Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

"Toy-Bicycle Syndrome"

Started by cfsmtb · · Last activity · 10 posts · 949 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
6 June 2006
Last activity
10 June 2006
Original author
cfsmtb
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
949
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Fascinating article from Procycling about the so called "Toy-Bicycle Syndrome" from an American perspective. From an 'Australian perspective', the recent increase of commuter and utility cycling has numerous irrational obstacles to overcome.
    http://probicycle.com/

    Which we will in due course ... (cfsmtb sits up a bit straighter, pushes shoulders back, looks stoically into the distance....)

    ****************************
    The American Toy-Bicycle Syndrome:
    Bike riders are unpredictable. Motorists should not have to dodge or be delayed by bicycles. Much more like pedestrians than vehicles, bicycles should not be on the roads at all. If a separate sidewalk or other pedestrian/bicycle path can not be provided, then bicyclists must be kept out of the way of motorists by the use of separate bicycle lanes.

    Toy Bicycle:
    - Grouped with pedestrians as a Pedestrian-On-Wheels.
    - Separate, limited, dangerous, slow, substandard restricted system of lanes and paths.
    - Special classification of access, rights and rules.
    - Dangerous shared pedestrian paths.
    - Go somewhere to ride

    Vehicular Cycling:
    - Same rights and legal standing as every other vehicle operator.
    - Enforce safe sharable road design policies. Accommodation on every road. - - Sharable-width lanes, bikeable shoulders.
    - Same Roads - Same Rights - Same Rules
    - The safest form of recreational and utility cycling- by far.
    - Ride to go somewhere

    How did this happen, and how does it continue?
    The Toy-Bicycle Syndrome began in the 1950's and is based upon the concept of bicycling as children's' play activity, which in fact it largely was in the America of 1950. In the 1970's a fitness-crazed adult American public discovered the modern lightweight 10-speed bicycle and the "bike boom" began.

    Millions of cyclists took to the roads and panic set in with motorists and transportation planners that had long held the belief that bicycles belonged on sidewalks. Thirty years later, those same concepts prevail and control the American bicycling environment.

    Worse than ignorance alone, the American public and transportation establishment base their beliefs and actions on a false foundation. Motorists and the vast majority of bicycle owners have no understanding of the concepts and safety of proper cycling and how easy it is for motorists and cyclists to coexist. Rather than working for the little that is needed to make vehicular cycling safe, easy and practical on every road, American bicycle advocacy, decisions and goals are invariably based on the toy-bicycle syndrome.

  2. cfsmtb said:

    Fascinating article from Procycling about the so called "Toy-Bicycle Syndrome" from an American perspective. From an 'Australian perspective', the recent increase of commuter and utility cycling has numerous irrational obstacles to overcome.
    http://probicycle.com/

    Which we will in due course ... (cfsmtb sits up a bit straighter, pushes shoulders back, looks stoically into the distance....)

    ****************************
    The American Toy-Bicycle Syndrome:
    Bike riders are unpredictable. Motorists should not have to dodge or be delayed by bicycles. Much more like pedestrians than vehicles, bicycles should not be on the roads at all. If a separate sidewalk or other pedestrian/bicycle path can not be provided, then bicyclists must be kept out of the way of motorists by the use of separate bicycle lanes.

    Toy Bicycle:
    - Grouped with pedestrians as a Pedestrian-On-Wheels.
    - Separate, limited, dangerous, slow, substandard restricted system of lanes and paths.
    - Special classification of access, rights and rules.
    - Dangerous shared pedestrian paths.
    - Go somewhere to ride

    Vehicular Cycling:
    - Same rights and legal standing as every other vehicle operator.
    - Enforce safe sharable road design policies. Accommodation on every road. - - Sharable-width lanes, bikeable shoulders.
    - Same Roads - Same Rights - Same Rules
    - The safest form of recreational and utility cycling- by far.
    - Ride to go somewhere

    How did this happen, and how does it continue?
    The Toy-Bicycle Syndrome began in the 1950's and is based upon the concept of bicycling as children's' play activity, which in fact it largely was in the America of 1950. In the 1970's a fitness-crazed adult American public discovered the modern lightweight 10-speed bicycle and the "bike boom" began.

