screams "DOPE" any time a cyclist wins a race
would be the first one to file.

I wonder who'll be the first to file just such a lawsuit, for
defamation of character or whatever. My guess: Hamilton

Bill C said:

Quoted message said:

It's pretty clear from reading more of the stuff that this was a good
positive and he did dope, but since the system failed a doper walks
free. The other side is how many innocents are found guilty due to
errors also? This is my problem with the way they are doing things.
There is no way in hell to respect the accuracy of the system, either
positively or negatively. There is no credibility at all IMO.

B. Lafferty said:

Kill them all and let God sort it out? ;-)

He's a doper too.

"Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bill C said:

Quoted message said:

It's pretty clear from reading more of the stuff that this was a good
positive and he did dope, but since the system failed a doper walks
free. The other side is how many innocents are found guilty due to
errors also? This is my problem with the way they are doing things.
There is no way in hell to respect the accuracy of the system, either
positively or negatively. There is no credibility at all IMO.

B. Lafferty said:

Kill them all and let God sort it out? ;-)

He's a doper too.

It's all part of the Divine Plan.

B. Lafferty said:

Kill them all and let God sort it out? ;-)

Damn, that's a perfect straight line for me to be able to offend
everyone but the athiests out there. Think I'll have to leave finishing
that thought to someone else.
Bill C

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

Bill C said:

Quoted message said:

It's pretty clear from reading more of the stuff that this was a good
positive and he did dope, but since the system failed a doper walks
free. The other side is how many innocents are found guilty due to
errors also? This is my problem with the way they are doing things.
There is no way in hell to respect the accuracy of the system, either
positively or negatively. There is no credibility at all IMO.

B. Lafferty said:

Kill them all and let God sort it out? ;-)

He's a doper too.

Any you can be sure he gets the GOOD stuff.
------------
Alex

Michael Press said:

Of course not. We all know those riders are guilty. Why
else would they be racing? It's time they clamped down.

Yo. We have a winner. All modern bicycle racers race to have an excuse
to take drugs, especially one they can give their wives. Their
ultimate challenge isn't Paris-Roubaix or the Worlds or even winning
the Tour by 20 minutes - its finding an exotic performance drug that
[censored] Pound can't detect even retroactively.

Now take this to the next step. The real winners aren't the winners!
See, finishing first is easy - the real pro does the crafty racing
that lets them keep a pro contract while still taking drugs and
fooling [censored] Pound, while not doing something so obvious as winning
that would give it away to even rbr denizens. Crit Pro even.

(I have to get back to you on the 'All winners are dopers, except they
aren't really (see above)' logic loop - I need more ale to get around
that one and I'm doing this on a late lunch hour at work. I welcome
any help there.)

No, the good ones are down there around 13th, 14th place or so. Trust
me - I wouldn't steer you wrong on the big stuff. No stored samples,
no 'lets look at the B sample of the B sample' for these guys. Think
Stealth Drugging. Paid to Dope. The ones reading the 'Let's get LA'
posts and laughing up their sleeves. The real reason they're called
the laughing group...

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

In article <[email hidden]>,

Bill C said:

B. Lafferty said:

Kill them all and let God sort it out? ;-)

Damn, that's a perfect straight line for me to be able to offend
everyone but the athiests out there. Think I'll have to leave finishing
that thought to someone else.
Bill C

Do you think God uses the Dewey Decimate 'em System?

--
tanx,
Howard

The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

This man has just won the "Brian Lafferty Trophy for What Everyone In
The Know Knows!"

Howard Kveck
"Do you think God uses the Dewey Decimate 'em System?"

I had the idea that you used the Dewey system along with your brothers
Huey and Louey.

On 14 Dec 2005 06:26:45 -0800, "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

This man has just won the "Brian Lafferty Trophy for What Everyone In
The Know Knows!"

Geez, just what I need - another trophy of tarnished brass. Could I
just have a beer instead?

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...