General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

"Thermos" flask queries

Started by Broadback · · Last activity · 34 posts · 507 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
22 August 2007
Last activity
12 September 2007
Original author
Broadback
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
507
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I know "Thermos" is a make, however many people refer to flasks to keep
    liquids hot a Thermos. Anyway, I have no experience of these containers,
    so I would like to know how long will glass ones and stainless steel
    ones keep drinks piping hot? I assume the larger capacity ones will keep
    hot longer than smaller ones. I imagine glass are better, in this
    respect, than stainless steel. Any help would be appreciated.

  2. Broadback said:

    I know "Thermos" is a make, however many people refer to flasks to keep
    liquids hot a Thermos. Anyway, I have no experience of these containers,
    so I would like to know how long will glass ones and stainless steel
    ones keep drinks piping hot? I assume the larger capacity ones will keep
    hot longer than smaller ones. I imagine glass are better, in this
    respect, than stainless steel.

    I haven't noticed any particular difference between glass and steel as
    regards keeping things hot, but I've certainly noticed differences in
    longevity when dropped!

    You're right about bigger flasks keeping hot for longer IME. With my 1l
    flask I can pour it at the end of a long day and it'll still be very
    hot, where the half litre is clearly a fair bit cooler, but still
    usefully hot. Also, if you've already dipped into the contents the
    remainder will cool off quicker, but even with this a half litre flask
    is good for a longish day.

    To maximise the effect it's best to "charge" the flask with boiling
    water and leave it a few minutes, before emptying and putting in your
    drink. That way no heat is lost heating it up the flask itself.

    Steel ones are now very widely available and much cheaper than they used
    to be.

    If you want a hot drink on a day out then highly recommended. An option
    that really doesn't cut the mustard is an insulated lining bag for a
    standard drink bottle, and those are basically useless IME.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Broadback
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I know "Thermos" is a make, however many people refer to flasks to keep
    liquids hot a Thermos. Anyway, I have no experience of these
    containers, so I would like to know how long will glass ones and
    stainless steel ones keep drinks piping hot? I assume the larger
    capacity ones will keep hot longer than smaller ones. I imagine glass
    are better, in this respect, than stainless steel. Any help would be
    appreciated.

    A review in a walking magazine a year or 2 ago tested many and found
    that after 24 hours the temperature of 100°C water varied between ~60
    and 92.

    Regards
    --
    Bernard Hill
    Selkirk, Scotland

  4. "Broadback" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I know "Thermos" is a make, however many people refer to flasks to keep
    liquids hot a Thermos. Anyway, I have no experience of these containers, so
    I would like to know how long will glass ones and stainless steel ones keep
    drinks piping hot? I assume the larger capacity ones will keep hot longer
    than smaller ones. I imagine glass are better, in this respect, than
    stainless steel. Any help would be appreciated.

    Glass ones are cr*p but mainly because they break. This is a walking ng and
    there is surely no more depressing sound on a windswept hillside than the
    sound of broken glass swilling round with your tea, which is also leaking
    out into the rucksack.

    The trick with stainless steel ones is to *actually* follow the
    instructions. Boil the kettle. Fill the flask with the boiling water and
    put the lid on. Refill and boil the kettle. Warm the pot well. Make the tea.
    Empty the flask and pour in the tea (I add milk at this stage, but that's
    just me) quickly. This stays hot for 8hours.

    --
    Bob Mannix
    (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not)

  5. In message <[email hidden]>

    Bob Mannix said:

    The trick with stainless steel ones is to *actually* follow the
    instructions. Boil the kettle. Fill the flask with the boiling water and
    put the lid on. Refill and boil the kettle. Warm the pot well. Make the tea.
    Empty the flask and pour in the tea (I add milk at this stage, but that's
    just me) quickly. This stays hot for 8hours.

    And it tastes OK? I've managed to keep it hot before, but never
    managed to get drinkable tea from a flask (the best I've managed is to
    take separate teabags and milks).

    --
    Simon Challands

  6. Simon Challands said:

    And it tastes OK? I've managed to keep it hot before, but never
    managed to get drinkable tea from a flask (the best I've managed is to
    take separate teabags and milks).

    Make it up like you usually like it and unless that particular formula
    degrades over time there's no reason it should taste much different when
    it emerges.

