General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

where to correctly measure braising temperature?

Started by Openmac · · Last activity · 16 posts · 2,480 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 July 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
Openmac
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,480
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. hi,

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven won't
    reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ), I'd like to
    "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    where in the pot is best to measure the temperature with a
    digital probe, and what is the 'right' temperature for a
    'slow braise'?

    e.g., a 3# veal shank, sitting on top of rutabaga &
    carrot quarters in a wine braising liquid, inside a
    LeCresuet pot.

    should the probe be placed:
    (f) in the braising liquid?
    (g) in the veal shank?
    (h) 'suspended' in mid-air in the pot?

    and, wherever's best, what are the 'right' temps?

    thanks,

    richard

  2. OpenMac said:

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven won't
    reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ), I'd like to
    "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    where in the pot is best to measure the temperature with a
    digital probe, and what is the 'right' temperature for a
    'slow braise'?

    e.g., a 3# veal shank, sitting on top of rutabaga & carrot
    quarters in a wine braising liquid, inside a LeCresuet
    pot.

    should the probe be placed:
    (a) in the braising liquid?

    Yes, in the liquid... if you must...

    Quoted message said:

    (b) in the veal shank?
    (c) 'suspended' in mid-air in the pot?

    and, wherever's best, what are the 'right' temps?

    Don't sweat it, I'd say. Braising is essentially simmering
    in a sealed vessel. So, just check if it does barely simmer
    a few times, that's all. As long as the food is surrounded
    by some watery liquid, the temperature won't exceed
    boiling, anyway.

    If you insist on sweating it, see, for example, <exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html>.

    Victor

  3. "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:200407021456507713%OpenMacNoSpam@RemoveMEspeakeasynet...

    Quoted message said:

    hi,

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven won't
    reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ), I'd like to
    "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    where in the pot is best to measure the temperature with a
    digital probe, and what is the 'right' temperature for a
    'slow braise'?

    e.g., a 3# veal shank, sitting on top of rutabaga & carrot
    quarters in a wine braising liquid, inside a LeCresuet
    pot.

    should the probe be placed:
    (a) in the braising liquid?
    (b) in the veal shank?
    (c) 'suspended' in mid-air in the pot?

    and, wherever's best, what are the 'right' temps?

    thanks,

    richard

    Don't worry about the temp. The important thing is that the
    liquid be bubbling slowly.

    --
    Peter Aitken

    Remove the [censored] from my email address before using.

  4. "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:200407021456507713%OpenMacNoSpam@RemoveMEspeakeasynet...

    Quoted message said:

    hi,

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven won't
    reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ), I'd like to
    "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    I braise at 300F. I have never seen a recipe specify
    braising below 225F.

  5. OpenMac said:

    hi,

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven won't
    reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ), I'd like to
    "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    Braising isn't done in an oven with a lower temp than that.
    What recipe calls for temps below 225? If you have a recipe
    like that, ditch it.

    Get a decent cookbook and read about braising. Forget
    measuring temps, forget precision here. This is one of the
    most forgiving methods of cooking.

    Pastorio

    Quoted message said:

    where in the pot is best to measure the temperature with a
    digital probe, and what is the 'right' temperature for a
    'slow braise'?

    e.g., a 3# veal shank, sitting on top of rutabaga & carrot
    quarters in a wine braising liquid, inside a LeCresuet
    pot.

    should the probe be placed:
    (a) in the braising liquid?
    (b) in the veal shank?
    (c) 'suspended' in mid-air in the pot?

    and, wherever's best, what are the 'right' temps?

    thanks,

    richard

  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    should the probe be placed:
    (a) in the braising liquid?

    Yes, in the liquid... if you must...

    ok.

    Quoted message said:


    Don't sweat it, I'd say. Braising is essentially simmering
    in a sealed vessel. So, just check if it does barely
    simmer a few times, that's all. As long as the food is
    surrounded by some watery liquid, the temperature won't
    exceed boiling, anyway.

    so, the next question (argument?) is HOW MUCH liquid? ...
    i've heard/read everything from "just a half inch deep"
    to "1/3 of the meat should be submerged" to "barely
    covered" ...

    Quoted message said:


    If you insist on sweating it, see, for example, <exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html>.

    This is an excellent site! speaks to the (former) cone-
    head in me ...

    thx!

    richard

  7. Vox Humana said:


    "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:200407021456507713%OpenMacNoSpam@RemoveMEspe-
    akeasynet...

