General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Water filters for backpacking

Started by Judith · · Last activity · 32 posts · 2,128 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
12 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
Judith
Posts
32
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,128
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 32
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I know this question crops up from time to time but googling
    has raised more questions than it answers!

    I would like to buy a water filter for use when backpacking.

    My criteria are:

    1. Lightweight and small.

    2. Usable throughput - ie I don't want to spend ages
    generating half a cup of water.

    3. "Better" than Iodine on its own, which is what I use now.

    The two that I am considering are the Pre Mac Travel Well
    Pocket and the MSR WaterWorks EX filter. Does anyone have
    practical experience of these?

    The Pre Mac has a recommended 2 minutes standing time in
    which it applies iodine to the filtered water. I'm not sure
    how much water it processes in one go ..... but this must
    slow down the process. Surely it's easier to use a plain and
    simple filter and then drop an iodine tablet into the
    filtered water?

    The MSR filter screws onto Nalgene bottles and MSR hydration
    packs. I have no idea how wide these are. Does anyone know
    if it would screw onto a Platypus bladder or onto a standard
    1-litre MOD water bottle? And is it a real PITA if you
    cannot screw the filter onto a bottle?

    I'd appreciate any experience you can share.

    Cheers Judith

  2. Judith said:

    I'd appreciate any experience you can share.

    Perhaps not what you're looking for, but at least in UK
    hills my experience is they're not worth the bother, because
    I don't have trouble drinking from burns. Much more
    convenient, and I've a pretty large sample base of drinks
    not to be worried from.

    I did see the great Shock! Horror! Scandal water test in
    Trail, but I think they're missing the point to some degree.
    I've drunk out of river pools with fish living in them, and
    if they support fish they also support a whole lot more
    besides, certainly including bacteria, but since the water
    is basically clean it's not a problem. But unless you have
    no basic immunity to anything at all, having tried to
    sterilise everything you drink or an unusual medical
    condition, it should be well within your body's ability to
    deal with it.

    Other places, certainly some overseas, is a different
    matter. I do have a Sweetwater filter I had for the USA but
    lent it to a friend off to Africa a few years ago. Never
    felt any great reason to ask for it back... So the executive
    summary here is for people in a normal state of health in
    upland UK you're probably spending money, carrying extra
    weight and wasting time that's all unnecessary.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext.
    33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177
    Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  3. Peter Clinch said:

    I've drunk out of river pools with fish living in them,
    and if they support fish they also support a whole lot
    more besides, certainly including bacteria, but since the
    water is basically clean it's not a problem. But unless
    you have no basic immunity to anything at all, having
    tried to sterilise everything you drink or an unusual
    medical condition, it should be well within your body's
    ability to deal with it.


    There is a significant(?) risk of liver fluke if there are
    sheep around.

  4. Chris said:

    There is a significant(?) risk of liver fluke if there are
    sheep around.

    There are sheep around all across the UK. There are
    significant numbers of walkers who don't filter water. This
    is the first time I've heard anyone suggest liver flukes are
    a problem from untreated water, so I suspect that it isn't
    actually a big problem. According to google pond snails are
    an intermediary, which AFAICT aren't a major feature of
    running streams in hills, and the infection is picked up by
    animals from plants near the water when grazing. Though I
    certainly haven't done extensive research on how big a
    problem it is. I'd be interested in further info if it
    really is a problem.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext.
    33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177
    Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  5. Chris proteus1@gmxDOTnet said:
    Peter Clinch said:

    I've drunk out of river pools with fish living in them,
    and if they support fish they also support a whole lot
    more besides, certainly including bacteria,

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    There is a significant(?) risk of liver fluke if there are
    sheep around.

    Significant? No. Risk? Always.

