Road Cycling · Public discussion

Why I like George....

Started by Tim Mullin · · Last activity · 58 posts · 1,679 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
11 April 2004
Last activity
15 April 2004
Original author
Tim Mullin
Posts
58
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,679
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–58 of 58
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (concatenated your two messages)

    Quoted message said:

    Actually that's even worse. Sonarrat hasn't been a troll
    that I've noticed and usually had something to say that
    you would want to read. Pot shots at Lance are a bit
    "in" aren't they? I'm actually not a great Lance fan
    because he's too mechanical for my tastes. But a winner
    is a winner and someone telling us that he'd rather a
    bunch of also-rans won is pretty unreal. Let's face it,
    there were plenty of the "Anyone but Merckx" crowd
    during Eddy's day.

    I'm not trolling, because I believe what I say; I don't
    think "a winner is a winner," no matter how you look at it.
    In particular, from the spectator's point of view, we're
    just in it for the entertainment and catharsis. That's what
    spectator sports are about. If you're in it to be an
    analyst, well, you ought to be making money off of it.

    Catharsis comes from uncertainty, revelation... now the '03
    Vuelta was incredibly exciting, because on the one hand, you
    had Isidro Nozal putting a minute and a half into David
    Millar, and on the other, you had Alejandro Valverde scaring
    the living hell out of everyone. Then finally, Roberto Heras
    turned the race sideways and though it was anticlimactic
    because the underdog didn't win, it was incredible to watch
    Heras flying up that mountain.

    There was plenty of catharsis in the '03 Tour, too, but
    Lance only contributed to it himself in terms of almost
    losing. (This was true whether you are a fan of his or not,
    by the way.)

    Quoted message said:

    My appologies to Sonarrat if I misunderstood his postings.
    But the anti-Lance talk does get as boring as Brian
    Lafferty's "Every pro is a doper".

    That's my point!!!!! Once his career ends, hopefully, the
    Lance talk will, too! And hopefully nobody else will win it
    5 times for a long while to come, because variety keeps the
    sport interesting.

    -Sonarrat.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Other Jeff Jones) said:

    Here are some examples of ideal situations:

    Joseba Beloki DNS, Sylvain Chavanel takes up the mantle
    and wins.

    Maybe in a couple-three years for Chavanel.

    Quoted message said:

    Iban Mayo and Haimar Zubeldia 1-2 in Paris, or vice versa.

    The first choice would be fine with me.

    Quoted message said:

    Christophe Moreau finally comes out of his shell.

    And...?

    Quoted message said:

    Bobby Julich finally lives up to his potential.

    He may have already done that in '98 (though he is riding
    pretty well this year).

    Quoted message said:

    Levi Leipheimer redeems.

    S&H Green Stamps.

    Quoted message said:

    Tyler Hamilton puts in a thrilling solo attack into Paris
    and beats Ullrich on the last day.

    And the whole peloton beats him to a pulp for attacking
    on the last day.

    Quoted message said:

    Roberto Heras beats his former team leader into the
    ground, with the help of Christian Vandevelde and
    Isidro Nozal.

    You are talking about the Tour, right? (Though I'd be
    thrilled to see Heras do really well at the Tour...)

    How about adding Basso in this somewhere?

    Quoted message said:


    Here are some examples of bad outcomes:

    Lance Armstrong breaks the record and we all suffer
    through one more year of Krispy Kreme trolls on
    rec.bicycles.racing. Jan Ullrich comes back from crashing
    his drunk ass into a bike rack and repeats his 1997
    victory, having won nothing else the entire season.

    --
    tanx, Howard

    Q: Can we call it a quagmire yet?

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Other Jeff Jones said:

    Jeff Jones wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure we can come up with some better demarcation
    than this though. I had no problem with Sonarrat.

    cheers, Jeff (the other other Jeff Jones)

    I'm sure that we can come to some kind of an agreement.
    Perhaps I can switch back to Sonarrat, and you can see if
    you can get me an internship over the summer. I don't eat
    much. (Only half joking.)

    Nah, I just thought it would be funny to do this. Since
    you don't agree, I'll change back after sending this
    message.

    Well, you could by "OJJ", but then I'd eventually ask you
    how the search for the real killers is going.

    --
    tanx, Howard

    Q: Can we call it a quagmire yet?

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  4. John Everett <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Well of course! Great champions are not defined by their
    race results, like winning five TdFs in a row. It's their
    interview technique that truly defines them.

    Dude, there is a difference between winning a whole lot and
    being a great champion. It's a subjective thing, to be sure,
    and I believe an athlete's character is part of the
    equation. By your way of thinking Mike Tyson is in

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Howard Kveck said:
    Quoted message said:

    Here are some examples of ideal situations:

    Joseba Beloki DNS, Sylvain Chavanel takes up the mantle
    and wins.


    Maybe in a couple-three years for Chavanel.

    Sure. It would be a nice surprise, though, and the French
    would be thrilled. So would I.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Iban Mayo and Haimar Zubeldia 1-2 in Paris, or vice
    versa.