    Quoted message said:

    hi,

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven won't
    reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ), I'd like
    to "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    I braise at 300F. I have never seen a recipe specify
    braising below 225F.

    won't that have your liquid at a hearty, rolling boil?

    if braising requires a simmering liquid, and simmering
    occurs in the 180-200 range (for low, med, high simmer ...),
    what's, then , going on in your 300F braise?

  8. Quoted message said:

    Braising isn't done in an oven with a lower temp than
    that. What recipe calls for temps below 225? If you have a
    recipe like that, ditch it.

    Get a decent cookbook and read about braising. Forget
    measuring temps, forget precision here. This is one of the
    most forgiving methods of cooking.

    Pastorio

    you've apparently never had a whole beef shank slow-braised
    over a low-simmer for 6-8 hours ... to each his own.

  9. "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:2004070217284316807%OpenMacNoSpam@speakeasynet...

    Quoted message said:
    Vox Humana said:


    "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:200407021456507713%OpenMacNoSpam@RemoveMEs-
    peakeasynet...

    Quoted message said:

    hi,

    when slow braising on a stovetop (cuz my silly oven
    won't reach/maintain a stable temp below 225F ... ),
    I'd like to "monitor & mmanage" the temp.

    I braise at 300F. I have never seen a recipe specify
    braising below


    225F.

    Quoted message said:


    won't that have your liquid at a hearty, rolling boil?

    if braising requires a simmering liquid, and simmering
    occurs in the 180-200 range (for low, med, high simmer
    ...), what's, then , going on in your 300F braise?

    You aren't going to get any simmering unless the liquid is
    at the boiling point. At sea level, that would be 212F. At
    180F you are just giving it a nice sauna. Three-hundred is
    a pretty common temperature for braising. Some people go
    to 325. Give it a try, it will be lots easier than what
    you proposed.

  10. OpenMac said:
    Quoted message said:

    Braising isn't done in an oven with a lower temp than
    that. What recipe calls for temps below 225? If you have
    a recipe like that, ditch it.

    Get a decent cookbook and read about braising. Forget
    measuring temps, forget precision here. This is one of
    the most forgiving methods of cooking.

    Pastorio

    you've apparently never had a whole beef shank slow-
    braised over a low-simmer for 6-8 hours ... to each
    his own.

    First, before you decide to come after a professional chef,
    at least learn the correct terminology. Second, learn about
    the subject at hand. Third, Read what's on the screen before
    typing [censored]. How your crippled logic could possibly come up
    with as profoundly stupid a thing to say as this is simply
    boggling. Perhaps it's stimulated by your equally profound
    ignorance.

    By definition, braising is a slow, moist cooking method
    which, also by definition, is a forgiving way to cook. That
    means that timing isn't so significant. That means that
    temperature can vary appreciably from your listed temps,
    either as a constant or variably during the cook and still
    do the right job. It means that the amount of liquid can
    vary greatly and still get a good result. It means that
    stupid blunders like the ones you're very likely to make
    won't ruin the dish. Oh, braising is cooking *in* liquid,
    not *over* a low simmer. If you meant something else, you
    sure didn't say it very well.

    Beef shanks are properly cross-sectional cuts of beef leg
    bones, most often forelegs, but they can also be cut from
    the end of the round called the hindshank. Whole shanks
    are virtually never sold at retail. Typically, they're
    cut into about 2-inch lengths with a ring of meat
    surrounding the bone.

    Your ignorance and inexperience is showing. Don't try to
    argue from your scant knowledge, there are too many people
    who know better reading along.

    Parenthetically, I've had a whole sheep braised over a fire
    in a hammered copper pot out in the desert. There wasn't a
    thermometer or pseudo-scientist within a hundred miles.
    About every half-hour, somebody lifted the lid and poked a
    knife into the meat. When it was judged tender enough and
    smelled maddeningly succulent, we ate. It was a splendid,
    primitive meal.