    There's always "risk" of something baaa-d being out there,
    shirley its a case using common sense and not losing sight
    of the fact that we live around bacteria all of the time,
    and not just every _waking_ minute ;-)

    Re.: the original post, I have no experience of water
    filters (except in an industrial sense ;-) but I'd agree
    with the gist of Pete's post. If in [real] doubt you could
    always use your iodine, boil it, or go thirsty for a wee
    while. That said I'd be as interested in hearing experience
    of others using filters [abroad?].

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    thenmc.org.ukindex.php

    NMC website: thenmc.org.ukthenmc.org.uk

  6. Peter Clinch said:

    I did see the great Shock! Horror! Scandal water test
    in Trail, but I think they're missing the point to
    some degree.

    I think the Trail test served a purpose, albeit focussed.
    IMHO there was a flaw in the design of their study (sic.)
    in that they chose the obvious places where, with a little
    thought, you wouldn't want to drink from. The factor
    being, not the chances of the horrible icky countryside
    dirtying that nice clean water, rather more along the
    lines of what is the likelihood of human despoilation? The
    greater the numbers of people likely to have frequented an
    area the greater the likelihood of the surrounding water
    being fouled.

    IMHO the Trail test focussed on these areas.... mind you I
    fully agree with them on that because they would want to
    "warn" the average punter about the potential problems in
    the most commonly visited places... the fact that the water
    they sampled was so "dirty" illustrates perfectly that the
    average punter needs warning about the dangers... else why
    is the water so dirty in the first place?

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    thenmc.org.ukindex.php

    NMC website: thenmc.org.ukthenmc.org.uk

  7. Steve said:

    IMHO the Trail test focussed on these areas.... mind you I
    fully agree with them on that because they would want to
    "warn" the average punter about the potential problems in
    the most commonly visited places...

    Fair comment. Shame there was the front cover "you are
    doomed" implying headline though...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext.
    33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177
    Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  8. Steve Orrell wrote

    Quoted message said:

    That said I'd be as interested in hearing experience of
    others using filters [abroad?].

    There's an interesting discussion about filtering water and
    disease-causing nasties, particularly though not exclusively
    giardia, at yosemite.orgGiardia.htm

    It's quite long, so here are some potted highlights:

    ...Untreated Sierra Nevada water should be, almost
    everywhere, safe to drink-if you "drink smart." If you don't
    "drink smart" you may ingest diarrhea-causing organisms. But
    it won't be Giardia....

    ...Our wilderness managers are in a position to educate the
    outdoor public about the real culprit in the Giardia lamblia
    story: inadequate human hygiene...

    ..."Given the casual approach to personal hygiene that
    characterizes most backpacking treks, hand washing is likely
    to be a much more useful preventative strategy than water
    disinfection! This simple expedient, strictly enforced in
    health care, child care, and food service settings, is
    rarely mentioned in wilderness education materials."...

    Now the Lake District isn't the Sierra Nevada and the way we
    use our hills, and the pressure on them, is very different
    from that in the US, but the thrust of the argument remains
    valid: you're probably going to be OK if you apply some
    common sense to where you get your water from. As Steve, and
    others, have pointed out the need is to educate people as to
    where they should get their water from and how their
    'activities' in the hills might adversely affect others.

    T.

  9. Judith said:

    I know this question crops up from time to time but
    googling has raised more questions than it answers!

    I would like to buy a water filter for use when
    backpacking.

    My criteria are:

    1. Lightweight and small.
    2. Usable throughput - ie I don't want to spend ages
    generating half a cup of water.
    3. "Better" than Iodine on its own, which is what I
    use now.

    The two that I am considering are the Pre Mac Travel Well
    Pocket and the MSR WaterWorks EX filter. Does anyone have
    practical experience of these?


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    I'd appreciate any experience you can share.

    Cheers Judith

    You don't say what type of backpacking you are doing - high
    mountainous areas or low/mid level trails.

