Road Cycling · Public discussion

Wireless Cyclocomputers - Opinions

Started by Mike · · Last activity · 28 posts · 2,134 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
19 April 2004
Last activity
16 May 2004
Original author
Mike
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,134
Views / 30 days
12
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a Schwinn wireless and I love it. No unsightly wires
    to entangle or have to bunch up to take up the slack. Plus
    it measures distance traveled down to the metre. I hope this
    doesn't get top posted. If it does my apologies as that is
    how my system works.

    "Comcast Giganews" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:K_mdnXYY78aEIxjdRVn-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I had a cateye wireless and did not like it. It received
    interference


    from

    Quoted message said:

    electrical sources (traffic lights, power lines, etc) that
    caused it to go haywire.

    "Mike" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Thinking about buying one of these. Are there any
    drawbacks to it being wireless i.e. battery usage etc.?

    Thanks


  2. I have a wireless Vetta V100 w/ wireless cadence, and a wired Sigma something-or-other. I bought the wireless for a bike with S&S couplers- wireless is pretty mandatory for a bike that gets taken apart and put into a box.

    Overall, the vetta works ok and the no-wires look is cleaner (point for wireless), but the wired computer has less frustrating issues.

    I find that the wireless batteries (larger, more expensive and more numerous) last me about 6 months compared to 1-2 years for the wired computer. And the batteries always seem to die at inopportune times, such as during an event I had hoped to clock. (2 points for wired).

    When the batteries do go, it isn't always clear what is happening or why- the signal seems to fade in and out and interference starts to occur for a little while before the device stops receiving a signal entirely (in contrast, the wired display just slowly fades out over a period of weeks or months, and continues to record complete data throughout) (point for wired).

    When the wireless batteries start to go, I find myself wondering if the transmitters got out of alignment with the magnets at first, or why I suddenly seem to be getting more interference, before tinkering and realizing that the problem is the batteries. Even then, I end up replacing all 3 batteries (head unit, fork transmitter, cadence transmitter) before it fixes the problem.

    Having had this happen twice now, I hope that I will be quicker on the uptake next time, and just replace all 3 batteries immediately.

    I have not noticed wireless interference except when the batteries are about to die.

    Also, the wired computer updates instantly, while the wireless seems only to resend signals every 3-5 seconds. Not a huge deal, but a 1/2 point in the wired column.

    On the other hand, the wired cadence on my Sigma just gave up the ghost. The mount is made with slots to plug in the cadence wire, and I think the contact leads got screwed up somehow- I probably yanked on the wire inadvertently. A new cadence wire might fix it- I haven't tried to find one yet. (a point for wireless).

    I think this adds up to 3.5 points for wired and 2 for wireless.

    Finally, I couldn't get the cadence transmitter to work at all for the first few weeks after I installed it. Eventually I gave up tinkering and left it alone- after about 2 weeks it magically started to work, and has been pretty much fine ever since. A point the "weird" column.

    Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Mike
    Thinking about buying one of these. Are there any drawbacks
    to it being wireless i.e. battery usage etc.?

    Thanks

  3. "Comcast Giganews" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I had a cateye wireless and did not like it. It received
    interference


    from

    Quoted message said:

    electrical sources (traffic lights, power lines, etc) that
    caused it to go haywire.

    I've had a wireless Cateye on my bike for the past three to
    four years and it's been flawless. A great tool.

    fwiw

  4. GaryG said:

    "Mike" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Thinking about buying one of these. Are there any
    drawbacks to it being wireless i.e. battery usage etc.?

    Thanks

    The only drawback I've seen is that most wireless units do
    not "auto-start". You have to remember to push a button to
    start the computer functions when you start riding, or
    after you've stopped for more than 5 minutes or so.
    They're designed this way to conserve battery life on the
    transmitter battery. Because of this, I'll sometimes miss
    a few 10ths of a mile before I realize the computer is not
    running.

    Despite this issue, I really like wireless units. They're
    easier to mount, and you don't have those wires running
    all over your bike.

    Why can't you run the wire up the brake cable?

    --

    -TTFN

    -Steven

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    GaryG said:

    "Mike" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Thinking about buying one of these. Are there any
    drawbacks to it


    being

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    wireless i.e. battery usage etc.?

    Thanks

    The only drawback I've seen is that most wireless units
    do not


    "auto-start".

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You have to remember to push a button to start the
    computer functions


    when

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you start riding, or after you've stopped for more than
    5 minutes or so. They're designed this way to conserve
    battery life on the transmitter battery. Because of
    this, I'll sometimes miss a few 10ths of a mile


    before

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I realize the computer is not running.

    Despite this issue, I really like wireless units.
    They're easier to


    mount,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and you don't have those wires running all over
    your bike.

