Triathlon

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hobbes said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Hobbes said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (Runs With Knives) wrote:

> In article <[email hidden]>,
> Dally <[email hidden]> writes:
>> Hugh Beyer wrote:
>>
>>> The falling out, if anybody cares, was because the W* person was
>>> having a
>>> knock-down drag-out of the sort she specializes in with Lee,
>>> Lucas, and JMW. Chuckles jumped in "defending" her in his usual
>>> smarmy and condescending style, expecting, I think, that she
>>> would do the Borg mind-
>>> meld with him the way Dave-from-Oz has. Instead, preferring to
>>> fight her own battles, W* smacked him hard and I don't think he
>>> ever recovered from
>>> the shock.
>>
>> Nice synopsis. I'd forgotten what his problem was.
> [snip]
>
> Fascinating.
>
> Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
> somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
> to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
> regular. Is this true?

Not really. He changed his internet name, but has been upfront about
his identity. He basically dropped the identity with his true name
and went with Charles.

I've done a similar thing - went from my actual name to 'Hobbes' and
sign Keith at the bottom. I suspect most people know Hobbes is
actually Keith Hobman. And most of us know who Charles is as well.

BTW - obviously I'm not too worried if people know who I am. I don't
feel any overt threat. Comes from living at the end of the world
(okay, but you can see it from here!). But I do respect other people
who don't want their names spread all over the place - like both
Charles and Dally.

BTW Dally - by the criteria you use if you consider Charles a
sockpuppet than you would also be one. Right?

Someday I'll come clean with my real identity. 🙂
--
-Larry

Coward. Use your *real* name! (remind you of anyone?)

Quoted message said:

"Larry Hodges" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hobbes said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Hobbes said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (Runs With Knives) wrote:

> In article <[email hidden]>,
> Dally <[email hidden]> writes:
>> Hugh Beyer wrote:
>>
>>> The falling out, if anybody cares, was because the W* person was
>>> having a
>>> knock-down drag-out of the sort she specializes in with Lee,
>>> Lucas, and JMW. Chuckles jumped in "defending" her in his usual
>>> smarmy and condescending style, expecting, I think, that she
>>> would do the Borg mind-
>>> meld with him the way Dave-from-Oz has. Instead, preferring to
>>> fight her own battles, W* smacked him hard and I don't think he
>>> ever recovered from
>>> the shock.
>>
>> Nice synopsis. I'd forgotten what his problem was.
> [snip]
>
> Fascinating.
>
> Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
> somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
> to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
> regular. Is this true?

Not really. He changed his internet name, but has been upfront about
his identity. He basically dropped the identity with his true name
and went with Charles.

I've done a similar thing - went from my actual name to 'Hobbes' and
sign Keith at the bottom. I suspect most people know Hobbes is
actually Keith Hobman. And most of us know who Charles is as well.

BTW - obviously I'm not too worried if people know who I am. I don't
feel any overt threat. Comes from living at the end of the world
(okay, but you can see it from here!). But I do respect other people
who don't want their names spread all over the place - like both
Charles and Dally.

BTW Dally - by the criteria you use if you consider Charles a
sockpuppet than you would also be one. Right?

Someday I'll come clean with my real identity. 🙂
--
-Larry

Coward. Use your *real* name! (remind you of anyone?)

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Lee Michaels said:

"Hobbes"wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

(Runs With Knives) said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
Dally <[email hidden]> writes:
> Hugh Beyer wrote:
>
>> The falling out, if anybody cares, was because the W* person was
>> having a
>> knock-down drag-out of the sort she specializes in with Lee, Lucas,
>> and
>> JMW. Chuckles jumped in "defending" her in his usual smarmy and
>> condescending style, expecting, I think, that she would do the Borg
>> mind-
>> meld with him the way Dave-from-Oz has. Instead, preferring to fight
>> her
>> own battles, W* smacked him hard and I don't think he ever recovered
>> from
>> the shock.
>
> Nice synopsis. I'd forgotten what his problem was.
[snip]

Fascinating.

Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
regular. Is this true?

Not really. He changed his internet name, but has been upfront about his
identity. He basically dropped the identity with his true name and went
with Charles.

I've done a similar thing - went from my actual name to 'Hobbes' and
sign Keith at the bottom. I suspect most people know Hobbes is actually
Keith Hobman. And most of us know who Charles is as well.

And all this time I thought you were Keith's evil twin.

Keith is the evil twin. Mick is the good one. (Actually Mick is 11
months and 4 days older, but everyone thought we were twins.)

--
Keith

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?

It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
athletic than you are.

Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Jason

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?

It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
athletic than you are.

Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Jason

"Jason Earl" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?

It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
athletic than you are.

Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Jason

Right on Jason. 'looking like a dork' should not be your exclusive domain

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

--
Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
[email hidden] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Good stuff Richard! What an amazing bit of sleuthing!! Did he really do
that? I am impressed. We should appoint you as the official mfw usenet
monitoring service

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:14:44 -0000, [email hidden] (Richard "dopey

censored' Hedd) said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym,

It's not!

Quoted message said:

why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well?

I don't!

Quoted message said:

(Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

How much more proof do you want?

Quoted message said:

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC),

He didn't!

Quoted message said:

"Charles" followed-up, agreeing in every respect.