    Taste will be preference though: for example, from the perspective of
    /my/ taste, why ruin perfectly good tea with milk? It's almost as bad
    as putting in sugar! ;-)

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  7. Bob Mannix said:

    The trick with stainless steel ones is to *actually* follow the
    instructions. Boil the kettle. Fill the flask with the boiling water and
    put the lid on.

    I don't fill the flask. I find that just an inch of boiling water
    does the job as long as I put the lid on and leave it to stand. When
    winter backpacking I use my flask-warming water for washing myself; an
    extra splash of cold water should be enough for a reasonable dhobi
    (and no wasted gas). I like a bit of luxury. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Refill and boil the kettle. Warm the pot well. Make the tea.

    If day-walking, and starting from home or YH etc, I make the tea in a
    jug then nuke it in the microwave for 10 or 20 seconds depending on
    the size of the flask.

    Quoted message said:

    Empty the flask and pour in the tea (I add milk at this stage, but that's
    just me) quickly. This stays hot for 8hours.

    My 1 litre flask is piping hot when I get back to the car at the end
    of a long walk. My 350ml flask rapidly loses heat if I drink some of
    my tea during the walk, but is still good for a standard day eg 8
    hours.

    Judith

  8. On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:54:17 +0100, Broadback <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    . I imagine glass are better, in this
    respect, than stainless steel. Any help would be appreciated.

    First came across stainless 15 years ago or so. Was on a major cave
    rescue in Wales. We were trying to get hot soup to the injured who
    was a very long way into the cave. All the glass flasks had broken
    on arrival at the scene. Then stainless flasks were produced which
    solved the problem.

    Totally convinced I bought a stainless steel 'bargain' a while later
    Was very unimpressed with it.

    A year or so later as a result of a long discussion in a pub I tried
    an experiment. Took my flask, plus a couple of other borrowed, but
    different steel ones, and a glass one.

    Warmed them all up with a several shots of boiling water, then filled
    them and left them for a couple of hours. Opened them and measured
    the temperature.

    Can't remember the exact numbers but basically it was something like:

    My stainless - 60 degrees
    Stainless 2 - 70 degrees
    Stainless 3 - 73 degrees
    Glass - 88 degrees Nuff said !

    As I say this was a while ago and things must have improved -
    hopefully.

    GrahamC

  9. Graham C said:

    On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:54:17 +0100, Broadback <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    . I imagine glass are better, in this
    respect, than stainless steel. Any help would be appreciated.

    First came across stainless 15 years ago or so. Was on a major cave
    rescue in Wales. We were trying to get hot soup to the injured who
    was a very long way into the cave. All the glass flasks had broken
    on arrival at the scene. Then stainless flasks were produced which
    solved the problem.

    Totally convinced I bought a stainless steel 'bargain' a while later
    Was very unimpressed with it.

    A year or so later as a result of a long discussion in a pub I tried
    an experiment. Took my flask, plus a couple of other borrowed, but
    different steel ones, and a glass one.

    Warmed them all up with a several shots of boiling water, then filled
    them and left them for a couple of hours. Opened them and measured
    the temperature.

    Can't remember the exact numbers but basically it was something like:

    My stainless - 60 degrees
    Stainless 2 - 70 degrees
    Stainless 3 - 73 degrees
    Glass - 88 degrees Nuff said !

    As I say this was a while ago and things must have improved -
    hopefully.

    GrahamC


    I remember reading the review mentioned earlier.
    Only problem was that I could never find the better performers in any
    shops or online.
    I usually take strong coffee or hot chocolate in mine and drink it
    within 3/4 hours !
    Robert

  10. Broadback said:

    I know "Thermos" is a make, however many people refer to flasks to keep
    liquids hot a Thermos.

    'Thermos' flasks? Only big girls' party frocks use 'Thermos' flasks in
    the hills - they're bulky for the volume of liquid they contain and heavy!

    Jim Ford

  11. Jim Ford said:

    'Thermos' flasks? Only big girls' party frocks use 'Thermos' flasks in
    the hills - they're bulky for the volume of liquid they contain and heavy!

    I guess that Norway must be a nation of big girls' party frocks, in that
    case...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. Peter Clinch said:
    Jim Ford said:

    'Thermos' flasks? Only big girls' party frocks use 'Thermos' flasks in
    the hills - they're bulky for the volume of liquid they contain and heavy!

