UK and Europe · Public discussion

What do you miss least.

Started by Roger Thorpe · · Last activity · 46 posts · 2,301 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
7 February 2003
Last activity
12 February 2003
Original author
Roger Thorpe
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,301
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a few
    of the things that I just can't understand how we tolerated.

    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were
    like when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid? Roger
    --
    Roger Thorpe

    My email address is spamtrapped. You can work it out!

  2. "Roger Thorpe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a
    few of the things that I just can't understand how we


    tolerated.

    Quoted message said:


    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were like
    when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid?

    Definately cotter pins, oh and toeclips and those rusteasy Eveready lights.

    Pete

  3. Peter B said:
    Quoted message said:

    Of what were you glad to be rid?

    Quoted message said:

    Definately cotter pins,

    Oh yes indeedy. And chromed steel mudguards. And pathetic lights. And stamped-out sidepull brakes on
    steel rims.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  4. "Roger Thorpe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a
    few of the things that I just can't understand how we


    tolerated.

    Quoted message said:


    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were like
    when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid? Roger
    --
    Roger Thorpe

    My email address is spamtrapped. You can work it out!

    I hated the brown rubber grips on old style brake levers. The sort that Durex must have made that
    disintegrated during the winter.

    Can I mention a bike? The Raleigh RSW. It seemed to be made of neutron star matter as it couldn't be
    lifted, or pedalled for that matter.

  5. "Roger Thorpe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a
    few of the things that I just can't understand how we


    tolerated.

    Quoted message said:


    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were like
    when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid? Roger
    --


    Gear shifters that required taking hands off the handlebars. 1 gear bikes, 3 gear bikes, 5 gear
    bikes, 10 gear bikes - although I could probably get by with the right 5.

  6. Roger Thorpe said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days.

    Quoted message said:

    Of what were you glad to be rid?

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some handlebars
    in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long distances still
    do that...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  7. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Roger Thorpe said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days.

    Quoted message said:

    Of what were you glad to be rid?

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some
    handlebars in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long
    distances still do that...

    But then some of us don't find it uncomfortable and actually enjoy it
    :-)

    Colin

  8. "Smudger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:b20lf2$1p7

    Quoted message said:

    Can I mention a bike? The Raleigh RSW. It seemed to be made of neutron star matter as it couldn't
    be lifted, or pedalled for that matter.


    You heathen! My first bike was a blue RSW 14 inherited from my brother. I loved it.

    We eventually converted it into a static bike.

    E

  9. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Smudger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:b20lf2$1p7

    Quoted message said:

    Can I mention a bike? The Raleigh RSW. It seemed to be made of neutron star matter as it
    couldn't be lifted, or pedalled for that matter.


    You heathen! My first bike was a blue RSW 14 inherited from my brother. I loved it.

    We eventually converted it into a static bike.

    Talking of static bikes did anyone else catch that quite disturbing image of Adam Hart Davis naked
    on the Velocipede Shower on TV last night some time?

    Colin

  10. Quoted message said:

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some
    handlebars in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long
    distances still do that...

    And many find it strangely enjoyable ...

    Cheers, helen s 🙂

    ~~~~~~~~~~
    Flush out that intestinal parasite and/or the waste product before sending a reply!

    Any speeliong mistake$ aR the resiult of my cats sitting on the keyboaRRRDdd
    ~~~~~~~~~~

  11. "wafflycathcsdirtycatlitter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some
    handlebars in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long
    distances still do that...

    And many find it strangely enjoyable ...

    And their souls remain in tact 🙂

  12. "Colin Blackburn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some
    handlebars in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long
    distances still do that...

    But then some of us don't find it uncomfortable and actually enjoy it
    :-)


    Snag is, once you've tried a bent, and felt just how comfy it is, nothing else quite feels the
    same again...

    Ho hum. Anyone know any unnattached millionairesses?

    E

  13. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Definately cotter pins,

    Oh yes indeedy. And chromed steel mudguards. And pathetic lights. And stamped-out sidepull brakes
    on steel rims.

    Oh. Oh dear. Ummm.

    Well my Indian bike has cotters (the left one will not fit properly in the best traditions of such
    things), very cheap, near ineffective brakes (stamped metal, sort of side pull) and steel rims.

    Plus it is made of neutron star dust to make it heavier.

    And I love it -- for the memories if not for its wonderful performance -- though it is a VERY
    comfortable bike to ride -- hard work up the hills though 🙁

    T

  14. Roger Thorpe deftly scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a
    few of the things that I just can't understand how we tolerated.

    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were like
    when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid? Roger

    Yellow plastic capes and sou' westers .. 😉

    Tyres that lasted generations, but had no grip whatsoever if it even looked like raining .. and
    brake blocks made of a similar compound, that refused to slow ( not too surprising I suppose ) a
    40lb bike in anything cooler than Death Valley temperatures. 😉

    --
    ...................................Paul-[censored] Seti 1399 wu in 10037 hours
    setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edusetiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu

  15. Peter B said:


    Definately cotter pins, oh and toeclips and those rusteasy Eveready lights.

    Pete

    Lights? oh yes. I seem to remember that Wonder lights seemed to be such a massive improvement. I
    wouldn't touch them now. Batteries that would pack up unpredictably and were stocked only by
    bike shops and the kind of wireless repair shop that also stocked valves and round pin plugs.
    Pathetic beam too.

    --
    Roger Thorpe

    My email address is spamtrapped. You can work it out!

  16. Peter Clinch said:

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some
    handlebars in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long
    distances still do that...

    Damn, beat me to it.

    --
    Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdanny ) Recumbent cycle page:
    speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbents "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
    Thomas Paine

  17. Colin Blackburn wrote:
    :: Talking of static bikes did anyone else catch that quite disturbing image of Adam Hart Davis
    :: naked on the Velocipede Shower on TV last night some time?
    ::

    Yeah, I saw it. One for the spinners among us - shower and cycle at the same time, quite funny
    really. Seemed like a lot of water was going on the floor - perhaps that was why it never caught on
    ;-). As for Adam Hart Davis.. disgusting!

    Rich

  18. Roger Thorpe said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a
    few of the things that I just can't understand how we tolerated.

    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were like
    when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid? Roger

    Those Puma shoes from the 70's with the white plastic soles and the "adjustable" shoe plates. Once
    you wore out the rubber adhesion strips on the heels they were lethal to walk in. But they were the
    height of fashion so you had to have them - especially when teamed with a sponsored head band and
    sweat bands for your wrists.

    Cheers! Stephen

  19. Colin Blackburn said:
    Quoted message said:

    Having to sit with my weight spread between a wee traingle of plastic or leather and some
    handlebars in an uncomfortable crouch for hours at a time. Of course, most people cycling long
    distances still do that...

    But then some of us don't find it uncomfortable and actually enjoy it
    :-)

    That's true, they are called cyclists.

  20. Paul - [censored] <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Roger Thorpe deftly scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking about how some aspects of cycling had got much better these days. Here are a
    few of the things that I just can't understand how we tolerated.

    1. Woollen shorts that itched and gave me a spectacular rash. Just imagine what they were like
    when wet.

    2. shoeplates that you had to nail onto your sole, with nails that often managed to poke through
    into your feet but still didn't manage to hold the plates on.

    3. Articulated trucks that didn't have underriders along the side.

    Of what were you glad to be rid? Roger


    how about pushrod brakes

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.