Road Cycling · Public discussion

We know he is faster than Marco !!!

Started by SMMB · · Last activity · 15 posts · 336 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
28 July 2004
Last activity
30 July 2004
Original author
SMMB
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
336
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. But we didn't know why he couldn't set the record.

    From :

    Roue libre Les lieutenants aux «jambes de pierre»

    Par Antoine VAYER

    lundi 26 juillet 2004 (Liberation - 06:00)

    "Pour Christian Prudhomme, futur patron du
    Tour, Armstrong est «un dieu», tant il est vrai que Lance a marché sur
    les autres. Sa grâce divine a crucifié les outsiders, du moins ceux qui
    n'ont pas abandonné, les «mal-soignés»."

    "Seul hic à ce Tour de tous ses records personnels, un petit vent sur la deuxième partie de l'Alpe-d'Huez l'a empêché de battre celui de Pantani, qu'on pensait inapprochable."

    I guess the barriers got him, not the crowd.
    Me, too, if I had the genes, the dedication, etc., etc., ....

    --
    Sandy
    Paris FR

    *******

    La vie, c'est comme une bicyclette,
    il faut avancer pour ne pas perdre l'équilibre.
    -- Einstein, A.

  2. "SMMB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
    But we didn't know why he couldn't set the record.

    From :

    Roue libre Les lieutenants aux «jambes de pierre»

    Par Antoine VAYER

    lundi 26 juillet 2004 (Liberation - 06:00)

    "Pour Christian Prudhomme, futur patron du
    Tour, Armstrong est «un dieu», tant il est vrai que Lance a marché sur
    les autres. Sa grâce divine a crucifié les outsiders, du moins ceux qui
    n'ont pas abandonné, les «mal-soignés»."

    "Seul hic à ce Tour de tous ses records personnels, un petit vent sur la deuxième partie de
    l'Alpe-d'Huez l'a empêché de battre celui de Pantani, qu'on pensait inapprochable."

    I guess the barriers got him, not the crowd.
    Me, too, if I had the genes, the dedication, etc., etc., ....

    --
    Sandy
    Paris FR

    I take it you consider Pantani's record to be legit?

    M.

  3. Michael said:

    I take it you consider Pantani's record to be legit?

    Of course, why not?

  4. SMMB said:

    "Seul hic à ce Tour de tous ses records personnels, un petit vent sur la
    deuxième partie de l'Alpe-d'Huez l'a empêché de battre celui de Pantani,
    qu'on pensait inapprochable."

    Someone at the twelfth party on Alpe d'Huez farted and this is why he
    was a second slower than Pantani.

  5. "Stewart Fleming" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    SMMB said:

    "Seul hic à ce Tour de tous ses records personnels, un petit vent sur la
    deuxième partie de l'Alpe-d'Huez l'a empêché de battre celui de Pantani,
    qu'on pensait inapprochable."

    Someone at the twelfth party on Alpe d'Huez farted and this is why he
    was a second slower than Pantani.


    No, not the twelfth party, the second! The party of the second part will be
    known in this contract as the party of the second part. etc.

    Anyway, Pantani's record was 36'50, if you actually time it from betweeen
    the start and finish of the climb (like Lance's was). The 37'35 included the
    bit from the intersection of the D? and N? (too lazy to look it up) to the
    bottom of the climb.

    Jeff

  6. "Jeff Jones" <jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com> a écrit dans le message de :
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Stewart Fleming" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, Pantani's record was 36'50, if you actually time it from betweeen
    the start and finish of the climb (like Lance's was). The 37'35 included


    the

    Quoted message said:

    bit from the intersection of the D? and N? (too lazy to look it up) to the
    bottom of the climb.

    Jeff

    A helpful site :

    http://grimpee.alpe.9online.fr/references.html

    --
    Bonne route,

    Sandy
    Paris FR

  7. "SMMB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    A helpful site :

    http://grimpee.alpe.9online.fr/references.html


    Thanks - that site states that Pantani's 1995 record was 36'40, not 36'50.
    There is a similar difference between his 1997 times (36'45 and 36'55). Damn
    these facts. Oh well, all I know is that it's a hell of a lot faster than I
    can climb, and that's a fact.

    Jeff

  8. Jeff Jones said:
    SMMB said:

    http://grimpee.alpe.9online.fr/references.html


    Thanks

    What, you don't read frsc..?

  9. Jeff Jones said:

    "Stewart Fleming" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    SMMB said:

    "Seul hic à ce Tour de tous ses records personnels, un petit vent sur la
    deuxième partie de l'Alpe-d'Huez l'a empêché de battre celui de Pantani,
    qu'on pensait inapprochable."

    Someone at the twelfth party on Alpe d'Huez farted and this is why he
    was a second slower than Pantani.

    No, not the twelfth party, the second! The party of the second part will be
    known in this contract as the party of the second part. etc.

    OK, the second farty party.

    Quoted message said:

    the start and finish of the climb (like Lance's was). The 37'35 included the
    bit from the intersection of the D? and N? (too lazy to look it up) to the
    bottom of the climb.

    I have a 3000x3000 pixel satellite image, so I did a complex image
    transformation so that I could read the road signs. Crossroads of D211
    and N91.

  10. Stewart Fleming said:
    Jeff Jones said:

    the start and finish of the climb (like Lance's was). The 37'35
    included the bit from the intersection of the D? and N? (too lazy to
    look it up) to the bottom of the climb.

    I have a 3000x3000 pixel satellite image, so I did a complex image
    transformation so that I could read the road signs. Crossroads of
    D211 and N91.

    Damn, you're good!

    Jeff

  11. Jeff Jones said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a 3000x3000 pixel satellite image, so I did a complex image
    transformation so that I could read the road signs. Crossroads of
    D211 and N91.

    Damn, you're good!

    Especially since the crossing is not on the photo...

    (Ah OK, *a* satellite image).

  12. Jeff Jones said:
    Stewart Fleming said:
    Jeff Jones said:

    the start and finish of the climb (like Lance's was). The 37'35
    included the bit from the intersection of the D? and N? (too lazy to
    look it up) to the bottom of the climb.

    I have a 3000x3000 pixel satellite image, so I did a complex image
    transformation so that I could read the road signs. Crossroads of
    D211 and N91.

    Damn, you're good!

    We have a wide-ranging educational curriculum here in New Zealand.

  13. Ewoud Dronkert said:


    Especially since the crossing is not on the photo...

    (Ah OK, *a* satellite image).

    It was probably the one taken by the blimp next to ours. There's always a
    big fight for position among the Tour photographers.

    Jeff

  14. Jeff Jones said:
    Ewoud Dronkert said:

    Especially since the crossing is not on the photo...

    (Ah OK, *a* satellite image).

    It was probably the one taken by the blimp next to ours. There's always a
    big fight for position among the Tour photographers.

    It was the grey one with no markings.
    Can't say any more, sorry.

  15. Jeff Jones said:
    Quoted message said:

    It was probably the one taken by the blimp next to ours. There's always a
    big fight for position among the Tour photographers.

    Stewart Fleming said:

    It was the grey one with no markings.
    Can't say any more, sorry.

    Oh you mean the al Queada one ?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.