Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Thompson vs. Am Classic seatpost setback

Started by David B. · · Last activity · 6 posts · 614 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
1 January 2005
Last activity
2 January 2005
Original author
David B.
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
614
Views / 30 days
2

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quick question for the r.b.t gurus...

    Does the standard American Classic "2 piece" seatpost have equal, more,
    or less setback than a Thompson Elite setback post? Maxed out on a
    straight Elite post and need to get the saddle back another 2cm or so.

    Parenthetically, I'm also kinda surprised by the price differential
    between these two...Thompson seems to go for at least double the Am
    Classic. Any real world difference between the two? I've got Elites
    on all my bikes and like 'em but I'd prefer to save a few bucks at the
    moment.

  2. If it's for a mountain bike go Thomson.

    "David B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Quick question for the r.b.t gurus...

    Does the standard American Classic "2 piece" seatpost have equal, more,
    or less setback than a Thompson Elite setback post? Maxed out on a
    straight Elite post and need to get the saddle back another 2cm or so.

    Parenthetically, I'm also kinda surprised by the price differential
    between these two...Thompson seems to go for at least double the Am
    Classic. Any real world difference between the two? I've got Elites
    on all my bikes and like 'em but I'd prefer to save a few bucks at the
    moment.

  3. David B. said:

    Does the standard American Classic "2 piece" seatpost have equal, more,
    or less setback than a Thompson Elite setback post? Maxed out on a
    straight Elite post and need to get the saddle back another 2cm or so.

    The Thomson Elite setback version has 16mm of setback. Since it gets its
    setback by a bend in the upper portion, at least 10cm of post must be
    exposed (usually not a problem). Don't know about the AC.

    The longer (41mm) clamp on the Thomson puts less bending stress on the
    saddle rails, which may be important with Ti or hollow rails. The shorter
    clamp on the AC allows more fore/aft adjustment.

    Quoted message said:

    Parenthetically, I'm also kinda surprised by the price differential
    between these two...Thompson seems to go for at least double the Am
    Classic. Any real world difference between the two? I've got Elites
    on all my bikes and like 'em but I'd prefer to save a few bucks at the
    moment.

    The retail price of the Thomson Elite is about $80, and that's about what it
    goes for in most of the MO catalogs. But they're usually available for a lot
    less on eBay. I bought a brand new, never installed Elite with all the
    original packaging and documentation for $33.

    Art Harris

  4. Info on Thomson at www.lhthomson.com .

    "David B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Quick question for the r.b.t gurus...

    Does the standard American Classic "2 piece" seatpost have equal, more,
    or less setback than a Thompson Elite setback post? Maxed out on a
    straight Elite post and need to get the saddle back another 2cm or so.

    Parenthetically, I'm also kinda surprised by the price differential
    between these two...Thompson seems to go for at least double the Am
    Classic. Any real world difference between the two? I've got Elites
    on all my bikes and like 'em but I'd prefer to save a few bucks at the
    moment.

  5. Per Arthur Harris:

    Quoted message said:

    The Thomson Elite setback version has 16mm of setback. Since it gets its
    setback by a bend in the upper portion, at least 10cm of post must be
    exposed (usually not a problem). Don't know about the AC.

    One thing to check on the Thompson is that they don't adjust the shape of the
    seat mounts to take the stem bend into account. Bottom line, you can have
    alignment problems with a seat like Brooks B-17. If this looks like a problem
    with the seat you are going to use, check out Titec's offering, which isn't
    limited in that respect.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  6. Pete Cresswell said:

    One thing to check on the Thompson is that they don't adjust the


    shape of the

    Quoted message said:

    seat mounts to take the stem bend into account. Bottom line, you can


    have

    Quoted message said:

    alignment problems with a seat like Brooks B-17. If this looks


    like a problem

    Quoted message said:

    with the seat you are going to use, check out Titec's offering, which


    isn't

    Quoted message said:

    limited in that respect.

    I think that was a problem with their original "0-degree" seat clamps
    where some saddles would be tilted upwards too much. Newer Thomsons use
    a 12-degree seat clamp which should not have that problem. If you have
    an older 0-degree clamp, it can be replaced with a 12-degree clamp. See
    their instruction sheet at:

    http://www.lhthomson.com/docs/seatpost.pdf

    But you're right that they don't compensate for the 10-degree bend on
    the setback models, which means the tilt range is different than for
    the non-setback models.

    Art Harris

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.