General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

This Explains Your Donut Addiction ?

Started by Jim · · Last activity · 10 posts · 424 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 November 2007
Last activity
10 November 2007
Original author
Jim
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
424
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. [ Recent news article on rats preferring sugar water to cocaine is
    substantated in this article available in full at the link below with
    the abstract as follows. ]

    Full Article
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

    Intense Sweetness Surpasses Cocaine Reward

    Magalie Lenoir#, Fuschia Serre#, Lauriane Cantin, Serge H. Ahmed*

    University Bordeaux 2, Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS, UMR 5227, Bordeaux,
    France

    *Abstract*

    Background

    Refined sugars (e.g., sucrose, fructose) were absent in the diet of most
    people until very recently in human history. Today overconsumption of
    diets rich in sugars contributes together with other factors to drive
    the current obesity epidemic. Overconsumption of sugar-dense foods or
    beverages is initially motivated by the pleasure of sweet taste and is
    often compared to drug addiction. Though there are many biological
    commonalities between sweetened diets and drugs of abuse, the addictive
    potential of the former relative to the latter is currently unknown.
    Methodology/Principal findings

    Here we report that when rats were allowed to choose
    mutually-exclusively between water sweetened with saccharin–an intense
    calorie-free sweetener–and intravenous cocaine–a highly addictive and
    harmful substance–the large majority of animals (94%) preferred the
    sweet taste of saccharin. The preference for saccharin was not
    attributable to its unnatural ability to induce sweetness without
    calories because the same preference was also observed with sucrose, a
    natural sugar. Finally, the preference for saccharin was not
    surmountable by increasing doses of cocaine and was observed despite
    either cocaine intoxication, sensitization or intake escalation–the
    latter being a hallmark of drug addiction.
    Conclusions

    Our findings clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass
    cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals. We
    speculate that the addictive potential of intense sweetness results from
    an inborn hypersensitivity to sweet tastants. In most mammals, including
    rats and humans, sweet receptors evolved in ancestral environments poor
    in sugars and are thus not adapted to high concentrations of sweet
    tastants. The supranormal stimulation of these receptors by sugar-rich
    diets, such as those now widely available in modern societies, would
    generate a supranormal reward signal in the brain, with the potential to
    override self-control mechanisms and thus to lead to addiction.

    Citation: Lenoir M, Serre F, Cantin L, Ahmed SH (2007) Intense Sweetness
    Surpasses Cocaine Reward. PLoS ONE 2(8): e698.
    doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000698

    Academic Editor: Bernhard Baune, James Cook University, Australia

    Received: April 24, 2007; Accepted: July 4, 2007; Published: August 1, 2007

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

  2. Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't kill
    me.

    (I can't stand the "green" taste of stevia. I do avoid aspartame, after
    watching a documentary on it.)

    Igor reported success at rejecting all sweeteners.

    I use saccharine, cyclamates, and sucralose.

    Cubit
    320/152/160

    "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [ Recent news article on rats preferring sugar water to cocaine is
    substantated in this article available in full at the link below with the
    abstract as follows. ]

    Full Article
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

    Intense Sweetness Surpasses Cocaine Reward

    Magalie Lenoir#, Fuschia Serre#, Lauriane Cantin, Serge H. Ahmed*

    University Bordeaux 2, Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS, UMR 5227, Bordeaux,
    France

    *Abstract*

    Background

    Refined sugars (e.g., sucrose, fructose) were absent in the diet of most
    people until very recently in human history. Today overconsumption of
    diets rich in sugars contributes together with other factors to drive the
    current obesity epidemic. Overconsumption of sugar-dense foods or
    beverages is initially motivated by the pleasure of sweet taste and is
    often compared to drug addiction. Though there are many biological
    commonalities between sweetened diets and drugs of abuse, the addictive
    potential of the former relative to the latter is currently unknown.
    Methodology/Principal findings

    Here we report that when rats were allowed to choose mutually-exclusively
    between water sweetened with saccharin–an intense calorie-free
    sweetener–and intravenous cocaine–a highly addictive and harmful
    substance–the large majority of animals (94%) preferred the sweet taste of
    saccharin. The preference for saccharin was not attributable to its
    unnatural ability to induce sweetness without calories because the same
    preference was also observed with sucrose, a natural sugar. Finally, the
    preference for saccharin was not surmountable by increasing doses of
    cocaine and was observed despite either cocaine intoxication,
    sensitization or intake escalation–the latter being a hallmark of drug
    addiction.
    Conclusions

    Our findings clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass
    cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals. We
    speculate that the addictive potential of intense sweetness results from
    an inborn hypersensitivity to sweet tastants. In most mammals, including
    rats and humans, sweet receptors evolved in ancestral environments poor in
    sugars and are thus not adapted to high concentrations of sweet tastants.
    The supranormal stimulation of these receptors by sugar-rich diets, such
    as those now widely available in modern societies, would generate a
    supranormal reward signal in the brain, with the potential to override
    self-control mechanisms and thus to lead to addiction.

