Road Cycling · Public discussion

Trainers, rollers or a gym membership??

Started by Matt Shepherd · · Last activity · 10 posts · 439 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
24 November 2004
Last activity
25 November 2004
Original author
Matt Shepherd
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
439
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'll try to be brief -- I bike to work and back M-F for seven months of the
    year (I live in Quebec, Canada), putting I'd figure about 100km on the bike
    every week.

    In the off-season, when I can't jog, I've been jumping rope and working a
    punching bag in my basement for cardio, but it's getting a bit stale.

    I have a weightlifting setup in my basement that I rather like, though, that
    meets my needs.

    So the dilemma facing me is:

    Gym membership ($40 per month x 4 months, $160)
    vs.
    A $200 budget to buy a trainer or some rollers (I figure they'll last long
    enough to be worth "extra" gym membership time).

    At home, I have the convenience of rolling out of bed and working out in the
    morning, and since I don't have a car, that's VERY convenient vs. taking a
    bus ride to the gym and then another bus ride to work; I can listen to the
    music I want, and I have all the weights I need for a complete non-cardio
    workout.

    BUT

    At a gym, there's a heck of a lot more equipment for both cardio and
    non-cardio, including rowers, elliptical trainers, etc., as well as a
    personal trainer and good motivation.

    Which leads to two questions:

    1. whether a +/- $200 roller would be an adequate replacement for the
    exercise bikes they'd have at a gym, and

    2. which "budget" roller setups are best. I've been looking at the Tacx, but
    if anyone has better suggestions I'd love to hear them. I live in Canada, so
    I prefer to order from within the country (avoid those nasty customs
    charges).

    Opinions welcome. Sorry about all the blather.

    - Matt

  2. Matt Shepherd wrote:
    || Which leads to two questions:
    ||
    || 1. whether a +/- $200 roller would be an adequate replacement for the
    || exercise bikes they'd have at a gym, and
    ||
    || 2. which "budget" roller setups are best. I've been looking at the
    || Tacx, but if anyone has better suggestions I'd love to hear them. I
    || live in Canada, so I prefer to order from within the country (avoid
    || those nasty customs charges).

    If you have to make a choice and can't get both, then I'd say go for the gym
    membership. It offers more variety in terms of cardio (plus getting out of
    the house/home can be motivating, too). I don't they could be a perfect
    replacement for the roller, but since you aren't racing or anything, simply
    maintaining your weight and overall fitness ought to get you by. IMO.

  3. "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If you have to make a choice and can't get both, then I'd say go for the


    gym

    Quoted message said:

    membership. It offers more variety in terms of cardio (plus getting out


    of

    Quoted message said:

    the house/home can be motivating, too). I don't they could be a perfect
    replacement for the roller, but since you aren't racing or anything,


    simply

    Quoted message said:

    maintaining your weight and overall fitness ought to get you by. IMO.

    Plus, there's the social aspect of going to the gym. You get to meet a lot
    of like minded people and if you ask the right people the right questions,
    you can learn a lot as well.

    IMO, the key to success at the gym is to make it part of your daily routine.
    After a while, if you miss a day you really feel like something's missing.
    Even during the warmer months, when I bike more than I do now, I still keep
    the gym as part of my routine.

    Cheto

  4. Matt Shepherd said:

    I'll try to be brief -- I bike to work and back M-F for seven months
    of the year (I live in Quebec, Canada), putting I'd figure about
    100km on the bike every week.

    In the off-season, when I can't jog, I've been jumping rope and
    working a punching bag in my basement for cardio, but it's getting a
    bit stale.

    How about XC skiing?

    Matt O.

  5. "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Matt Shepherd said:

    I'll try to be brief -- I bike to work and back M-F for seven months
    of the year (I live in Quebec, Canada), putting I'd figure about
    100km on the bike every week.

    In the off-season, when I can't jog, I've been jumping rope and
    working a punching bag in my basement for cardio, but it's getting a
    bit stale.

    How about XC skiing?

    Matt O.


    I'm avid -- but when I have about 45 minutes in the morning to work out,
    it's not really practical. By the time there's enough snow on the ground to
    ski (and I'm lucky in that there's a trail starting within 1 km of my
    house), it's too dark to actually do it before 7:30 a.m., and by then it's
    not worth the bother. It's a 7-minute walk there, 7 minutes back, and I wind
    up only getting about 15 minutes of skiing in.

    I go every weekend, though.

    - Matt S.

  6. Matt Shepherd said:
    Quoted message said:

    How about XC skiing?

    Quoted message said:

    I'm avid -- but when I have about 45 minutes in the morning to work
    out, it's not really practical. By the time there's enough snow on
    the ground to ski (and I'm lucky in that there's a trail starting
    within 1 km of my house), it's too dark to actually do it before 7:30
    a.m., and by then it's not worth the bother. It's a 7-minute walk
    there, 7 minutes back, and I wind up only getting about 15 minutes of
    skiing in.

    Have you tried skiing with a headlight? It's better than biking at night,
    because snow is so reflective it brightens up more with lights. In fact I think
    you don't give up much compared to skiing during the day, except warmth. A
    Nightsun Sunsport light is perfect.

    Matt O.

  7. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Trainers, rollers or a gym membership??
    From: "Matt Shepherd" [email hidden]
    Date: 11/24/2004 11:09 AM US Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    I'll try to be brief -- I bike to work and back M-F for seven months of the
    year (I live in Quebec, Canada), putting I'd figure about 100km on the bike
    every week.