    The first choice would be fine with me.

    Zubeldia has been alarmingly off form so far this season,
    though, so Mayo may be a more realistic pick.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Christophe Moreau finally comes out of his shell.


    And...?

    And Lance punctures on the shell. 😉

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Bobby Julich finally lives up to his potential.


    He may have already done that in '98 (though he is riding
    pretty well this year).

    Could be.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tyler Hamilton puts in a thrilling solo attack into
    Paris and beats Ullrich on the last day.


    And the whole peloton beats him to a pulp for attacking on
    the last day.

    And that's not exciting? 😉

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Roberto Heras beats his former team leader into the
    ground, with the help of Christian Vandevelde and Isidro
    Nozal.


    You are talking about the Tour, right? (Though I'd be
    thrilled to see Heras do really well at the Tour...)

    Yes. How often have you seen Heras pacing Armstrong, and he
    has to go up to Heras and tell him to slow down?

    Quoted message said:

    How about adding Basso in this somewhere?

    Why not? He's good enough. Or how about Vinokourov vs.
    Ullrich - one of them says the wrong thing and they get
    turned against each other? Or maybe Dario Frigo will make
    something happen? Or maybe Gilberto Simoni manages to do
    the double?

    My point is, there are a lot of better things that could
    happen than Armstrong's 6th.

    -Sonarrat.

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Howard Kveck said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Other

    Jeff Jones said:

    Jeff Jones wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure we can come up with some better demarcation
    than this though. I had no problem with Sonarrat.

    cheers, Jeff (the other other Jeff Jones)

    I'm sure that we can come to some kind of an agreement.
    Perhaps I can switch back to Sonarrat, and you can see
    if you can get me an internship over the summer. I don't
    eat much. (Only half joking.)

    Nah, I just thought it would be funny to do this. Since
    you don't agree, I'll change back after sending this
    message.

    Well, you could by "OJJ", but then I'd eventually ask
    you how the search for the real killers is going.

    We could both use our middle initials...

    He could put Ph.D. after his name, and I could put Mus.D...
    (but that's still 10 years off.)

    Or he could adopt me, and then I'd be Jeff Jones, Jr...

    Or I could just post as Jeff Jones and let the poor newbies
    figure out who is who the hard way.

    (;

    -Sonarrat.

  7. peterwright <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    A winner never admits they were beaten by a better man -
    that would be facing the fact that someone out there is
    better than you. A winner who loses just got unlucky on
    the day...there is no one better.

    You have got to stop reading those Tony Robbins books.

  8. Tim Mullin said:

    ....better than Lance.

    After today's PR, Hincape admits he just didn't have the
    legs after making the break with Museeuw. No [censored]
    excuses, just an honest admission of what every cyclist
    knows--some days the other guy is just faster than you.

    Lance, on the other hand, always seems to have an excuse.
    A hunger knock. The other guy warmed up in air
    conditioning. Everything, it seems, this side of the Vast
    Right Wing Conspiracy. Why can't he admit that--plain and
    simple--on that day the other guy rode a better race? Not
    the hallmark of a great champion in my book.

    Yeah, the other George is showing how to give full props to
    your opponent. The other George made no mistakes, he did
    everything anyone could possibly
    do. Not only does he himself refuse to examine whether any
    mistakes were made, he doesn't want anyone else to
    examine it either.

    QUESTION: You've looked back before 9-11 for what mistakes
    might have been made. After 9-11, what would your biggest
    mistake be, would you say, and what lessons have learned
    from it? BUSH: I wish you'd have given me this written
    question ahead of time so I could plan for it.

    John, I'm sure historians will look back and say, gosh, he
    could've done it better this way or that way. You know, I
    just -- I'm sure something will pop into my head here in the
    midst of this press conference, with all the pressure of
    trying to come up with answer, but it hadn't yet.

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Robert Chung said:
    Tim Mullin said:

    ....better than Lance.

    After today's PR, Hincape admits he just didn't have the
    legs after making the break with Museeuw. No [censored]
    excuses, just an honest admission of what every cyclist
    knows--some days the other guy is just faster than you.

    Lance, on the other hand, always seems to have an
    excuse. A hunger knock. The other guy warmed up in air
    conditioning. Everything, it seems, this side of the
    Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. Why can't he admit that--
    plain and simple--on that day the other guy rode a
    better race? Not the hallmark of a great champion in
    my book.

    Yeah, the other George is showing how to give full props
    to your opponent. The other George made no mistakes, he
    did everything anyone could possibly
    do. Not only does he himself refuse to examine whether any
    mistakes were made, he doesn't want anyone else to
    examine it either.

    QUESTION: You've looked back before 9-11 for what mistakes
    might have been made. After 9-11, what would your biggest
    mistake be, would you say, and what lessons have learned
    from it? BUSH: I wish you'd have given me this written
    question ahead of time so I could plan for it.

    John, I'm sure historians will look back and say, gosh, he
    could've done it better this way or that way. You know, I
    just -- I'm sure something will pop into my head here in
    the midst of this press conference, with all the pressure
    of trying to come up with answer, but it hadn't yet.

