General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

When do postprandial bg's peak?

Started by Carterjp · · Last activity · 41 posts · 1,275 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 February 2004
Last activity
5 March 2004
Original author
Carterjp
Posts
41
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,275
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–41 of 41
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. To clarify, I do believe most docs are competent. However, I have seen docs play "fast and loose"
    with diagnostic criteria, such as IGT. It's prudent to do your own research on such items, I
    believe. The more involved in your own treatment and the more knowledgable you become, the better.
    The OGTT (glucose tolerance test) is notoriously unreliable. To diagnosis IGT, not only should the 2
    hr value be over 140 and less than 200, but it should be confirmed on a separate occasion. Carter's
    2 hr OGTT value of 116 is not far off from the average value of a normal group - 100. That, together
    with his normal fasting blood glucose and his normal Hba1c mean he is well within normal limits.
    What about his readings of over 200 on his meter? Well, he should certainly watch his diet and
    exercise more. This may be a wake up call that he is starting the progression first to IGT, then to
    T2.

    Mack© <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    (gman99) said:
    Mack© said:

    On 04 Mar 2004 16:52:51 GMT, [email hidden] (gman99) wrote:

    >[email hidden] (Brad Sheppard) wrote:
    >> If your MD doesn't understand or read diagnostic protocols, you did waste your time. MD's
    >> are not gods.
    >>
    >I see, so instead of seeing my MD or ANY MD for that matter I should simply list my
    >symptoms..etc on a NG and let the amateurs have at it. Gee...can you write a script for me too
    >that I can take to my local pharmacy ?

    that's not what the person said or even implied.


    That's what they DID imply...they implied that doctors are no good and that the diagnosis
    received on this NG was just as good...did you see the entire thread ??

    the statement made is written above, which literally means that the 1 doctor in question is not
    competent. The only implication is to get a new doctor. And it is true that not all people holding
    a medical license are qualified to do so or to practice in specific fields. The statement above
    does not say that all doctors are bad and that this group is better than a qualified doctor.

    Mack© Type 1 since 1975 alt-support-diabetes.orgalt-support-diabetes.org insulin-pumpers.orginsulin-pumpers.org

    In tribute to the United States of America and the State of Israel, two bastions of strength in a
    world filled with strife and terrorism.

    "To announce that there must be no criticism of the
    President, or that we are to stand by the President
    right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
    but is morally treasonable to the American public."

    ...Theodore Roosevelt

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.