done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down that's
almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.
176/159/126
17 down, 33 to go
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down that's
almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.
176/159/126
17 down, 33 to go
It's excellent.
nanner wrote:
| done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down
| that's almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.
|
| 176/159/126
| 17 down, 33 to go
Good job.
When I first started LC at 367 lbs, I would mess up fairly frequently, but
as long as I stayed on plan most of the time, the weight still came off.
nanner wrote:
:: done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down
:: that's almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.
::
:: 176/159/126
:: 17 down, 33 to go
"nanner" <
Quoted message said:done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down
that's almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.176/159/126
17 down, 33 to go
Yeah, that's good. Staying on course always is better, and you're seeing
good results. Are you sure you need to go to 126? How tall are you?
Pat in TX
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:12:06 -0400, "nanner" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down that's
almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.176/159/126
17 down, 33 to go
That's great news, Nanner -- keep it up!
--
BlueBrooke
254/228/135
"Pat" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"nanner" <Quoted message said:done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down
that's almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.176/159/126
17 down, 33 to go
Yeah, that's good. Staying on course always is better, and you're seeing
good results. Are you sure you need to go to 126? How tall are you?Pat in TX
Quoted message said:
LOL That was one of my first posts. knowing that I'd get flack for my 126. i
am 5'3" and small. I can live comfortably at 130/133 but am clearly still
"overweight" at that size. I was 126 for years and years so that is the
number that I picked, it was my normal/average for so many years. also 176
to 126 makes an even 50, nice round number.
"BlueBrooke" <.@.> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:12:06 -0400, "nanner" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down
that's
almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.176/159/126
17 down, 33 to goThat's great news, Nanner -- keep it up!
--
BlueBrooke
254/228/135
Thanks BlueBrooke and everyone else 🙂
nanner said:done some more Yippee!! Lost 17lbs so far. So, even with my ups&down that's
almost 2lbs per week, pretty good IMO.176/159/126
17 down, 33 to go
Woo hoo! You go Nanner!
Myra
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.