    I guess that Norway must be a nation of big girls' party frocks, in that
    case...

    That's right - we proved that at the Battle of Stanford Bridge. 200
    ships came over and the survivors went back in 20, less their king!
    (I don't think they had Thermos flask with them, though!)

    Jim Ford

  13. In article <[email hidden]>, Graham C
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:54:17 +0100, Broadback <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    . I imagine glass are better, in this
    respect, than stainless steel. Any help would be appreciated.

    First came across stainless 15 years ago or so. Was on a major cave
    rescue in Wales. We were trying to get hot soup to the injured who
    was a very long way into the cave. All the glass flasks had broken
    on arrival at the scene. Then stainless flasks were produced which
    solved the problem.

    Totally convinced I bought a stainless steel 'bargain' a while later
    Was very unimpressed with it.

    A year or so later as a result of a long discussion in a pub I tried
    an experiment. Took my flask, plus a couple of other borrowed, but
    different steel ones, and a glass one.

    Warmed them all up with a several shots of boiling water, then filled
    them and left them for a couple of hours. Opened them and measured
    the temperature.

    Can't remember the exact numbers but basically it was something like:

    My stainless - 60 degrees
    Stainless 2 - 70 degrees
    Stainless 3 - 73 degrees
    Glass - 88 degrees Nuff said !

    As I say this was a while ago and things must have improved -
    hopefully.

    It's critically dependent on the design of the stopper. You only have to
    feel your flask(s) when containing hot water: the only hot/warm place is
    the cap. And the cooler the cap is, the less heat it loses.

    There are some clever stopper designs out there but don't ask me the
    details.

    --
    Bernard Hill
    Selkirk, Scotland

  14. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] writes

    Quoted message said:
    Graham C said:

    On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:54:17 +0100, Broadback <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    . I imagine glass are better, in this
    respect, than stainless steel. Any help would be appreciated.

    First came across stainless 15 years ago or so. Was on a major cave
    rescue in Wales. We were trying to get hot soup to the injured who
    was a very long way into the cave. All the glass flasks had broken
    on arrival at the scene. Then stainless flasks were produced which
    solved the problem.

    Totally convinced I bought a stainless steel 'bargain' a while later
    Was very unimpressed with it.

    A year or so later as a result of a long discussion in a pub I tried
    an experiment. Took my flask, plus a couple of other borrowed, but
    different steel ones, and a glass one.

    Warmed them all up with a several shots of boiling water, then filled
    them and left them for a couple of hours. Opened them and measured
    the temperature.

    Can't remember the exact numbers but basically it was something like:

    My stainless - 60 degrees
    Stainless 2 - 70 degrees
    Stainless 3 - 73 degrees
    Glass - 88 degrees Nuff said !

    As I say this was a while ago and things must have improved -
    hopefully.

    GrahamC


    I remember reading the review mentioned earlier.
    Only problem was that I could never find the better performers in any
    shops or online.
    I usually take strong coffee or hot chocolate in mine and drink it
    within 3/4 hours !
    Robert

    Exactly my experience. I remember that the top flask was in fact a 1
    litre "Thermos" brand and cost about £30.

    But I make do with a lesser animal because I drink powdered soup at the
    first stop, (typically 2-3 hours) and chocolate at the next, maybe 1-2
    hours later. That works OK for me.

    --
    Bernard Hill
    Selkirk, Scotland

  15. Jim Ford said:
    Peter Clinch said:
    Jim Ford said:

    'Thermos' flasks? Only big girls' party frocks use 'Thermos' flasks in
    the hills - they're bulky for the volume of liquid they contain and
    heavy!

    I guess that Norway must be a nation of big girls' party frocks, in that
    case...

    That's right - we proved that at the Battle of Stanford Bridge. 200
    ships came over and the survivors went back in 20, less their king!
    (I don't think they had Thermos flask with them, though!)

    Jim Ford


    Thanks all for your replies, useful and amusing. I have gone for the
    stainless steel, not tried it yet, but I am sure it will keep my drink
    hot enough for long enough, if not I guess I will have to throw it, buy
    a Thermos and a nice dress!

