Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Weight -- 531 vs. 853

Started by Matt O'Toole · · Last activity · 24 posts · 1,987 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 November 2003
Last activity
13 November 2003
Original author
Matt O'Toole
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,987
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–24 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have two nice lugged frames made with 531. Neither of them could claim to be 3.5 lbs, which is
    a common weight for modern steel frames. I don't know their exact weights, and have neither the
    scale nor the desire to strip the bikes down to a bare frame, but my guess would be closer to 5
    lbs in a 56 C-T size.

    This is the kind of answer I was looking for when I started this thread. I was hoping people
    familiar with various frames could give me some offhand/ballpark figures. I've got one, and yours
    is the second.

    Matt O.

    Dear Matt,

    It's a bit of a pain to get through the sign-up pages, but here's a sort of rec.bicycles.tech for
    frame-builders where you might get exact answers from people who live for this kind of question:

    phred.orgframebuilders

    Carl Fogel

  2. (Fabrizio Mazzoleni) said:

    Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    And I'll note the Golden Gate is still standing, as opposed to most lightweight framesets less
    than a tenth its age.

    Nonsense, you should be able to get a good two seasons out of a 1.05kg Dedacciai U2 frame set!

    And the Golden Gate was officially opened on May 27, 1937, and so has been standing for 66 years and
    6 months, or 266 seasons. So, by your own admission, a modern lightweight frameset has significantly
    less than one hundredth the lifetime of the Golden Gate Bridge.

    Jasper

  3. Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    (Fabrizio Mazzoleni) said:

    Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    And I'll note the Golden Gate is still standing, as opposed to most lightweight framesets less
    than a tenth its age.

    Nonsense, you should be able to get a good two seasons out of a 1.05kg Dedacciai U2 frame set!

    And the Golden Gate was officially opened on May 27, 1937, and so has been standing for 66 years
    and 6 months, or 266 seasons. So, by your own admission, a modern lightweight frameset has
    significantly less than one hundredth the lifetime of the Golden Gate Bridge.

    Jasper

    Dear Jasper,

    But that's all that the bridge has been doing--standing.

    It's probably afraid to move, lest its frame soften.

    Carl Fogel

  4. Carl Fogel said:

    Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    (Fabrizio Mazzoleni) said:

    Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    So, by your own admission, a modern lightweight frameset has significantly less than one
    hundredth the lifetime of the Golden Gate Bridge.

    Jasper

    Dear Jasper,

    But that's all that the bridge has been doing--standing.

    It's probably afraid to move, lest its frame soften.

    Carl Fogel

    Okay, ya hooked him, time to throw him back.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.