    The other Condi doesn't have that problem: threetwoone.orgrice
    babble.gif

    --
    tanx, Howard

    Q: Can we call it a quagmire yet?

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  10. Jeff Jones said:


    "h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    what is jeff a doctor of?


    chem (please, spare the jokes). It was actually a combined
    theoretical/physical degree on modelling coal combustion.
    Brown coal looks great in a miniskirt. I spent a lot of
    time reading Cyclingnews instead of doing experiments. I
    had no idea it how it would influence my career :-)

    yay for boring experiments! just being silly, but i hope you
    know what i mean.

    i remember when i was at school, i realized i would never
    make it past the undergraduate level when i was reading
    about some smartie and it said something like "along with
    pursuing a doctorate in theoretical and physical chemistry,
    jeff also is a competitive amateur cyclist, enjoys
    photography, and has recently written a detailed history of
    the cobbled climbs in belgium in his spare time..." (ok, i
    so made stuff up, but i'm sure it would have read something
    like that 🙂

    heather

  11. On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:13:25 GMT, Tim Mullin <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    John Everett <[email hidden]>
    wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Well of course! Great champions are not defined by their
    race results, like winning five TdFs in a row. It's their
    interview technique that truly defines them.

    Dude, there is a difference between winning a whole lot and
    being a great champion. It's a subjective thing, to be
    sure, and I believe an athlete's character is part of the
    equation. By your way of thinking Mike Tyson is in

    Comparing their respective records, personalities aside,
    it's clear Ali was a greater champion than Tyson. That's my
    way of thinking.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net
    home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  12. John Everett <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Comparing their respective records, personalities aside,
    it's clear Ali was a greater champion than Tyson. That's
    my way of thinking.

    Huh? Ali went 56-5, winning 91% of this fights. Tyson's
    record stands at 50-4, which is--if I figured this right--
    92%. That not very clear thinking at all. Hell, by your
    reasoning, Wladimir Klitschko, who has never a champion
    as a pro, but with a 42-3 record is better than both of
    them. WTF?

  13. Ewoud Dronkert said:

    He really is called Jeff Jones (aka Sonarrat). Maybe the
    original JJ should finally start calling himself Dr.
    Jones..?

    Nullarbor Jones and the Road to Hell?

  14. "Other Jeff Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Nah, I just thought it would be funny to do this. Since
    you don't agree, I'll change back after sending this
    message.


    I don't really mind - it's your name too after all! It'll
    create endless confusion in this newsgroup, if that's at all
    possible :-)

    As for work, I could certainly use another one of me around
    here sometimes so I can slope off down to the pub.

    Jeff
    p.s. in no way associated with the actor
    p.p.s. I could put "failed A. Mus." after my name

  15. Stewart Fleming said:
    Quoted message said:

    He really is called Jeff Jones (aka Sonarrat). Maybe the
    original JJ should finally start calling himself Dr.
    Jones..?

    Nullarbor Jones and the Road to Hell?

    Flandria Jones and the Riders of the Lard [censored]?

  16. "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Stewart Fleming said:
    Quoted message said:

    He really is called Jeff Jones (aka Sonarrat). Maybe
    the original JJ should finally start calling himself
    Dr. Jones..?

    Nullarbor Jones and the Road to Hell?

    Flandria Jones and the Riders of the Lard [censored]?

    Hehe. Friends used to quote Dr. Belloq at me during races.

  17. "Jeff Jones" <jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Other Jeff Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Nah, I just thought it would be funny to do this. Since
    you don't agree, I'll change back after sending this
    message.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't really mind - it's your name too after all! It'll
    create endless confusion in this newsgroup, if that's at
    all possible :-)

    Sonarrat is fine, even if it is a name from my fantasy life
    rather than from my human existence. (Benjo should know what
    I'm talking about.)

    Quoted message said:

    As for work, I could certainly use another one of me
    around here sometimes so I can slope off down to the pub.

    I have no problem with that. BTW, I also took four years of
    French and I still speak it fairly easily, though my
    vocabulary needs work.

    Quoted message said:

    Jeff
    p.s. in no way associated with the actor

    Studied acting in London, played King Leopold II in
    Amadeus, played Principal Rooney in Ferris, then was
    charged as a child molester tied to Paul Reubens. What a
    waste. There was also a rather obscure electronic composer
    with the same name...

    Quoted message said:

    p.p.s. I could put "failed A. Mus." after my name

    A. Mus? You mean community college?

    -Sonarrat.,

  18. "Jeff Jones" <jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:37:42 +1200, Stewart Fleming
    wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > He really is called Jeff Jones (aka Sonarrat). Maybe
    > the original JJ should finally start calling himself
    > Dr. Jones..?
    Nullarbor Jones and the Road to Hell?


    Flandria Jones and the Riders of the Lard [censored]?


    Hehe. Friends used to quote Dr. Belloq at me during races.

    Better than quoting Ferris Bueller's Day Off.

    -Sonarrat.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.