    Pastorio

  11. Quoted message said:

    You aren't going to get any simmering unless the liquid is
    at the boiling point. At sea level, that would be 212F. At
    180F you are just giving it a nice sauna. Three-hundred is
    a pretty common temperature for braising. Some people go
    to 325. Give it a try, it will be lots easier than what
    you proposed.

    again, i'm after a long slow braise, and am interested in
    the best method for monitoring/controlling the temperature.

    as for the "simmer", that's not actually the case ...

    at 212F, the liquid is "boiling", not simmering.

    e.g., exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html

    "To keep meat tender yet safe during braising, you must
    maintain an important balance. Cooking temperatures must be
    high enough to kill microorganisms, yet not so high that the
    meat toughens. Use a thermometer to check the temperature of
    the surrounding stock and keep it at a simmer of 180 F/82
    C-190 °F/88 °C."

    from what i'm reading, 180-190F ~ "low" simmer, 190-200F ~
    "med simmer", 200-210F ~ "high" simmer, and > 212F, by
    def'n, is boiling.

    try it with a pot o' H20 and a probe thermometer ... you'll
    start seeing your first simmer bubbles ~ 180F ...

    richard

  12. OpenMac said:
    Quoted message said:

    You aren't going to get any simmering unless the liquid
    is at the boiling point. At sea level, that would be
    212F. At 180F you are just giving it a nice sauna. Three-
    hundred is a pretty common temperature for braising. Some
    people go to 325. Give it a try, it will be lots easier
    than what you proposed.


    =20
    again, i'm after a long slow braise, and am interested in
    the best method for monitoring/controlling the
    temperature.
    =20
    as for the "simmer", that's not actually the case ...
    =20
    at 212F, the liquid is "boiling", not simmering.
    =20
    e.g., exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html
    =20
    "To keep meat tender yet safe during braising, you must
    maintain an important balance. Cooking temperatures must
    be high enough to kill microorganisms, yet not so high
    that the meat toughens. Use a thermometer to check the
    temperature of the surrounding stock and keep it at a
    simmer of 180 F/82 C-190 =B0F/88 =B0C."

    Yeah. I went to the site and read the brilliance there.
    They're not a=20 very good source. "Braise" is French and
    means "ember." The original=20 method was to bury the lidded
    cast iron pot in the embers on the=20 hearth. Those
    primitive cooks understood that the interior of the pot=20
    would stay at or below boiling and didn't need any
    measurements to do=20 the right job..

    They make this assertion: "Too much space between the
    ingredients and=20 the lid allows steam to condense and drip
    from the lid's underside=20 onto the ingredients, diluting
    the rich sauce."

    They don't seem to grasp the notion that in their closed
    vessel, all=20 the liquid that's going to be involved is
    already in there. The steam=20 is the water from the liquid
    in the container. It comes up out of the=20 sauce and then
    drips back in. Good Dutch Oven lids have little nibs=20 that
    stick down into the pot to exactly drip the condensate back
    onto=20 the foods being cooked.

    Their "science" lacks a certain, I dunno, science...

    They can't seem to grasp that a closed container with water
    in it=20 won't exceed 212=B0F. They don't understand the way
    collagen works and=20 they have a flimsy grasp on what
    happens when proteins denature.=20 They're simply wrong
    about temperature effects on meats.

    I love amateurs with degrees in Home Ec.

    Clicking on their links get you to this dazzlement: " To
    keep the=20 tissues from drying during cooking, fish
    requires higher temperatures=20 and shorter cooking times
    than meat. A general rule of thumb for=20 cooking is 10
    minutes per inch of thickness, but this varies according=20
    to cooking method, heat intensity, and fish size. Use a
    cooking=20 thermometer to gauge doneness more precisely.
    Fish is cooked when a=20 thermometer (we recommend the
    slender digital kind) inserted into the=20 thickest part of
    the flesh reaches 140=B0 F."

    Really? Flounder should be cooked at higher temps than beef?
    They=20 never heard of poaching? En papillote?

    That "10 minutes" rule came from the Canadian Fisheries
    folks and=20 their rule is that it applies *irrespective* of
    cooking method and, to=20 my profound surprise, it works.
    You need to insert about 4-inches of=20 the stem of the
    thermo into food to get a decent reading, and then=20 it's
    an average over the length of the shaft. If you can't look
    at a=20 piece of fish and see when it's done, poke with your
    finger and see=20 when it's done, step away from the food.

    Quoted message said:

    from what i'm reading, 180-190F ~ "low" simmer, 190-200F ~
    "med simmer", 200-210F ~ "high" simmer, and > 212F, by
    def'n, is boiling.
    =20
    try it with a pot o' H20 and a probe thermometer ...
    you'll start seeing your first simmer bubbles ~ 180F ...

    Actually, you'll see bubbles way before that. They begin to
    form well=20 below 140=B0F as air collects on the "seeds" on
    the sides and bottom of=20 the vessel.

