Waiting On Tommy Kunich's Proof

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

Quoted message said:

Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............

Give it a rest.

--
Snippy

"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:MR8qg.93120$I61.24843@clgrps13...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

Quoted message said:

Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............

Give it a rest.

--
Snippy

Rev., t'was not I who made the assertion and then became typically nasty
when asked to prove the assertion. Besides, I'm having fun with my stalker.

B. Lafferty a écrit :

Quoted message said:

"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:MR8qg.93120$I61.24843@clgrps13...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

Quoted message said:

Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............

Rev., t'was not I who made the assertion and then became typically nasty
when asked to prove the assertion. Besides, I'm having fun with my stalker.

Hypocrite.

There is no proof of your personal target's doping, he's out of racing,
but you keep up your rant, nonetheless. Here, a reliable story that has
never been denied, and you want documentation. Maybe a video. Bank
statements. Confession.

You better find a new song, Brian. Your voice is cracked mortally.
Persistence has only so much moral clout, then it becomes a harangue.
You're there.

--

Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty a écrit :

Quoted message said:

"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:MR8qg.93120$I61.24843@clgrps13...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

> Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............
>

Rev., t'was not I who made the assertion and then became typically nasty
when asked to prove the assertion. Besides, I'm having fun with my
stalker.

Hypocrite.

There is no proof of your personal target's doping, he's out of racing,
but you keep up your rant, nonetheless. Here, a reliable story that has
never been denied, and you want documentation. Maybe a video. Bank
statements. Confession.

Excuse me......my stalker has said that Merckx stated that he was paid money
to not ride the 1973 Tour. Tommy has presented nothing to support that
assertion unlike the situation with a certain retired pro rider. The "no
proof" commen of your his at best hyberbole. I'll assume the best of you,
which is to say, that you're upset a French rider didn't win today.

Quoted message said:

You better find a new song, Brian. Your voice is cracked mortally.

Oh dear me! Does that mean my computer is going to freeze up?

Quoted message said:

Persistence has only so much moral clout, then it becomes a harangue.
You're there.

I'm every bit as persistant and a certain ex-pro who keeps surfacing to
proclaim that he never tested positive, the Betsey hates him and her husband
is simply suporting her, that Pound is releasing arbitration documents to Le
Monde, etc., etc.
:-)

Quoted message said:

--

Bonne route !

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

B. Lafferty a écrit :

Quoted message said:

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty a écrit :

Quoted message said:

"Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:MR8qg.93120$I61.24843@clgrps13...

> "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote ...
>
>
>> Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............
>>
>>
Rev., t'was not I who made the assertion and then became typically nasty
when asked to prove the assertion. Besides, I'm having fun with my
stalker.

Hypocrite.

There is no proof of your personal target's doping, he's out of racing,
but you keep up your rant, nonetheless. Here, a reliable story that has
never been denied, and you want documentation. Maybe a video. Bank
statements. Confession.

Excuse me......my stalker

Paranoia or self-aggrandizement ? You don't rate a stalker.

Quoted message said:

has said that Merckx stated that he was paid money
to not ride the 1973 Tour. Tommy has presented nothing to support that
assertion unlike the situation with a certain retired pro rider. The "no
proof" commen of your his at best hyberbole. I'll assume the best of you,
which is to say, that you're upset a French rider didn't win today.

Someone wrote that George won Sunday - not quite, but he wore a yellow
shirt.
Today, Monday, Hushovd seems to have done the same. In either case, it
doesn't offend me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You better find a new song, Brian. Your voice is cracked mortally.

Oh dear me! Does that mean my computer is going to freeze up?

It means that fewer and fewer people will read your comments, that you
are getting more distanced from reality and the ability to communicate
effectively, and that your voice will be lost.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Persistence has only so much moral clout, then it becomes a harangue.
You're there.

I'm every bit as persistant and a certain ex-pro who keeps surfacing to
proclaim that he never tested positive,

Funny - he appeared yesterday on that Weekend Edition of non-News -
forgot the name. If people didn't ask, he wouldn't have to reply. He has
replied, and you're not happy. Maligning an old coot in RBR is not a
realistic way to get your answer. Ask him. Ask persistently, as you
pride that quality in yourself. Do so until you get a personal, direct
answer. Then publish. Just give up the pretense of being sincere, as you
have obliterated that with the chase for fame as a net nemesis.

Quoted message said:

the Betsey hates him and her husband
is simply suporting her, that Pound is releasing arbitration documents to Le
Monde, etc., etc.
:-)

We are both lawyers. We know unsettled cases are usually contested
hotly. Guys in prison mostly deny their crimes. People who owe civil
judgments [censored] about the lies the other side told. This is all old
stuff, especially for us, and over the years, for RBR. So find something
new. Maybe get in some riding, racing even. Watch them. You are not
class monitor by appointment or by arrogation. You are now reaching _up_
to the level of "pest".

--

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR
-
?Someone who knows too much finds it hard not to lie.?
Wittgenstein, L.

B. Lafferty said:

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

You better find a new song, Brian. Your voice is cracked mortally.