    There is always a risk, but in high areas, for healthy
    people choosing their water source sensibly, it is reduced
    to a very tiny level. Certainly on high and mid level
    routes, we have never had any problems with streams in a
    variety of landscapes, including rocky areas, peat moorland,
    grassy mid-height hills etc. We just avoid tarns (and
    streams issuing from them) in popular areas.

    Back to your question, we have never tried those particular
    filters and never use chemicals. We have a Katadyn filter
    but very rarely take it, we keep it for lowish level trails
    where there might be no other acceptable method (it's
    usually easier to buy it in those cases as such routes often
    pass near shops). The throughput is quite good provided you
    keep the element clean and brush away any accumulation of
    yuk regularly and pump some clean tap water through it
    before the trip. It filters out all physical nasties and no
    chemicals are necessary.

    Don't know if it's any help but you could read our view of
    it in our Wild Camping section at

    v-g.me.ukv-g.me.uk

    Regards

    -- GeoffC

  10. Peter Clinch said:
    Quoted message said:

    There is a significant(?) risk of liver fluke if there
    are sheep around.

    There are sheep around all across the UK. There are
    significant numbers of walkers who don't filter water. This
    is the first time I've heard anyone suggest liver flukes
    are a problem from untreated water, so I suspect that it
    isn't actually a big problem. According to google pond
    snails are an intermediary, which AFAICT aren't a major
    feature of running streams in hills, and the infection is
    picked up by animals from plants near the water when
    grazing. Though I certainly haven't done extensive research
    on how big a problem it is. I'd be interested in further
    info if it really is a problem.


    *Significant* is probably the wrong word, which is why I
    added the question mark. I first heard of liver fluke many
    years ago, (pre-internet and Google!) when I was walking the
    Pennine Way, backpacking. IIRC the effects of ingestion were
    rather nasty, so it was an easy decision not to drink
    untreated water, even if the risk was quite small. A search
    now suggests it can result in unpleasant rather than fatal
    results.
    bbc.co.ukliver fluke.shtml

    However, I have rarely managed to get much higher than the
    damned sheep can climb in this country, and I don't trust
    them not to poo in or near streams! ;-

  11. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Chris <proteus1@gmxDOTnet> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    There is a significant(?) risk of liver fluke if there are
    sheep around.

    The old joke is that liver fluke is something that old
    shepherds die from and as they lived to a ripe old age then
    obviously there is no problem. On a more serious note i
    would totally agree with Pete that all running water from
    upland areas in Scotland is perfectly safe to drink. My own
    rule of thumb is that i must be above the level of local
    farm buidings as i am wary of chemical run off from farms as
    farmers use some very dodgy chemicals.

    --
    Len Trim [email hidden]

  12. I have used the MSR filter for a while now and have found it
    very reliable. As a rule I would use it whenever you are
    taking water from a source that is lower than sheep/cattle.

    That you can directly screw the MSR into a Nalogene bottle
    is not that important as the hose feed can take water from
    any vesel. I usually filter the water directly into a
    platypus with drinking hose or a platypus water carrier -
    the versions with the top that opens (the big zip?) which
    can easily accommodate the shape of the MSR filter. Using
    this system you can load up a container with water and then
    filter it later.

    I used mine extensively in the Pyrenees last summer
    (remember how hot it was). On a couple of occasions I found
    myself making unscheduled wild camps high in the hill where
    I could only find the beginning trickle of streams. No doubt
    the water here was pure but it was impossible to get at it
    without it being very dirty. A couple of times I also took
    water from lakes where there were a lot of sheep.

    Of course, filtering dirty water means your filter gets
    dirty, but it is pretty easy to clean with a damp cloth.

    The MSR also claims to be a fast filter in that it draws
    water on both up and strokes of the lever (or something like
    that). It does take a while to filter a couple of litres but
    then when you need that water ....

    --
    Andy Howell Birmingham, UK

  13. On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:49:42 +0100, GeoffC <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Don't know if it's any help but you could read our view of
    it in our Wild Camping section at

    v-g.me.ukv-g.me.uk

    Yes, it's very handy. Good site. Thanks.

