Road Cycling · Public discussion

Whatever happened to Michael Rasmussen?

Started by Kurgan Gringioni · · Last activity · 12 posts · 888 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
5 February 2008
Last activity
9 February 2008
Original author
Kurgan Gringioni
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
888
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Dumbasses -

    Just curious.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  2. Kurgan Gringioni said:

    Dumbasses -

    Just curious.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    He's in Mexico.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Kurgan Gringioni said:

    Dumbasses -

    Just curious.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    He's in Mexico.

    That's "New Italy" around here.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Whatever happened to
    Leon Trotsky?
    He got an icepick
    That made his ears burn.
    But I've already got a pitchfork...

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  4. Kurgan Gringioni said:

    Just curious.

    There was a tv documentary on him just the other day. He's living in
    Italy, training a few hours every day and preparing a law suit against
    his former employer. There was an arranged meeting between him and
    Cassani; there were awfully nice to each other. Rasmussen fully admits
    that he lied about where he was (not in Mexico but Pyrenees with
    Menchov and a soigneur, later Italy where he ran into Cassani) but
    contends that team management always knew. That part was convincing.
    There was not one question about /why/ he lied, though. Apparently
    it's personal.

    Conversation with MR is in English:
    http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=6437061 (I'm afraid it needs IE)

  5. Ted van de Weteringe said:

    There was not one question about /why/ he lied, though. Apparently
    it's personal.

    Is "personal" the new "motivated"?

  6. Kurgan Gringioni a écrit profondement:

    | Dumbasses -
    |
    |
    | Just curious.

    Max van Heeswijk, who used to ride for RobberBank, has said publicly
    tha "Everyone knew" that Rasmussen was not in Mexico

    And Davide Cassani has apologized to Rasmussen for blowing the whistle

    Anyway, the UCI had apparently concluded their investigation and sent
    their findings to the Monaco Federation where Rasmussen is/was
    registered.

    The Monaco Federation says it has not received anything from the UCI

    --
    Davey Crockett
    -
    Driving a Stake through the
    Heart of the Politically Correct

  7. John Forrest Tomlinson said:
    Ted van de Weteringe said:

    There was not one question about /why/ he lied, though. Apparently
    it's personal.

    Is "personal" the new "motivated"?

    It's super personal.

    Bob Schwartz

  8. On Feb 5, 3:20 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:58:11 +0100, Ted van de Weteringe

    Quoted message said:

    There was not one question about /why/ he lied, though. Apparently
    it's personal.

    Is "personal" the new "motivated"?

    I always assumed he lied because he didn't want his wife to know where
    he was. Funny, but he'd rather incur the wrath of UCI/WADA than his
    wife, if that's true.

  9. Scott said:

    On Feb 5, 3:20 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:58:11 +0100, Ted van de Weteringe

    Quoted message said:

    There was not one question about /why/ he lied, though. Apparently
    it's personal.

    Is "personal" the new "motivated"?

    I always assumed he lied because he didn't want his wife to know where
    he was. Funny, but he'd rather incur the wrath of UCI/WADA than his
    wife, if that's true.

    That's kind of cool, actually.

  10. On Feb 5, 6:49 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:10:19 -0800 (PST), Scott

    Quoted message said:

    I always assumed he lied because he didn't want his wife to know where
    he was. Funny, but he'd rather incur the wrath of UCI/WADA than his
    wife, if that's true.

    That's kind of cool, actually.

    Or terrifying...depending on the wife.

    R

  11. RicodJour said:

    On Feb 5, 6:49 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:10:19 -0800 (PST), Scott

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I always assumed he lied because he didn't want his wife to know where
    he was. Funny, but he'd rather incur the wrath of UCI/WADA than his
    wife, if that's true.

    Quoted message said:

    That's kind of cool, actually.

    Or terrifying...depending on the wife.

    IIRC, Rasmussen's wife is Mexican. I don't know
    if she was in Mexico at the time, and of course it's
    a big country, but it seems unlikely that he would
    tell her he was going to Mexico-of-all-places and
    then take off for Italy. Too easily found out.
    He could have said he was going to Snake Alley
    to train for the Nevada City Classic if he wanted
    to get away from the wife safely. Mexico sounds
    like it was intended to fool somebody other than
    his wife.

    Ben

  12. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:
    RicodJour said:

    On Feb 5, 6:49 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:10:19 -0800 (PST), Scott

    Quoted message said:

    >I always assumed he lied because he didn't want his wife to know where
    >he was. Funny, but he'd rather incur the wrath of UCI/WADA than his
    >wife, if that's true.

    Quoted message said:

    That's kind of cool, actually.

    Or terrifying...depending on the wife.

    IIRC, Rasmussen's wife is Mexican. I don't know
    if she was in Mexico at the time, and of course it's
    a big country, but it seems unlikely that he would
    tell her he was going to Mexico-of-all-places and
    then take off for Italy. Too easily found out.
    He could have said he was going to Snake Alley
    to train for the Nevada City Classic if he wanted
    to get away from the wife safely. Mexico sounds
    like it was intended to fool somebody other than
    his wife.

    Nothing like facts to ruin a good story.

    --
    Michael Press

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.