    But you keep missing the points. 1) In spite of what these
    two=20 non-cooks say on this web site, you don't need to
    monitor the=20 temperature inside the cooking vessel; the
    laws of physics do that for=20 you. 2) An attempt at
    constant monitoring of the temperature means=20 you're
    poking around into the process and losing vessel heat,
    which=20 needs to proceed essentially uninterrupted except
    for occasional=20 testing as you approach the end of the
    cook. 3) Cooking time isn't=20 very critical because once
    you get meat over about 180=B0F, not much=20 more will
    happen to it structurally until it gets to a boil and
    then=20 only after many hours.

    You are sophisticating yourself into paralysis. You are
    making an=20 essentially simple process into an angst-ridden
    foolishness. Your=20 grandmother did this and took care of
    real life as well.

    Pastorio

  13. Quoted message said:

    "Vox Humana"

    I braise at 300F.

    That's not possible (at sea level water boils at 212dF)
    unless you use a super duper pressure cooker and then you'd
    only cook whatever for about 4 minutes or less Idiot.

    ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =--- ---= Move
    UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
    *********
    "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without
    tribulation." Sheldon ````````````

  14. "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:2004070221334850073%OpenMacNoSpam@speakeasynet...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You aren't going to get any simmering unless the liquid
    is at the


    boiling

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    point. At sea level, that would be 212F. At 180F you are
    just giving


    it a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    nice sauna. Three-hundred is a pretty common temperature
    for braising. Some people go to 325. Give it a try, it
    will be lots easier than what


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    proposed.

    again, i'm after a long slow braise, and am interested in
    the best method for monitoring/controlling the
    temperature.

    as for the "simmer", that's not actually the case ...

    at 212F, the liquid is "boiling", not simmering.

    e.g., exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html

    "To keep meat tender yet safe during braising, you must
    maintain an important balance. Cooking temperatures must
    be high enough to kill microorganisms, yet not so high
    that the meat toughens. Use a thermometer to check the
    temperature of the surrounding stock and keep it at a
    simmer of 180 F/82 C-190 °F/88 °C."

    from what i'm reading, 180-190F ~ "low" simmer, 190-200F ~
    "med simmer", 200-210F ~ "high" simmer, and > 212F, by
    def'n, is boiling.

    try it with a pot o' H20 and a probe thermometer ...
    you'll start seeing your first simmer bubbles ~ 180F ...

    I would then recommend that you get an array of
    thermocouples and connect each one to an analog to digital
    converter. Connect the convert to a multi-channel board that
    allows you to transfer the data to a computer. On a separate
    I/) port, connect an interface device that is computable
    with the electronic oven controller in you oven. Write a
    custom software package that monitors the oven conditions
    and food temperature and keeps everything within a few
    hundredths of a degree of your desired internal meat
    temperature. Be sure to allow for the fact than most ovens
    vary as much as 25F +/- from the set temperature.

    In lieu of that, set your oven temperature at 300F, put you
    food in a heavy vessel with a tight fitting lid, and go
    away for three to four hours. Most people consider braising
    to be a "door slammer" technique. In other words, you slam
    the door and walk away. It's literally NOT rocket science.
    The type of food that one braises is generally lower cost
    cuts of meat that are tough, but big on flavor. If you
    don't believe me (or every cookbook ever written), go to
    the store, get a chuck roast, brown it, add liquid and
    seasoning, and put it in a 300F for four hours. I've been
    doing that for over 40 years and it works every time.

  15. Vox Humana said:

    "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:2004070221334850073%OpenMacNoSpam@speakeasynet...
    =20

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You aren't going to get any simmering unless the liquid
    is at the


    =20
    boiling
    =20

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    point. At sea level, that would be 212F. At 180F you are
    just giving=

    Quoted message said:

    =20
    it a
    =20

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    nice sauna. Three-hundred is a pretty common temperature
    for braising=


    =2E

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Some people go to 325. Give it a try, it will be lots
    easier than wha=


    t

    Quoted message said:

    =20
    you
    =20

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    proposed.

    again, i'm after a long slow braise, and am interested in
    the best method for monitoring/controlling the
    temperature.

    as for the "simmer", that's not actually the case ...

    at 212F, the liquid is "boiling", not simmering.

    e.g., exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html

    "To keep meat tender yet safe during braising, you must
    maintain an important balance. Cooking temperatures must
    be high enough to kill microorganisms, yet not so high
    that the meat toughens. Use a thermometer to check the
    temperature of the surrounding stock and keep it at a
    simmer of 180 F/82 C-190 =B0F/88 =B0C."

    from what i'm reading, 180-190F ~ "low" simmer, 190-200F ~
    "med simmer", 200-210F ~ "high" simmer, and > 212F, by
    def'n, is boiling.

    try it with a pot o' H20 and a probe thermometer ...
    you'll start seeing your first simmer bubbles ~ 180F ...


