A prior posting by John Dacey (who made the effort to crush a 6500 just to
see) on this topic:
"John Dacey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Fallaces sunt rerum species." - Seneca On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:08:12 -0500, dvt
Quoted message said:On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:24:00 -0500, John Dacey
<[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:A full complement of 1/4" balls surrounding a spindle of this dimension seems not possible with
the space constraints.
Is it possible that the spindle has a smaller OD inside the cartridge? I haven't looked at this
newfangled fancy stuff, but it's possible that the spindle is only 26.7mm on the visible portion
of the BB.
Curious, I crushed the left sided of a worn 6500 cartidge yesterday to see what lay within. The
interior section of the spindle normally obscured from view _is_ stepped down somewhat from the Ø
of its visible ends, and the race upon which the balls orbit is cut even further into the spindle.
The bearing complement on the left side was seven 7/32" balls.
Thanks for the input on this. I actually bought / installed the 6500 yesterday. It took 2min to
install. Compared to the 45min I spent trying to get the old original 7700 to spin smoothly, it
was a dream.
"Mike Buckler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I've searched the web for a picture or drawing without success.
My UN-72 has developed a metallic double clicking sound, twice per
revolution,
Quoted message said:It feels OK when turned by hand, and there's no side to side play. I've
already
Quoted message said:taken it out of the frame and the threaded cups and shell look entirely
normal.
Quoted message said:
Does this sound indicate a pending terminal failure, or is it simply a
loose
Quoted message said:race inside the shell?. Should I be worried?
Mike