General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

wild camping

Started by paddy · · Last activity · 8 posts · 282 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
12 January 2006
Last activity
15 January 2006
Original author
paddy
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
282
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As a new menber I am sorry if this is a old chestnet of a thread, but I
    did a search and the topic seemed only to have 3 year old answers.

    With the new right to roam rules how do we stand as regards
    wild camping. There are some woodland trust areas near to me that I
    would like to over night in, with my 12 year old daughter.

    Is it still the same the same i.e. if you formally ask they say no as a
    matter of course
    if you get away with it no law broken?

    Thanks
    Paddy

  2. "paddy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As a new menber I am sorry if this is a old chestnet of a thread, but I
    did a search and the topic seemed only to have 3 year old answers.

    With the new right to roam rules how do we stand as regards
    wild camping. There are some woodland trust areas near to me that I
    would like to over night in, with my 12 year old daughter.

    Is it still the same the same i.e. if you formally ask they say no as a
    matter of course
    if you get away with it no law broken?

    Thanks
    Paddy


    The 'Countryside & Rights of Way' act has no bearing on camping whatsoever.
    It simply allows a right of access, on foot, to specific and limited areas
    on England and Wales ( about 7% of the total area, IIRC). The term 'right to
    roam' gives somewhat the wrong impression

  3. On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:29:46 -0000, "arthur dent" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    | The 'Countryside & Rights of Way' act has no bearing on camping whatsoever.
    | It simply allows a right of access, on foot, to specific and limited areas
    | on England and Wales ( about 7% of the total area, IIRC). The term 'right to
    | roam' gives somewhat the wrong impression

    Which is why the *official* name is Open Access Land, with Access strictly
    defined and limited by the act. Wild camping is *not* included in access.
    --
    Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk>
    17,000 free e-books at Project Gutenberg! http://www.gutenberg.net
    For Yorkshire Dialect go to www.hyphenologist.co.uk/songs/

  4. paddy said:

    Is it still the same the same i.e. if you formally ask they say no as a
    matter of course

    Yes.

    Quoted message said:

    if you get away with it no law broken?

    Of course no law's broken!
    --

    Paul Rooney

  5. On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:16:45 +0000, Dave Fawthrop burbled:

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:29:46 -0000, "arthur dent" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    | The 'Countryside & Rights of Way' act has no bearing on camping
    | whatsoever. It simply allows a right of access, on foot, to specific and
    | limited areas on England and Wales ( about 7% of the total area, IIRC).
    | The term 'right to roam' gives somewhat the wrong impression

    Which is why the *official* name is Open Access Land, with Access strictly
    defined and limited by the act. Wild camping is *not* included in
    access.

    In some places the "Open Access" land notice boards state that caravans,
    camping and bivouaccing are not allowed without permission. They don't
    mention that you probably can't get permission... :-(

    --
    Mick
    (no M$ software on here... :-) )
    Web: http://www.nascom.info
    Web: http://projectedsound.tk

  6. paddy said:

    As a new menber I am sorry if this is a old chestnet of a thread, but I
    did a search and the topic seemed only to have 3 year old answers.

    With the new right to roam rules how do we stand as regards
    wild camping. There are some woodland trust areas near to me that I
    would like to over night in, with my 12 year old daughter.

    Is it still the same the same i.e. if you formally ask they say no as a
    matter of course
    if you get away with it no law broken?

    I depends whether this is Scitland or England and Wales. Wildcamping
    is part of the code in Scotland.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  7. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:


    Is it still the same the same i.e. if you formally ask they say no as a
    matter of course
    if you get away with it no law broken?


    Arrive late; leave early; hope no one sees you.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  8. Thanks for all your input. I think I will just follow Frans advice
    Arrive late, Leave early

    Thanks again

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.