rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Wireless Cycle Computer

Started by leeman180 · · Last activity · 10 posts · 371 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
14 June 2005
Last activity
15 June 2005
Original author
leeman180
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
371
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. So I want to get a new cycle computer for my coker. I have an unused,
    still in the box, Cateye Velo 5, but now I am thinking I want a wireless
    cycle computer instead. The reason for this is because I think it would
    be better to have no wires at all. Wires are just something that will
    break or get snagged. Oh yeah, and its way cooler to have no wires in my
    opinion. I know the bike shop where I bought it and I'm 100% sure I will
    get a full refund, in fact they told me I would, if I decide to go
    wireless.

    So, should I get a wireless cycle computer? What are your experiences
    with them? and what can you recommend?

    I might just be overly paranoid and should stick with what I have.

    Thanks
    Lee

    --
    leeman180 - i should be out riding

    'My Gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/Lees-Uni-Stuff) - last
    updated 5/20/05
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    leeman180's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8441
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  2. I have a wireless computer for my Coker. It doesn't work.

    However, I do have a long custom handle on the front. When I used the
    computer wirelessly I had to mount it right next to the seat. Not out
    front where I wanted it to be easily viewable, but directly under the
    front handle on my KH seat. To have it another 4-6 inches away was too
    far and it didn't work then. I have the same computer now, but I
    purchased a wired base for it.

    So it really depends upon how/where you are going to mount the computer
    itself.

    --
    jl0r - Rider

    Training: http://www.aut.unitours.org
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    jl0r's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4497
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  3. The wire probably wouldn't get in your way if you wrap it around the
    seat post or something like that. I wouldn't get a wireless because its
    probably just a lot more money, when you really don't need one. I have
    no expirience with a Speedmeter on a uni, but with expirience having a
    Speedmeter on a bicycle I would recommend wires.

    --
    MERCYME - Easy Rider

    RIP Johnny Smyth 1/22/89-6/7/05

    "I don't believe in [censored], thats what I said"- Afroman

    "I wanna be as free as the spirits of the ones who left, I'm talking
    Malcom, Coltrane, and my man Yusef"-Common Sense

    AIM-Mr Mercy3

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MERCYME's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9764
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  4. I have a Cateye cordless on my Coker now, and have used it for a long
    time on my muni. I have the display mounted on the belt strap of my
    hydration waist pack so I can see it while riding. It works great, and
    I love not having wires.

    Drawbacks:

    The transmitter is really big and hard to mount. I don't know if newer
    ones are any smaller.

    The other day I stopped at a convenience store and as I was standing
    outside, I looked down and noticed the display was rapidly adding miles
    as I stood there! Something was emitting a frequency that freaked it
    out.

    As with everything, there are tradeoffs.

    --
    S_Wallis - MUni-motivated, Distance-curious

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn
    how to do it." Pablo Picasso
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    S_Wallis's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1520
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  5. Just get a Garmin wrist GPS unit. Nathan Hoover had one on the last
    ride I did with him and it was awesome. In addition to the normal
    Cyclocomputer functions, it also gave altitude, heart rate, maps out
    your route on computer and other cool stuff. I think his was about 200,
    but it might be worth it if you can swing the money.

    --
    daino149 - On Vacation - till i find a job

    OPPORTUNITYISNOWHERE
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    daino149's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/933
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  6. The GPS is definately way more than I need, and for $200, its way more
    than I want to spend. Im going to keep my cycle computer now. I was
    planning on mounting the computer on a handle in front of the seat so if
    a wireless one couldn't handle that I need to use the wires.
    Additionaly, it seems to me that computers with wires are more reliable
    (thats a really odd story S_Wallis). So I'm stickin with them wires for
    now.

    Thanks everyone.
    Lee

    --
    leeman180 - i should be out riding

    'My Gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/Lees-Uni-Stuff) - last
    updated 5/20/05
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    leeman180's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8441
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  7. For what it's worth, I've got a wireless computer (a Sigma 800) on my
    bike, and although it works fine and looks nice and tidy with no wires,
    I'm not sure I would bother with wireless again. The pickup/transmitter
    unit is much bigger than the pickup on a normal wired computer and has
    to be mounted further up the fork because of this (road bike fork is too
    skinny near the bottom - not really relevant to unicycles). But the
    worst pain in the [censored] is that there are three sets of batteries
    (transmitter, receiver, computer) so it's not easy to work out which one
    is flat when it konks out.

    --
    rob.northcott - Need to practise uphill mounts
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rob.northcott's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7436
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  8. leeman180 said:

    *... I was planning on mounting the computer on a handle in front of
    the seat so if a wireless one couldn't handle that I need to use the
    wires. Additionaly, it seems to me that computers with wires are more
    reliable (thats a really odd story S_Wallis). So I'm stickin with them
    wires for now...

    Lee *


    Wired is probably easier, cheaper, and more dependable, but to clarify
    a couple of things:

    The wireless should have no trouble at all mounted on the handle. Again,
    mine works great on my waist strap which is higher and a less direct
    line of sight. When you mount the transmitter you have to be sure the
    arrow is pointing to where the display will be, they are sensitive to
    that. Once mounted properly, they recieve dependably.

    I was standing against the wall of the store and may have been next to a
    security system, microwave, or something similar. That is a concern with
    wireless.

    I have been using mine for about a year and a half on the original
    batteries.

    --
    S_Wallis - MUni-motivated, Distance-curious

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn
    how to do it." Pablo Picasso
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    S_Wallis's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1520
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  9. I'm changing my question, as I've decided I will most likely get a
    Reeder handle, and now I just want to know if a cycle computer can be
    mounted on that one. anyone?

    --
    James_Potter - betcha can't stick it!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    James_Potter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3807
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

  10. James_Potter said:

    *I'm changing my question, as I've decided I will most likely get a
    Reeder handle, and now I just want to know if a cycle computer can be
    mounted on that one. anyone? *

    Why do you choose a Reeder handle for your coker over a GB4 handle? GB4
    handles are generally what all coker heads have and I think Reeders used
    for trials. I just think that GB4 handles look sweet.

    However if you do get the Reeder handle for your coker, couldn't you
    just mount it right on the handle part itself? If it's around 7/8" OD,
    (the standard 0D of bike handlebars I think, might want to check) then I
    think it will work just fine.

    --
    leeman180 - i should be out riding

    'My Gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/Lees-Uni-Stuff) - last
    updated 5/20/05
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    leeman180's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8441
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/41172

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.