B. Lafferty a écrit :
> "Sandy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>> B. Lafferty a écrit :
>>
>>> "Snippy Bobkins" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:MR8qg.93120$I61.24843@clgrps13...
>>>
>>>
>>>> "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Still waiting for the quotes and sources, Tom. Tom............
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Rev., t'was not I who made the assertion and then became typically nasty
>>> when asked to prove the assertion. Besides, I'm having fun with my
>>> stalker.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hypocrite.
>>
>> There is no proof of your personal target's doping, he's out of racing,
>> but you keep up your rant, nonetheless. Here, a reliable story that has
>> never been denied, and you want documentation. Maybe a video. Bank
>> statements. Confession.
>>
>
> Excuse me......my stalker
Paranoia or self-aggrandizement ? You don't rate a stalker.
> has said that Merckx stated that he was paid money
> to not ride the 1973 Tour. Tommy has presented nothing to support that
> assertion unlike the situation with a certain retired pro rider. The "no
> proof" commen of your his at best hyberbole. I'll assume the best of you,
> which is to say, that you're upset a French rider didn't win today.
>
Someone wrote that George won Sunday - not quite, but he wore a yellow
shirt.
Today, Monday, Hushovd seems to have done the same. In either case, it
doesn't offend me.
>> You better find a new song, Brian. Your voice is cracked mortally.
>>
>
> Oh dear me! Does that mean my computer is going to freeze up?
>
>
It means that fewer and fewer people will read your comments, that you
are getting more distanced from reality and the ability to communicate
effectively, and that your voice will be lost.
>> Persistence has only so much moral clout, then it becomes a harangue.
>> You're there.
>>
>
> I'm every bit as persistant and a certain ex-pro who keeps surfacing to
> proclaim that he never tested positive,
Funny - he appeared yesterday on that Weekend Edition of non-News -
forgot the name. If people didn't ask, he wouldn't have to reply. He has
replied, and you're not happy. Maligning an old coot in RBR is not a
realistic way to get your answer. Ask him. Ask persistently, as you
pride that quality in yourself. Do so until you get a personal, direct
answer. Then publish. Just give up the pretense of being sincere, as you
have obliterated that with the chase for fame as a net nemesis.
> the Betsey hates him and her husband
> is simply suporting her, that Pound is releasing arbitration documents to Le
> Monde, etc., etc.
> 
>
>
We are both lawyers. We know unsettled cases are usually contested
hotly. Guys in prison mostly deny their crimes. People who owe civil
judgments ***** about the lies the other side told. This is all old
stuff, especially for us, and over the years, for RBR. So find something
new. Maybe get in some riding, racing even. Watch them. You are not
class monitor by appointment or by arrogation. You are now reaching _up_
to the level of "pest".
--
Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR
-
?Someone who knows too much finds it hard not to lie.?
Wittgenstein, L.
