in message <[email hidden]>, Tony B
(') said:Rob Morley said:In article <[email hidden]>, Tony B
[email hidden] says...Quoted message said:Quoted message said:You are trying to defend the indefensible.
Quoted message said:No I'm not.
OK, fair doos I stand corrected; it does sound apologetic though. I do
think it's dangerous though - there's maybe 70-90kg moving quickly
through peds crossing the road. Which would be like being hit with a
large hammer? How could that not be dangerous?
OK, slightly modify my response: it's not particularly
dangerous /to/ /the/ /cyclists/. If you pass an elderly or frail
pedestrian that close at that sort of speed they could easily fall, and
for the old and frail simple falls can lead to complications that can lead
to death. If you actually hit a pedestrian, even a young and healthy one,
you'd cause some injury, possibly even quite bad injury - but I'd be
inclined to believe that an actual impact is unlikely.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; IE 3 is dead, but Netscape 4 still shambles about the earth,
;; wreaking a horrific vengeance upon the living
;; anonymous