  16. Jim Ford said:

    That's right - we proved that at the Battle of Stanford Bridge. 200
    ships came over and the survivors went back in 20, less their king!
    (I don't think they had Thermos flask with them, though!)

    The last line is, of course, why it all went wrong for them. The
    followup at Hastings had all the Norman troops sporting a nice tartan
    flask with their sandwiches (and eye-on-a-stick for some), and look what
    happened there... ;-)

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  17. Peter Clinch said:
    Jim Ford said:

    That's right - we proved that at the Battle of Stanford Bridge. 200
    ships came over and the survivors went back in 20, less their king!
    (I don't think they had Thermos flask with them, though!)

    The last line is, of course, why it all went wrong for them. The
    followup at Hastings had all the Norman troops sporting a nice tartan
    flask with their sandwiches (and eye-on-a-stick for some), and look what
    happened there... ;-)

    The Normans were _very_ lucky at Hastings! It always impresses me when I
    imagine marching up to York, fighting a major battle, then marching back
    down South again to Hastings to fight.

    Jim Ford

  18. "Jim Ford" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Clinch said:
    Jim Ford said:

    That's right - we proved that at the Battle of Stanford Bridge. 200
    ships came over and the survivors went back in 20, less their king!
    (I don't think they had Thermos flask with them, though!)

    The last line is, of course, why it all went wrong for them. The
    followup at Hastings had all the Norman troops sporting a nice tartan
    flask with their sandwiches (and eye-on-a-stick for some), and look what
    happened there... ;-)

    The Normans were _very_ lucky at Hastings!

    Not really - it all went pear shaped when the Saxons thought the Normans
    were retreating, went down the hill after them and got cut to pieces by the
    cavalry. If they'd kept the shield wall then it's highly probable that
    William the [censored] (good name that!) would not have been victorious...

  19. Gordon said:

    "Jim Ford" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Clinch said:

    Jim Ford wrote:

    > That's right - we proved that at the Battle of Stanford Bridge. 200
    > ships came over and the survivors went back in 20, less their king!
    > (I don't think they had Thermos flask with them, though!)
    The last line is, of course, why it all went wrong for them. The
    followup at Hastings had all the Norman troops sporting a nice tartan
    flask with their sandwiches (and eye-on-a-stick for some), and look what
    happened there... ;-)


    The Normans were _very_ lucky at Hastings!

    Not really - it all went pear shaped when the Saxons thought the Normans
    were retreating, went down the hill after them and got cut to pieces by the
    cavalry. If they'd kept the shield wall then it's highly probable that
    William the [censored] (good name that!) would not have been victorious...


    Back to the serious bit. My wife bought me a Primus stainless steel
    flask from Blacks. Very disappointed. It come with 2 tops, one has a
    patent pour gizmo, leeks the heat though. The standard tops but when
    screwed in and the flask turned upside down it leeks! Unfortunately she
    bought it at Blacks in Manchester and we will not be going back there
    for a while to return it. Ha anyone else experience of this make, do
    they find it ok, have I just got a faulty one? any recommendations of a
    particular make please?

  20. Broadback said:

    Back to the serious bit. My wife bought me a Primus stainless steel
    flask from Blacks. Very disappointed. It come with 2 tops, one has a
    patent pour gizmo, leeks the heat though. The standard tops but when
    screwed in and the flask turned upside down it leeks!

    Sounds [censored] to me... if you can't get it back to the shop you bought it
    in I'd speak to their UK importer, who according to the lists on
    www.primus.se is http://www.rosker.co.uk/

    Quoted message said:

    bought it at Blacks in Manchester and we will not be going back there
    for a while to return it. Ha anyone else experience of this make, do
    they find it ok, have I just got a faulty one? any recommendations of a
    particular make please?

    I've never used their flasks, but I've been using their stoves since I
    was in the Scouts about 30 years ago, and they have a good reputation so
    I would think it's entirely possible you just had a lemon: /everyone/
    makes them from time to time.

    My flask collection is headed up by a Coleman one: original started
    losing heat badly after a couple of years, but though it was out of
    warranty they replaced it anyway. That replacement has been fine for
    years now. We've got a few others between us, and I think they're
    fairly generic "made in China" stuff, but seem to work fine. You can
    get them in Tescos etc. now.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.