    Citation: Lenoir M, Serre F, Cantin L, Ahmed SH (2007) Intense Sweetness
    Surpasses Cocaine Reward. PLoS ONE 2(8): e698.
    doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000698

    Academic Editor: Bernhard Baune, James Cook University, Australia

    Received: April 24, 2007; Accepted: July 4, 2007; Published: August 1,
    2007

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

  3. Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't kill
    me.

    (I can't stand the "green" taste of stevia. I do avoid aspartame, after
    watching a documentary on it.)

    Igor reported success at rejecting all sweeteners.

    I use saccharine, cyclamates, and sucralose.

    Cubit
    320/152/160

    "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [ Recent news article on rats preferring sugar water to cocaine is
    substantated in this article available in full at the link below with the
    abstract as follows. ]

    Full Article
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

    Intense Sweetness Surpasses Cocaine Reward

    Magalie Lenoir#, Fuschia Serre#, Lauriane Cantin, Serge H. Ahmed*

    University Bordeaux 2, Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS, UMR 5227, Bordeaux,
    France

    *Abstract*

    Background

    Refined sugars (e.g., sucrose, fructose) were absent in the diet of most
    people until very recently in human history. Today overconsumption of
    diets rich in sugars contributes together with other factors to drive the
    current obesity epidemic. Overconsumption of sugar-dense foods or
    beverages is initially motivated by the pleasure of sweet taste and is
    often compared to drug addiction. Though there are many biological
    commonalities between sweetened diets and drugs of abuse, the addictive
    potential of the former relative to the latter is currently unknown.
    Methodology/Principal findings

    Here we report that when rats were allowed to choose mutually-exclusively
    between water sweetened with saccharin–an intense calorie-free
    sweetener–and intravenous cocaine–a highly addictive and harmful
    substance–the large majority of animals (94%) preferred the sweet taste of
    saccharin. The preference for saccharin was not attributable to its
    unnatural ability to induce sweetness without calories because the same
    preference was also observed with sucrose, a natural sugar. Finally, the
    preference for saccharin was not surmountable by increasing doses of
    cocaine and was observed despite either cocaine intoxication,
    sensitization or intake escalation–the latter being a hallmark of drug
    addiction.
    Conclusions

    Our findings clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass
    cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals. We
    speculate that the addictive potential of intense sweetness results from
    an inborn hypersensitivity to sweet tastants. In most mammals, including
    rats and humans, sweet receptors evolved in ancestral environments poor in
    sugars and are thus not adapted to high concentrations of sweet tastants.
    The supranormal stimulation of these receptors by sugar-rich diets, such
    as those now widely available in modern societies, would generate a
    supranormal reward signal in the brain, with the potential to override
    self-control mechanisms and thus to lead to addiction.

    Citation: Lenoir M, Serre F, Cantin L, Ahmed SH (2007) Intense Sweetness
    Surpasses Cocaine Reward. PLoS ONE 2(8): e698.
    doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000698

    Academic Editor: Bernhard Baune, James Cook University, Australia

    Received: April 24, 2007; Accepted: July 4, 2007; Published: August 1,
    2007

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

  4. Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't kill
    me.

    (I can't stand the "green" taste of stevia. I do avoid aspartame, after
    watching a documentary on it.)

    Igor reported success at rejecting all sweeteners.

    I use saccharine, cyclamates, and sucralose.

