Road positioning is a good example of a topic where a tidy universal answer can be less useful than a clear boundary. Advice can depend on the situation, but that should not turn every claim into an uncheckable matter of taste. Where there is uncertainty, saying what is uncertain seems more helpful than presenting one preference as a rule.
The practical value is keeping disagreement specific: people can explain what they would choose without implying everyone else is wrong, while safety-related claims still deserve scrutiny. For a road-positioning discussion, what should a forum treat as a matter of rider preference, and what should it leave unresolved until there is evidence to support a firmer answer?