(concatenated your two messages)
Quoted message said:Actually that's even worse. Sonarrat hasn't been a troll
that I've noticed and usually had something to say that
you would want to read. Pot shots at Lance are a bit
"in" aren't they? I'm actually not a great Lance fan
because he's too mechanical for my tastes. But a winner
is a winner and someone telling us that he'd rather a
bunch of also-rans won is pretty unreal. Let's face it,
there were plenty of the "Anyone but Merckx" crowd
during Eddy's day.
I'm not trolling, because I believe what I say; I don't
think "a winner is a winner," no matter how you look at it.
In particular, from the spectator's point of view, we're
just in it for the entertainment and catharsis. That's what
spectator sports are about. If you're in it to be an
analyst, well, you ought to be making money off of it.
Catharsis comes from uncertainty, revelation... now the '03
Vuelta was incredibly exciting, because on the one hand, you
had Isidro Nozal putting a minute and a half into David
Millar, and on the other, you had Alejandro Valverde scaring
the living hell out of everyone. Then finally, Roberto Heras
turned the race sideways and though it was anticlimactic
because the underdog didn't win, it was incredible to watch
Heras flying up that mountain.
There was plenty of catharsis in the '03 Tour, too, but
Lance only contributed to it himself in terms of almost
losing. (This was true whether you are a fan of his or not,
by the way.)
Quoted message said:My appologies to Sonarrat if I misunderstood his postings.
But the anti-Lance talk does get as boring as Brian
Lafferty's "Every pro is a doper".
That's my point!!!!! Once his career ends, hopefully, the
Lance talk will, too! And hopefully nobody else will win it
5 times for a long while to come, because variety keeps the
sport interesting.
-Sonarrat.