    Why can't you run the wire up the brake cable?

    When I had wired, that is where I ran the wire. But, it
    still has to go up the fork leg before it gets to the brake
    cable (and be secured with zip ties or tape on the fork).
    And, you still see the wire wound around the brake cable.
    Mostly it's an aesthetic issue...similar to the difference
    between running visible speaker wires around your living
    room, or running them behind the walls. I prefer the "clean"
    look of wireless.

    However, while riding in the Chico Wildflower Century
    yesterday (along with about 4,000 others), I did notice some
    apparent intermittent interference. On a couple of
    occasions, my speed jumped up a few mph for a couple of
    seconds, then returned to normal. This was the first time
    I've noticed this...but, I also changed both batteries the
    day before so I'm not entirely sure as to the cause.

    GG

    Quoted message said:


    --

    -TTFN

    -Steven

  6. GaryG said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    GaryG said:

    "Mike" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > Thinking about buying one of these. Are there any
    > drawbacks to it


    being

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > wireless i.e. battery usage etc.?
    >
    > Thanks
    >

    The only drawback I've seen is that most wireless
    units do not


    "auto-start".

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You have to remember to push a button to start the
    computer functions


    when

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you start riding, or after you've stopped for more
    than 5 minutes or so. They're designed this way to
    conserve battery life on the transmitter battery.
    Because of this, I'll sometimes miss a few 10ths of a
    mile


    before

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I realize the computer is not running.

    Despite this issue, I really like wireless units.
    They're easier to


    mount,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and you don't have those wires running all over your
    bike.

    Why can't you run the wire up the brake cable?

    When I had wired, that is where I ran the wire. But, it
    still has to go up the fork leg before it gets to the
    brake cable (and be secured with zip ties or tape on the
    fork). And, you still see the wire wound around the brake
    cable. Mostly it's an aesthetic issue...similar to the
    difference between running visible speaker wires around
    your living room, or running them behind the walls.

    Shrink tubing?

    Quoted message said:

    I prefer the "clean" look of wireless.

    Nothing wrong with that! <g>

    Quoted message said:

    However, while riding in the Chico Wildflower Century
    yesterday (along with about 4,000 others), I did notice
    some apparent intermittent interference. On a couple of
    occasions, my speed jumped up a few mph for a couple of
    seconds, then returned to normal. This was the first time
    I've noticed this...but, I also changed both batteries the
    day before so I'm not entirely sure as to the cause.

    --

    -TTFN

    -Steven

  7. I have about 20,000 km on my Cateye Astrale and have not
    needed to replace the battery. (i.e., 3 years of cycling)

    Badger_South <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    David Reuteler said:
    GaryG garyg@shasta_spambegone_software.com said:

    > Reasons not to get wireless:
    > 1. 2 batteries to wear out

    3,000 miles on my Vetta V100A. No need to replace
    either battery yet.

    the batteries in the shimano flight deck sensor wear out
    rather frequently which i define as several months of
    moderate usage. when i was touring i replaced the battery
    4 times in 4 months. two or three times a season was more
    like it for normal, tho. not a big deal, but ..

    otoh, now i use the campag ergobrain. haven't changed a
    battery yet. off- topic, i found the flight deck menus
    more intuitive -- i've never been a fan of the cat-eye
    style computers.

    The ergobrain looks nice and seems to have some unique
    features like stopwatch which can be run independently.

    Do any of these allow downloading into the PC or is that a
    huge price jump?

    -B

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (J. MacMillan) said:

    I have about 20,000 km on my Cateye Astrale and have not
    needed to replace the battery. (i.e., 3 years of cycling)

    Badger_South <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    David Reuteler said:

    GaryG <garyg@shasta_spambegone_software.com> wrote:
    >> Reasons not to get wireless:
    >> 1. 2 batteries to wear out
    >
    > 3,000 miles on my Vetta V100A. No need to replace
    > either battery yet.

    the batteries in the shimano flight deck sensor wear
    out rather frequently which i define as several months
    of moderate usage. when i was touring i replaced the
    battery 4 times in 4 months. two or three times a
    season was more like it for normal, tho. not a big
    deal, but ..

    Oh, somehow I missed this thread.

    I haven't tried any of these Filzer computers yet, but hey,
    they're too cheap not to try:

    mec.caproduct detail.jsp
    older_id=66919
    5&PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=748239&bmUID=1084672983291

    tinyurl.com39b8u

    C$24 for a function-laden wireless computer. C$14.50 for the
    wired version. I intend to grab one of these next time I'm
    in MEC and have cash on hand.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden]
    sfu.cawiredcola President, Fabrizio
    Mazzoleni Fan Club

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.