UK and Europe · Public discussion

which bb?

Started by Terry · · Last activity · 10 posts · 695 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 December 2003
Last activity
29 December 2003
Original author
Terry
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
695
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My bottom bracket on the old 531 audax bike needs replacing. 68mm frame width and 107mm axle,
    tapered square of course. I was going for a shimano 173 but then noticed that the campag bb's on
    wiggle are really cheap by comparison. I don't know if they are cartridge type, which I would
    prefer. What is the catch?(Apart from the fact that I havn't got a campag bb tool-do I need one to
    fit them?.) TerryJ

  2. Terry scribed with passion and wit:

    Quoted message said:

    My bottom bracket on the old 531 audax bike needs replacing. 68mm frame width and 107mm axle,
    tapered square of course. I was going for a shimano 173 but then noticed that the campag bb's on
    wiggle are really cheap by comparison. I don't know if they are cartridge type, which I would
    prefer. What is the catch?(Apart from the fact that I havn't got a campag bb tool-do I need one to
    fit them?.) TerryJ


    I swear by Campag, the tool is different but you may be able to borrow one from a local workshop,
    I've loaned mine out from tile to time.

    --
    Ian

    catrike.co.ukcatrike.co.uk

  3. Terry said:

    My bottom bracket on the old 531 audax bike needs replacing. 68mm frame width and 107mm axle,
    tapered square of course. I was going for a shimano 173 but then noticed that the campag bb's on
    wiggle are really cheap by comparison.

    ...Even cheaper elsewhere, believe it or not! All Wiggle's Campag prices are over the top.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if they are cartridge type, which I would prefer. What is the catch?(Apart from the
    fact that I havn't got a campag bb tool-do I need one to fit them?.)

    Unfortunately Campag's taper specification is slightly different from Shimano's and so not safely
    compatible with cranks that fit Shimano BBs; also there won't be a length close enough to 107mm.
    Campag's are 102, 111 and 115.5. The better quality Tacx tools are best for Campag BBs (and
    Shimano's and others for that matter) as others tend to slip. These cost more than the BB! Parker
    International and Xpedia sell them (as well as cheaper alternatives).

    I don't know the "173" but Shimano UN72 and UN73 seems to be well respected and I would expect to be
    of about equal quality to Campag Veloce or Centaur. That's the one I'm suggesting as a replacement
    for my brother's MTB. Chain Reaction's price is only £16.99, with free post as well:
    www.chainreactioncycles.com/viewproduct.asp?category=Bottom+Brackets&Model ID=49

    ~PB

  4. Quoted message said:
    Terry said:

    I don't know if they are cartridge type, which I would prefer.

    Campag's are all cartridge type, except for normal Chorus and Record models.

    ~PB

  5. Pete Biggs <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : I don't know the "173" but Shimano UN72 and UN73 seems to be well respected and I would expect to
    : be of about equal quality to Campag Veloce or Centaur.

    Personally I'd say

    UN52 ~ Veloce.

    Though with different virtues. The UN52 is lighter, Veloce will last longer.

    The UN72 is a very nice BB and is Centaur, and yup, I'd say they were pretty similar in quality.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  6. On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:55:18 -0000, "Pete Biggs"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    cut

    Quoted message said:

    Chain Reaction's price is only £16.99, with free post as well:
    www.chainreactioncycles.com/viewproduct.asp?category=Bottom+Brackets&Model ID=49

    Thank you for posting that Pete, I need a new BB for a fixed gear project I will be looking at after
    Christmas, a UN72/73 for £17 sounds perfect. I had a quick look at the headsets available from them
    and I quite like the look of the FSA UF model for£20.00 has anybody had problems with these? A quick
    google did not reval anything nasty. Cheers Richard Please remove THIS if replying

    "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle I no longer despair for the future of the human race".
    H. G. Wells

  7. Pete Biggs <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:

    The better quality Tacx tools are best for Campag BBs (and Shimano's and others for that matter) as
    others tend to slip. These cost more than the BB! Parker International and Xpedia sell them (as
    well as cheaper alternatives).

    Unfortunately they are only suitable for shorter BBs, as I found last week. Fine for taking out a
    107mm UN72 (XT), but when I tried to fit a 122mm UN53 (Zephyr), the splines got nowhere near the
    fixed cup before the axle bolt hit.

    Andrew

  8. k.

    Quoted message said:

    Fine for taking out a 107mm UN72 (XT), but when I tried to fit a 122mm UN53 (Zephyr), the splines
    got nowhere near the fixed cup before the axle bolt hit.

    I think I may be doing it wrongly then.Do you replace the axle bolt to keep the bb tool in place? I
    do not , and have difficulty with it slipping.Always have! It sounds as though some kind of big
    washer is required for the longer axle.

    Come to think of it, my current chainset has the axle bolt built in, so I would have to raid the
    bits box. TerryJ

  9. Terry said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fine for taking out a 107mm UN72 (XT), but when I tried to fit a 122mm UN53 (Zephyr), the splines
    got nowhere near the fixed cup before the axle bolt hit.

    I think I may be doing it wrongly then.Do you replace the axle bolt to keep the bb tool in place?

    I think the above refers to the type of Tacx tool with the built-in spring-loaded bolt to keep the
    tool in place. This is used without the BB spindle (axle) bolts or anything else. See www.tacx.nl

    I wasn't aware the tool couldn't handle long BB spindles. That's a shame as it's such a good
    design generally (great for Campag Mirage/Veloce/Centaur so I expected the Shimano version would
    be good too).

    Quoted message said:

    I do not , and have difficulty with it slipping.Always have! It sounds as though some kind of big
    washer is required for the longer axle.

    Try using a rear wheel quick release skewer if BB spindle is hollow, or longer bolt.

    ~PB

  10. Pete Biggs <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:
    Andrew said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fine for taking out a 107mm UN72 (XT), but when I tried to fit a 122mm UN53 (Zephyr), the
    splines got nowhere near the fixed cup before the axle bolt hit.

    I think the above refers to the type of Tacx tool with the built-in spring-loaded bolt to keep the
    tool in place. This is used without the BB spindle (axle) bolts or anything else. See www.tacx.nl

    I wasn't aware the tool couldn't handle long BB spindles. That's a shame as it's such a good
    design generally (great for Campag Mirage/Veloce/Centaur so I expected the Shimano version would
    be good too).

    That's the one. I think it's due to the length of the BB spindle - the various different versions
    (Campag, Shimano square, Shimano splined etc) all look much the same in terms of the length of the
    spring-loaded section, which is what's going to matter. I was a bit disappointed, having paid all
    the extra dosh for it. To be fair, all the Shimano chainsets use short axles, so if you stick to the
    standard it would be OK.

    In the end, I used a standard remover, a big washer, a couple of headset spacers, and the normal
    axle bolt. The downside is that you have to keep adjusting the axle bolt rather than rely on the
    spring to do it for you.

    Andrew

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.