    Cubit
    320/152/160

    "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [ Recent news article on rats preferring sugar water to cocaine is
    substantated in this article available in full at the link below with the
    abstract as follows. ]

    Full Article
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

    Intense Sweetness Surpasses Cocaine Reward

    Magalie Lenoir#, Fuschia Serre#, Lauriane Cantin, Serge H. Ahmed*

    University Bordeaux 2, Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS, UMR 5227, Bordeaux,
    France

    *Abstract*

    Background

    Refined sugars (e.g., sucrose, fructose) were absent in the diet of most
    people until very recently in human history. Today overconsumption of
    diets rich in sugars contributes together with other factors to drive the
    current obesity epidemic. Overconsumption of sugar-dense foods or
    beverages is initially motivated by the pleasure of sweet taste and is
    often compared to drug addiction. Though there are many biological
    commonalities between sweetened diets and drugs of abuse, the addictive
    potential of the former relative to the latter is currently unknown.
    Methodology/Principal findings

    Here we report that when rats were allowed to choose mutually-exclusively
    between water sweetened with saccharin–an intense calorie-free
    sweetener–and intravenous cocaine–a highly addictive and harmful
    substance–the large majority of animals (94%) preferred the sweet taste of
    saccharin. The preference for saccharin was not attributable to its
    unnatural ability to induce sweetness without calories because the same
    preference was also observed with sucrose, a natural sugar. Finally, the
    preference for saccharin was not surmountable by increasing doses of
    cocaine and was observed despite either cocaine intoxication,
    sensitization or intake escalation–the latter being a hallmark of drug
    addiction.
    Conclusions

    Our findings clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass
    cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals. We
    speculate that the addictive potential of intense sweetness results from
    an inborn hypersensitivity to sweet tastants. In most mammals, including
    rats and humans, sweet receptors evolved in ancestral environments poor in
    sugars and are thus not adapted to high concentrations of sweet tastants.
    The supranormal stimulation of these receptors by sugar-rich diets, such
    as those now widely available in modern societies, would generate a
    supranormal reward signal in the brain, with the potential to override
    self-control mechanisms and thus to lead to addiction.

    Citation: Lenoir M, Serre F, Cantin L, Ahmed SH (2007) Intense Sweetness
    Surpasses Cocaine Reward. PLoS ONE 2(8): e698.
    doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000698

    Academic Editor: Bernhard Baune, James Cook University, Australia

    Received: April 24, 2007; Accepted: July 4, 2007; Published: August 1,
    2007

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000698

  5. "Cubit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't
    kill me.

    Somebody here, sometime, commented on artificial sweeteners. They said the
    jury was out on whether or not they were harmful, but we know for a fact
    that sugar is bad for you. -- Mike

  6. "Cubit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't
    kill me.

    Somebody here, sometime, commented on artificial sweeteners. They said the
    jury was out on whether or not they were harmful, but we know for a fact
    that sugar is bad for you. -- Mike

  7. "Cubit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't
    kill me.

    Somebody here, sometime, commented on artificial sweeteners. They said the
    jury was out on whether or not they were harmful, but we know for a fact
    that sugar is bad for you. -- Mike

  8. Cubit said:


    Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't kill
    me.

    (I can't stand the "green" taste of stevia. I do avoid aspartame, after
    watching a documentary on it.)

    Igor reported success at rejecting all sweeteners.

    I use saccharine, cyclamates, and sucralose.

    Cubit
    320/152/160

    "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    I hope that it is only a step towards eliminating all sweeteners
    completely. You don't need them and they will not give you much from the
    nutritional point of view. Man survived for all but the latest 100 years
    or so without them. Your money is better used on more exciting things. I
    wish you a great journey towards good health.

  9. Cubit said:


    Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't kill
    me.

    (I can't stand the "green" taste of stevia. I do avoid aspartame, after
    watching a documentary on it.)

    Igor reported success at rejecting all sweeteners.

    I use saccharine, cyclamates, and sucralose.

    Cubit
    320/152/160

    "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    I hope that it is only a step towards eliminating all sweeteners
    completely. You don't need them and they will not give you much from the
    nutritional point of view. Man survived for all but the latest 100 years
    or so without them. Your money is better used on more exciting things. I
    wish you a great journey towards good health.

  10. Cubit said:


    Seems sensible.

    I have used artificial sweeteners to replace sugar. I hope they don't kill
    me.

    (I can't stand the "green" taste of stevia. I do avoid aspartame, after
    watching a documentary on it.)

    Igor reported success at rejecting all sweeteners.

    I use saccharine, cyclamates, and sucralose.

    Cubit
    320/152/160

    "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    I hope that it is only a step towards eliminating all sweeteners
    completely. You don't need them and they will not give you much from the
    nutritional point of view. Man survived for all but the latest 100 years
    or so without them. Your money is better used on more exciting things. I
    wish you a great journey towards good health.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.