    Millions of cyclists took to the roads and panic set in with motorists and transportation planners that had long held the belief that bicycles belonged on sidewalks. Thirty years later, those same concepts prevail and control the American bicycling environment.

    Worse than ignorance alone, the American public and transportation establishment base their beliefs and actions on a false foundation. Motorists and the vast majority of bicycle owners have no understanding of the concepts and safety of proper cycling and how easy it is for motorists and cyclists to coexist. Rather than working for the little that is needed to make vehicular cycling safe, easy and practical on every road, American bicycle advocacy, decisions and goals are invariably based on the toy-bicycle syndrome.

    "Same Roads
    Same Rights
    Same Rules"

    We need a jersy with this printed on it, in a large font.

  3. That's quite a funny site.. reminds me of the onion:

    "87% of Americans commit to bicycle commuting. Bike path to be built."

    RUBY SLIPPERS, KS- Results are in for America's most comprehensive
    survey of bicycle transportation. Almost nine of ten adult Americans
    say
    they definitely might occasionally be likely to bicycle to work once in
    a
    while given a government-provided bicycle and a commute less than
    3 miles with no hills on sunny days between 64 and 71 degrees when
    they had no other errands to run if their employer provided monetary
    incentives with mileage reimbursement, shower facilities, indoor
    secured
    bicycle parking and free taxi rides home for emergencies if gasoline
    prices
    skyrocket except for Mondays and Fridays if a bicycle path was
    available.
    A spokesman for the Federal Highway Administration called the survey
    results exciting verification for FHWA's bicycle transportation program
    which helps local transportation agencies find a scenic creek bank
    where
    the bike path can be installed.

    (ps: the original cited article makes a lot of good points, despite the
    alarmist beginning)

  4. In aus.bicycle on Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:04:29 +1000

    Bikesoiler said:

    "Same Roads
    Same Rights
    Same Rules"

    What... no passing on the left unless the other vehicle is turning
    right?

    No more than one vehicle in the lane unless the other is turning?

    No advanced stop lines?

    No parking on the footpath? No "shared paths" at all?

    Are you sure....

    Zebee

  5. Zebee Johnstone said:

    In aus.bicycle on Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:04:29 +1000

    Bikesoiler said:

    "Same Roads
    Same Rights
    Same Rules"

    What... no passing on the left unless the other vehicle is turning right?

    No more than one vehicle in the lane unless the other is turning?

    No advanced stop lines?

    No parking on the footpath? No "shared paths" at all?

    Are you sure....

    Zebee

    Where did you get the no passing on the left?

    Meh. I'd trade a lot for wide curbside lanes & better attitude in most drivers.

  6. Bikesoiler said:

    "Same Roads
    Same Rights
    Same Rules"

    We need a jersy with this printed on it, in a large font.

    I'd be in for that if a batch got printed. High visibility of course 🙂

  7. In aus.bicycle on Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:18:06 +1000

    Bikesoiler said:


    Where did you get the no passing on the left?

    Cars can't do it in the same lane. They can on a 2 lane road.

    A bicycle can on a one lane road.

    Quoted message said:

    Meh. I'd trade a lot for wide curbside lanes & better attitude in most
    drivers.

    But you couldn't *use* the kerbside lanes. Not to pass cars anyway.

    Zebee

  8. Duncan said:


    (ps: the original cited article makes a lot of good points, despite the
    alarmist beginning)

    I'll agree that some of the Effective Cycling material can come across as too strident, you should lurk on the Chainguard list and read the tanties!

  9. Bikesoiler said:

    Where did you get the no passing on the left?
    Meh. I'd trade a lot for wide curbside lanes & better attitude in most drivers.

    You get the better attitude over here but you have to trade for the dodgy weather and dodgier food. The beer is better though 🙂

    hippy

  10. hippy said:

    You get the better attitude over here but you have to trade for the dodgy weather and dodgier food. The beer is better though 🙂

    As good as Bikesoilers wondrous homebrew? He's getting quite good at this new hobby .. 😉

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.