    =20 20
    I would then recommend that you get an array of
    thermocouples and conne=


    ct

    Quoted message said:

    each one to an analog to digital converter. Connect the
    convert to a multi-channel board that allows you to
    transfer the data to a computer.=


    On

    Quoted message said:

    a separate I/) port, connect an interface device that is
    computable wit=


    h the

    Quoted message said:

    electronic oven controller in you oven. Write a custom
    software packag=


    e

    Quoted message said:

    that monitors the oven conditions and food temperature and
    keeps everyt=


    hing

    Quoted message said:

    within a few hundredths of a degree of your desired
    internal meat temperature. Be sure to allow for the fact
    than most ovens vary as muc=


    h as

    Quoted message said:

    25F +/- from the set temperature.

    Jeez. <slaps forehead> Of course.

    Why didn't I think of that...? It's just so obvious when you
    see it,=20 knowwadImean?

    Pastorio

    Quoted message said:

    =20
    In lieu of that, set your oven temperature at 300F, put
    you food in a =


    heavy

    Quoted message said:

    vessel with a tight fitting lid, and go away for three to
    four hours. =


    Most

    Quoted message said:

    people consider braising to be a "door slammer" technique.
    In other wo=


    rds,

    Quoted message said:

    you slam the door and walk away. It's literally NOT rocket
    science. T=


    he

    Quoted message said:

    type of food that one braises is generally lower cost cuts
    of meat that=


    are

    Quoted message said:

    tough, but big on flavor. If you don't believe me (or
    every cookbook e=


    ver

    Quoted message said:

    written), go to the store, get a chuck roast, brown it,
    add liquid and seasoning, and put it in a 300F for four
    hours. I've been doing that f=


    or

    Quoted message said:

    over 40 years and it works every time.
    =20 20

  16. "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Vox Humana said:

    "OpenMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:2004070221334850073%OpenMacNoSpam@speakeasynet...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You aren't going to get any simmering unless the liquid
    is at the

    boiling

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    point. At sea level, that would be 212F. At 180F you are
    just giving

    it a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    nice sauna. Three-hundred is a pretty common temperature
    for braising. Some people go to 325. Give it a try, it
    will be lots easier than what

    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    proposed.

    again, i'm after a long slow braise, and am interested in
    the best method for monitoring/controlling the
    temperature.

    as for the "simmer", that's not actually the case ...

    at 212F, the liquid is "boiling", not simmering.

    e.g., exploratorium.edu2 1
    03article.html

    "To keep meat tender yet safe during braising, you must
    maintain an important balance. Cooking temperatures must
    be high enough to kill microorganisms, yet not so high
    that the meat toughens. Use a thermometer to check the
    temperature of the surrounding stock and keep it at a
    simmer of 180 F/82 C-190 °F/88 °C."

    from what i'm reading, 180-190F ~ "low" simmer, 190-200F ~
    "med simmer", 200-210F ~ "high" simmer, and > 212F, by
    def'n, is boiling.

    try it with a pot o' H20 and a probe thermometer ...
    you'll start seeing your first simmer bubbles ~ 180F ...

    I would then recommend that you get an array of
    thermocouples and connect each one to an analog to digital
    converter. Connect the convert to a multi-channel board
    that allows you to transfer the data to a computer.


    On

    Quoted message said:

    a separate I/) port, connect an interface device that is
    computable with


    the

    Quoted message said:

    electronic oven controller in you oven. Write a custom
    software package that monitors the oven conditions and
    food temperature and keeps


    everything

    Quoted message said:

    within a few hundredths of a degree of your desired
    internal meat temperature. Be sure to allow for the fact
    than most ovens vary as much


    as

    Quoted message said:

    25F +/- from the set temperature.

    Jeez. <slaps forehead> Of course.

    Why didn't I think of that...? It's just so obvious when you
    see it, knowwadImean?

    Pastorio

    You aren't watching enough Alton Brown or reading Cook's
    Illustrated!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.