He would, he's a sniveling [censored].

Quoted message said:

So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

I do get quite [censored] most weekends - so who knows?

"Jason Earl" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?

It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
athletic than you are.

Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Save your breath Jason.

Chucky is always like this. He delights in the nimber of people he has
driven way from this newsgroup with this kind of abuse.

"Jason Earl" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?

It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
athletic than you are.

Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Save your breath Jason.

Chucky is always like this. He delights in the nimber of people he has
driven way from this newsgroup with this kind of abuse.

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Maybe it is a bipolar disorder.

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Maybe it is a bipolar disorder.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Lee Michaels said:

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

>
>Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
>somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
>to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
>regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Maybe it is a bipolar disorder.

It is not a tooomah!!

--
Keith

In article <[email hidden]>,

Lee Michaels said:

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

>
>Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
>somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
>to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
>regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Maybe it is a bipolar disorder.

It is not a tooomah!!

--
Keith

Lee Michaels said:

"Jason Earl" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

>It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
>mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
>decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
>that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
>you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
>your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
>Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
>might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?
>
>It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
>have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
>proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
>ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
>athletic than you are.
>
>Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
>people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Save your breath Jason.

Chucky is always like this. He delights in the nimber of people he has
driven way from this newsgroup with this kind of abuse.

I can "nimber" the number of times you write [censored] like this by raising
the number of legs on a centipede to the power of 50!! ;o)

(If you don't understand that, don't try and work the "nimbers" out on
your fingers.) ;o)

Lee Michaels said:

"Jason Earl" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

>It is amazing the amount of time and effort that you have put into
>mocking Dally. It doesn't effect you in the slightest if she
>decides to call herself a triathlete, and you can't even pretend
>that you are sticking up for the honor of triathletes everywhere, as
>you are not (apparently) a triathlete either. So what precisely is
>your motivation? Does it simply appeal to you to be mean-spirited?
>Are you afraid that if Dally can be considered an athlete that they
>might start mistaking you for a forty-year-old female?
>
>It's especially interesting that you would respond the way that you
>have as Dally has never once professed to be a particularly
>proficient triathlete. She trained for months, she showed up, she
>ran. It's not like Dally is saying that she is now somehow more
>athletic than you are.
>
>Perhaps things are different where you are from, but where I live
>people that enjoy putting other people down for no apparent reason

And there's the nub of it Jason, because the reasons aren't
"apparent" to you. You'll need to go back a while to understand
what's gone between Wendy and me, so you are really involving
yourself in things you know nothing about.

What sort of "history" could there be between you and Dally that would
justify the type of language and behavior that you have exhibited?
What did she do, steal your wife away?

It's USENET and you are free to do whatever the heck you like, but
most of the people that read your post won't know of your "history."
Either include some rationale for your words (which will probably
prove difficult) or find some other way to make your point that isn't
so offensive. Either that or you can look like a dork every time you
respond to Dally.

It's up to you.

Save your breath Jason.

Chucky is always like this. He delights in the nimber of people he has
driven way from this newsgroup with this kind of abuse.

I can "nimber" the number of times you write [censored] like this by raising
the number of legs on a centipede to the power of 50!! ;o)

(If you don't understand that, don't try and work the "nimbers" out on
your fingers.) ;o)

Lee Michaels said:

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

>
>Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
>somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
>to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
>regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Maybe it is a bipolar disorder.

Who in their right mind would post here year after year?!! ;o)

Lee Michaels said:

"Richard "dopey [censored]" Hedd" wrote

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:59:31 -0000, [email hidden] (Runs With Knives)
wrote:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

>
>Since we're discussing Chuckles' mental maladies, can I request that
>somebody clear something up for me? ISTR seeing a couple references
>to the fact that "Charles" is actually the sock of another MFW
>regular. Is this true?

Now listen up [censored], I shall say this only once:

"Charles" is John Hudson, aka "Don Quixote" aka "Charles Ponsonby Esq"
of www.fitnwell.net fame, and you only don't know because you wander
about with your head firmly up your [censored] most of the time.

[snip]

Okay. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

Well, since you're soliciting...

If "Charles" is a "new" posting pseudonym, why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well? (Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC), "Charles" followed-up,
agreeing in every respect. So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

Maybe it is a bipolar disorder.

Who in their right mind would post here year after year?!! ;o)

In article <[email hidden]>,

Charles said:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:14:44 -0000, [email hidden] (Richard "dopey

censored' Hedd) said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
Charles <[email hidden]> writes:

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If there is anything else you would like to know just ask you dopey
[censored].

[snip]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

why do you still post as
"John Hudson," as well?

I don't!

I see. Does Hanson post as you, then?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

(Assuming, for the moment, you really are
also "John Hudson," of course.)

How much more proof do you want?

I'm probably getting more than I'll later find I wanted, but
carrying right along...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

When "John Hudson" posted an opinion on something recently (in one of
the "athlete"-related sub-threads, IIRC),

He didn't!

Au contraire, he did!

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"Charles" followed-up, agreeing in every respect.

He would, he's a sniveling [censored].

I dunno about the "sniveling" part...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

So either "Charles"/"John Hudson" has MPD
or your were having a lark. Do you know which it was?

I do get quite [censored] most weekends - so who knows?

Indeed.

--
Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
[email hidden] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876