Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January. But
all seems quiet at the moment.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
timeline for Tyler defense
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 18 January 2005
- Last activity
- 23 January 2005
- Original author
- Gary
- Posts
- 28
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,192
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.
ButQuoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.
ButQuoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.
ButQuoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.
ButQuoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.
ButQuoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.
ButQuoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
I try not to be so rash. It will come out eventually one way or the
other. No need to rush to judgment.Tom said:
Gary said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January.But
Quoted message said:
all seems quiet at the moment.
He's guilty, move on.
Tom
-
"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I try not to be so rash. It will come out eventually one way or the other.
No need to rush to judgment.Nipplehead,
Exactly...lets think about this for a second, or two, . Two failed tests, a
month or so apart, teammate (and training partner) busted for the same
thing..but wait..lets think about this for a bit...........ok times up...He
is still guilty as sinDave
-
"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I remember
Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January. But all seems
quiet at the moment.Some of his fans are asking that on his web site.
http://www.tylerhamilton.com/guestbook94.html Hamilton has provided no
information there since 12/12/04. -
Dave H said:
"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I try not to be so rash. It will come out eventually one way or the
other.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
No need to rush to judgment.
Nipplehead,
Exactly...lets think about this for a second, or two, . Two failed
tests, aQuoted message said:
month or so apart, teammate (and training partner) busted for the
sameQuoted message said:
thing..but wait..lets think about this for a bit...........ok times
up...HeQuoted message said:
is still guilty as sin
Dave
Dumbass -
Too bad for him he got popped, he would've made a great politician
(liar).K. Gringioni.
-
Note that Tyler and Phonak share a common cause (since Phonak was
excluded from the Pro Tour anyways), yet they have not joined forces.
If the contract termination was strictly limited to bettering Phonak's
Pro Tour hopes, then it would only make sense for the two parties to
fight their case together and share their learnings with each other.Makes me think that Phonak never believed in his innocence at all. If
they did, then they logically would have taken up arms together. -
Dave H said:
Nipplehead,
You know how basketball boards on public playgrounds get used for ads
nowadays? Well, there was a minor controversy last week in Holland where
a local piercing studio decided to make the most out of their space:
http://images.fok.nl/upload/050115_28609_basketbalbordtepelpiercingrotterdam.jpg--
Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/ -
B Lafferty said:
"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
rememberQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January. But all
seemsQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
quiet at the moment.
Some of his fans are asking that on his web site.
http://www.tylerhamilton.com/guestbook94.html Hamilton has provided
noQuoted message said:
information there since 12/12/04.
For once, I'm going to have to agree with Brian, and just say that
Tyler = guilty, and he probably has no recourse to prove that he's not
guilty. He'll probably just fade away, and at some point in time say,
oh 5-10 years from now on this group, there will be a "what happened
to Tyler" thread, and we'll learn of his fate then. For now, he's
just going to go away I think...Tom
-
"Tom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
B Lafferty said:
"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
rememberQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January. But all
seemsQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
quiet at the moment.
Some of his fans are asking that on his web site.
http://www.tylerhamilton.com/guestbook94.html Hamilton has provided
noQuoted message said:
information there since 12/12/04.
For once, I'm going to have to agree with Brian, and just say that
Tyler = guilty, and he probably has no recourse to prove that he's not
guilty. He'll probably just fade away, and at some point in time say,
oh 5-10 years from now on this group, there will be a "what happened
to Tyler" thread, and we'll learn of his fate then. For now, he's
just going to go away I think...Tom
It ain't over until it's over.
-
B Lafferty said:
"Tom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
B Lafferty said:
"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...>Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? I
remember
Quoted message said:
>Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January. But all
seems
Quoted message said:
>quiet at the moment.
Some of his fans are asking that on his web site.
http://www.tylerhamilton.com/guestbook94.html Hamilton has providedno
Quoted message said:
information there since 12/12/04.
For once, I'm going to have to agree with Brian, and just say that
Tyler = guilty, and he probably has no recourse to prove that he's not
guilty. He'll probably just fade away, and at some point in time say,
oh 5-10 years from now on this group, there will be a "what happened
to Tyler" thread, and we'll learn of his fate then. For now, he's
just going to go away I think...Tom
It ain't over until it's over.
Near as I can tell, it's over. I don't have to wait for the sun to
collapse to decide that. -
"Tim Lines" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
B Lafferty said:
"Tom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
B Lafferty wrote:
>"Gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>
>>Does anybody know when something new will happen with the case? Iremember
>>Tyler saying he would be able to defend himself in January. But all
seems
>>quiet at the moment.
>
>Some of his fans are asking that on his web site.
>http://www.tylerhamilton.com/guestbook94.html Hamilton has providedno
>information there since 12/12/04.
For once, I'm going to have to agree with Brian, and just say that
Tyler = guilty, and he probably has no recourse to prove that he's not
guilty. He'll probably just fade away, and at some point in time say,
oh 5-10 years from now on this group, there will be a "what happened
to Tyler" thread, and we'll learn of his fate then. For now, he's
just going to go away I think...Tom
It ain't over until it's over.
Near as I can tell, it's over. I don't have to wait for the sun to
collapse to decide that.I've done enough trials know that there's no decision until the jury comes
back. There can always be surprises, but I do agree with you that it's
highly unlikely. -
"Dave H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Exactly...lets think about this for a second, or two, . Two failed tests,
a month or so apart, teammate (and training partner) busted for the same
thing..but wait..lets think about this for a bit...........ok times
up...He is still guilty as sinSo where did you gain your biological testing expertise and where did you
obtain the data pertinent to the case in question? -
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Note that Tyler and Phonak share a common cause (since Phonak was
excluded from the Pro Tour anyways), yet they have not joined forces.Why would they do that? What does Phonak have to gain that is anywhere near
equal to what they have to lose? -
"Tom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
For once, I'm going to have to agree with Brian, and just say that
Tyler = guilty, and he probably has no recourse to prove that he's not
guilty.And you'll be completely wrong. You can bet that this will end up in a US
court where they take a dim view on not providing the defense with 100% of
the information behind the testing procedures.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.