    In the off-season, when I can't jog, I've been jumping rope and working a
    punching bag in my basement for cardio, but it's getting a bit stale.

    I have a weightlifting setup in my basement that I rather like, though, that
    meets my needs.

    So the dilemma facing me is:

    Gym membership ($40 per month x 4 months, $160)
    vs.
    A $200 budget to buy a trainer or some rollers (I figure they'll last long
    enough to be worth "extra" gym membership time).

    At home, I have the convenience of rolling out of bed and working out in the
    morning, and since I don't have a car, that's VERY convenient vs. taking a
    bus ride to the gym and then another bus ride to work; I can listen to the
    music I want, and I have all the weights I need for a complete non-cardio
    workout.

    BUT

    At a gym, there's a heck of a lot more equipment for both cardio and
    non-cardio, including rowers, elliptical trainers, etc., as well as a
    personal trainer and good motivation.

    Which leads to two questions:

    1. whether a +/- $200 roller would be an adequate replacement for the
    exercise bikes they'd have at a gym, and

    2. which "budget" roller setups are best. I've been looking at the Tacx, but
    if anyone has better suggestions I'd love to hear them. I live in Canada, so
    I prefer to order from within the country (avoid those nasty customs
    charges).

    Opinions welcome. Sorry about all the blather.

    - Matt

    I'd go with the rollers. The cheapest set I have seen are 130 at supergo. I
    went first class and got the kreitlers with the fan resistance.

  8. "Matt Shepherd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'll try to be brief -- I bike to work and back M-F for seven months of
    the
    year (I live in Quebec, Canada), putting I'd figure about 100km on the
    bike
    every week.

    In the off-season, when I can't jog, I've been jumping rope and working a
    punching bag in my basement for cardio, but it's getting a bit stale.

    I have a weightlifting setup in my basement that I rather like, though,
    that
    meets my needs.

    So the dilemma facing me is:

    Gym membership ($40 per month x 4 months, $160)
    vs.
    A $200 budget to buy a trainer or some rollers (I figure they'll last long
    enough to be worth "extra" gym membership time).

    At home, I have the convenience of rolling out of bed and working out in
    the
    morning, and since I don't have a car, that's VERY convenient vs. taking a
    bus ride to the gym and then another bus ride to work; I can listen to the
    music I want, and I have all the weights I need for a complete non-cardio
    workout.

    BUT

    At a gym, there's a heck of a lot more equipment for both cardio and
    non-cardio, including rowers, elliptical trainers, etc., as well as a
    personal trainer and good motivation.

    Which leads to two questions:

    1. whether a +/- $200 roller would be an adequate replacement for the
    exercise bikes they'd have at a gym, and

    2. which "budget" roller setups are best. I've been looking at the Tacx,
    but
    if anyone has better suggestions I'd love to hear them. I live in Canada,
    so
    I prefer to order from within the country (avoid those nasty customs
    charges).

    Opinions welcome. Sorry about all the blather.

    - Matt

    I rely on rollers for my indoor winter workouts. I just can't stand the
    trainer. It's like doing an interval workout every single time you get on
    the trainer. But with rollers, you can go hard or easy, long or short. I
    can't do 2 hours on the trainer, but I can on the rollers. I consider that
    about the equivalent of a 3 hour ride outside ... not so much from the
    physical challenge as the mental one. But with rollers, like anything else,
    you get what you pay for. Cheap rollers are cheap. Kreitler rollers are
    awesome. I have a set of Kreitler Challenger rollers that I've been riding
    for years and years. This season I dropped about $40 and replaced all the
    bearings and the rubber band. They're like brand new except for all the
    sweat encrusted on the rails.

    Bob C.

  9. "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Matt Shepherd said:
    Quoted message said:

    How about XC skiing?

    Quoted message said:

    I'm avid -- but when I have about 45 minutes in the morning to work
    out, it's not really practical. By the time there's enough snow on
    the ground to ski (and I'm lucky in that there's a trail starting
    within 1 km of my house), it's too dark to actually do it before 7:30
    a.m., and by then it's not worth the bother. It's a 7-minute walk
    there, 7 minutes back, and I wind up only getting about 15 minutes of
    skiing in.

    Have you tried skiing with a headlight? It's better than biking at night,
    because snow is so reflective it brightens up more with lights. In fact I


    think

    Quoted message said:

    you don't give up much compared to skiing during the day, except warmth.


    A

    Quoted message said:

    Nightsun Sunsport light is perfect.


    OH. MY. GOD.

    That's brilliant. Thanks for mentioning it!

    Everything around here is very hilly, so the idea of careening down through
    the trees with a headlamp is ... challenging ... but MAN, that's a great
    idea. I'll get on it!

    Thanks a million!

    - Matt S.

  10. Matt Shepherd said:

    At home, I have the convenience of rolling out of bed and working out in the
    morning, and since I don't have a car, that's VERY convenient vs. taking a
    bus ride to the gym and then another bus ride to work; I can listen to the

    Get the trainer. Stressful effort to "get to exercise"
    just becomse a reason not to exercise, in about 100%
    of cases.

    Quoted message said:

    1. whether a +/- $200 roller would be an adequate replacement for the
    exercise bikes they'd have at a gym, and

    Yea, verily. Better, even. Exercycles don't fit you right,
    and most can't be made to no matter what.

    If you could get to the gym in 3 minutes (I can) I'd say
    to do the gym because of all the other stuff you can do
    there if riding the cycle gets boring. But the boring part
    will be the 20-60 minutes dealing with the bus.

    --Blair
    "Go in peace. Come back pumped."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.