UK and Europe · Public discussion

Tut Tut...

Started by The other view point, there is one you know... · · Last activity · 43 posts · 430 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
27 June 2007
Last activity
1 July 2007
Original author
The other view point, there is one you know...
Posts
43
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
430
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–43 of 43
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. in message <[email hidden]>, Tony B

    (') said:
    Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Tony B
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You are trying to defend the indefensible.

    Quoted message said:

    No I'm not.

    OK, fair doos I stand corrected; it does sound apologetic though. I do
    think it's dangerous though - there's maybe 70-90kg moving quickly
    through peds crossing the road. Which would be like being hit with a
    large hammer? How could that not be dangerous?

    OK, slightly modify my response: it's not particularly
    dangerous /to/ /the/ /cyclists/. If you pass an elderly or frail
    pedestrian that close at that sort of speed they could easily fall, and
    for the old and frail simple falls can lead to complications that can lead
    to death. If you actually hit a pedestrian, even a young and healthy one,
    you'd cause some injury, possibly even quite bad injury - but I'd be
    inclined to believe that an actual impact is unlikely.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; IE 3 is dead, but Netscape 4 still shambles about the earth,
    ;; wreaking a horrific vengeance upon the living
    ;; anonymous

  2. Simon Brooke said:

    If you actually hit a pedestrian, even a young and healthy one,
    you'd cause some injury, possibly even quite bad injury - but I'd be
    inclined to believe that an actual impact is unlikely.

    So unlikely that it would never happen, and I'm sure the pedestrian
    hit by a cyclist in the film takes comfort from the fact that it
    didn't happen.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  3. soup said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    ... but I think he's right about this one. It isn't nearly as dangerous as
    it looks.

    Have to agree, the idiots in this video look to be relatively
    undangerous, compared to someone driving a Nitroglycerine truck, cycling
    like that in typical London traffic flow. But view some of his other
    videos ( from America) the roads are wider the traffic seems faster
    moving and it is BLEEP BLEEP dangerous.

    I watched the NYC video a couple of years or so ago and thought
    something along the lines of "scary, but WOW" but my attitude to this
    one was totally different, more akin to "****ing a***holes". I'm not
    sure what caused the difference in attitude, being a bit older and
    more sensible (hah, never!), being more familiar with the city or just
    less in awe of the initial concept. I must admit when one of the
    riders had a drink can thrown at him I was rather disappointed it
    didn't have a greater effect.

    Graeme

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.