Oh dear me! Does that mean my computer is going to freeze up?

Quoted message said:

Persistence has only so much moral clout, then it becomes a harangue.
You're there.

I'm every bit as persistant and a certain ex-pro who keeps surfacing to
proclaim that he never tested positive, the Betsey hates him and

<snip>

Dumbass -

You're doing a very good job of avoiding comprehension what Sandy has
told you.

Many of the rest of us have told you, less eloquently, the same thing.
Does the ship move away from the shore or the shore away from the ship?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty a écrit :

Quoted message said:

"Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty a écrit :

> "Snippy Bobkins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:MR8qg.93120$I61.24843@clgrps13...
>
>
>> "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote ...
>>
>>
>>> Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............
>>>
>>>
> Rev., t'was not I who made the assertion and then became typically
> nasty when asked to prove the assertion. Besides, I'm having fun with
> my stalker.
>
>
>
Hypocrite.

There is no proof of your personal target's doping, he's out of racing,
but you keep up your rant, nonetheless. Here, a reliable story that has
never been denied, and you want documentation. Maybe a video. Bank
statements. Confession.

Excuse me......my stalker

Paranoia or self-aggrandizement ? You don't rate a stalker.

Quoted message said:

has said that Merckx stated that he was paid money to not ride the 1973
Tour. Tommy has presented nothing to support that assertion unlike the
situation with a certain retired pro rider. The "no proof" commen of your
his at best hyberbole. I'll assume the best of you, which is to say,
that you're upset a French rider didn't win today.

Someone wrote that George won Sunday - not quite, but he wore a yellow
shirt.
Today, Monday, Hushovd seems to have done the same. In either case, it
doesn't offend me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You better find a new song, Brian. Your voice is cracked mortally.

Oh dear me! Does that mean my computer is going to freeze up?

It means that fewer and fewer people will read your comments, that you are
getting more distanced from reality and the ability to communicate
effectively, and that your voice will be lost.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Persistence has only so much moral clout, then it becomes a harangue.
You're there.

I'm every bit as persistant and a certain ex-pro who keeps surfacing to
proclaim that he never tested positive,

Funny - he appeared yesterday on that Weekend Edition of non-News - forgot
the name. If people didn't ask, he wouldn't have to reply. He has replied,
and you're not happy. Maligning an old coot in RBR is not a realistic way
to get your answer. Ask him. Ask persistently, as you pride that quality
in yourself. Do so until you get a personal, direct answer. Then publish.
Just give up the pretense of being sincere, as you have obliterated that
with the chase for fame as a net nemesis.

Quoted message said:

the Betsey hates him and her husband is simply suporting her, that Pound
is releasing arbitration documents to Le Monde, etc., etc.
:-)

We are both lawyers. We know unsettled cases are usually contested hotly.
Guys in prison mostly deny their crimes. People who owe civil judgments
[censored] about the lies the other side told. This is all old stuff,
especially for us, and over the years, for RBR. So find something new.
Maybe get in some riding, racing even. Watch them. You are not class
monitor by appointment or by arrogation. You are now reaching _up_ to the
level of "pest".

--

Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR
-
?Someone who knows too much finds it hard not to lie.?
Wittgenstein, L.

Please take note that this thread had nothing to do with a certain ex pro
rider until you made your comment regarding him.

B. Lafferty said:

Quoted message said:

-
?Someone who knows too much finds it hard not to lie.?
Wittgenstein, L.

Please take note that this thread had nothing to do with a certain ex pro
rider until you made your comment regarding him.

Dumbass -

Kunich made his Merckx comment in the L'Equipe thread.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Quoted message said:

Dumbass -

You're doing a very good job of avoiding comprehension what Sandy has
told you.

Many of the rest of us have told you, less eloquently, the same thing.
Does the ship move away from the shore or the shore away from the ship?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Dumbass -

Why are you all taking issue with Brian calling TK on one of his
ridiculous assertions?

-RJ, was paid to skip the 73 Tour but I lost the receipt.

In article <[email hidden]>,

ronaldo_jeremiah said:

Quoted message said:

Dumbass -

You're doing a very good job of avoiding comprehension what Sandy has
told you.

Many of the rest of us have told you, less eloquently, the same thing.
Does the ship move away from the shore or the shore away from the ship?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Dumbass -

Why are you all taking issue with Brian calling TK on one of his
ridiculous assertions?

-RJ, was paid to skip the 73 Tour but I lost the receipt.

No tickee, no laundry!

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

ronaldo_jeremiah said:

Why are you all taking issue with Brian calling TK on one of his
ridiculous assertions?

Dumbass -

Good point.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Howard Kveck said:

No tickee, no laundry!

Better not lose your Fuentes Inc. receipt or you get no blood.

Sandy said:

Paranoia or self-aggrandizement ? You don't rate a stalker.

He's just jealous because heather hasn't stalked him.

"Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sandy said:

Paranoia or self-aggrandizement ? You don't rate a stalker.

He's just jealous because heather hasn't stalked him.

You got that right. :-)