    Judith

  14. Andy Howell said:

    I have used the MSR filter for a while now and have found
    it very reliable. As a rule I would use it whenever you are
    taking water from a source that is lower than sheep/cattle.

    So, do you always carry it - just in case? Or do you only
    take it when you're going to an unknown area or to
    somewhere, as you say, below the sheep/cattle line?

    The MSR filter looks like it would do the job but, as other
    people have said, I've drunk from many streams and don't
    seem to be suffering any ill-effects. I'm not very fit, so
    adding a filter to my pack may mean that I can't make it up
    to the higher hills and the cleaner water!

    Judith.

  15. Judith said:
    Andy Howell said:

    I have used the MSR filter for a while now and have found
    it very reliable. As a rule I would use it whenever you
    are taking water from a source that is lower than
    sheep/cattle.

    So, do you always carry it - just in case? Or do you only
    take it when you're going to an unknown area or to
    somewhere, as you say, below the sheep/cattle line?

    The MSR filter looks like it would do the job but, as other
    people have said, I've drunk from many streams and don't
    seem to be suffering any ill-effects. I'm not very fit, so
    adding a filter to my pack may mean that I can't make it up
    to the higher hills and the cleaner water!

    Why not go for aquamira? No taste and as light as iodine.
    giardiaclub.comindex.php
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the
    "Westminster Gasworks"

  16. Judith said:

    So, do you always carry it - just in case? Or do you only
    take it when you're going to an unknown area or to
    somewhere, as you say, below the sheep/cattle line?

    I didn't know we had a sheep line in the UK. There's always
    sheep on top of Snowdon. How about Ben Nevis?

    Paul
    --
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukwildwales.fsnet.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

  17. Paul Saunders said:
    Judith said:

    So, do you always carry it - just in case? Or do you only
    take it when you're going to an unknown area or to
    somewhere, as you say, below the sheep/cattle line?

    I didn't know we had a sheep line in the UK. There's always
    sheep on top of Snowdon. How about Ben Nevis?

    No, deer. Again the biggest problem is people.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the
    "Westminster Gasworks"

  18. Peter Clinch said:

    Perhaps not what you're looking for, but at least in UK
    hills my experience is they're not worth the bother,
    because I don't have trouble drinking from burns.

    Agreed.

    Quoted message said:

    Much more convenient, and I've a pretty large sample base
    of drinks not to be worried from.

    Same here.

    You do have to apply some common sense, some water can be
    dodgy - near old industrial workings for example, or in
    low lying areas with farmland above, but on the whole
    there's little to worry about if you're careful. Even the
    odd dead sheep upstream isn't likely to kill you (well I'm
    still here).

    Just drink from the fast flowing stuff and avoid the scum.

    Paul
    --
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukwildwales.fsnet.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

  19. On 13/4/04 7:54 pm, in article [email hidden],

    Judith said:

    So, do you always carry it - just in case? Or do you only
    take it when you're going to an unknown area or to
    somewhere, as you say, below the sheep/cattle line?

    No I don't always carry it but do so when I am going to be
    (possibly) needing supplies of new water (as in the
    Pyrenees) or when wild camping.

    Everyone drinks out of streams occasionally but if I was
    going to be doing this very regularly then I would take it.
    The filter doesn't really weigh that much at all.

    --
    Andy Howell Birmingham, UK

  20. On 13/4/04 7:54 pm, in article [email hidden],

    Judith said:

    So, do you always carry it - just in case? Or do you only
    take it when you're going to an unknown area or to
    somewhere, as you say, below the sheep/cattle line?

    Thinking about this - if you think a filter might just help
    your peace of mind then seriously think about one. I see
    you've just been wild camping in North Wales - I suspect if
    I was doing this for a few days I would use my filter but
    then there are others that wouldn¹t' .....

    --
    Andy Howell Birmingham, UK

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.