Words fail me

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

I like the seatbelt. It's especially out of place on such a wheelie-
prone beast.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

It won't really hurt until you go down a steep hill.

--
I don't read Google's spam. Reply with another service.

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Tim Curry approved pelvis thrust locomotion?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Kevin McMurtrie said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

It won't really hurt until you go down a steep hill.

Uphill might be even more interesting.

...an excellent example of poor market research...it should been built
as a tandem...

Best Regards & Thanks for Sharing 🙂

Mike Baldwin

This azxppears to be a fixie, which means that the rider must continue to
move his/her butt vertically even when trying to rest.

landotter said:

Carl Fogel said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Tim Curry approved pelvis thrust locomotion?

It really drives you insay-ay-ay-ay-ane!

I gotta observe that Carl seems to be doing some sort of time warp
marathon.

Chalo

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

There was a bike called dik-dik which did the same (pointless) thing
more elegantly with eccentric wheels under a hopping rider.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:40:44 -0700, [email hidden] may have

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

An 1894 HulaBike for Baptists? No danger of looking like you're
dancing, since the rider is still seated...until the thing topples
backwards due to the foolish design.

--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:16:04 -0600, A Muzi <[email hidden]> may

have said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

There was a bike called dik-dik which did the same (pointless) thing
more elegantly with eccentric wheels under a hopping rider.

Reinvented as the HulaBike! http://www.bikeforest.com/hulabike.php

--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Quoted message said:

A Muzi <[email hidden]> blathered:

Quoted message said:

There was a bike called dik-dik which did the same (pointless) thing
more elegantly with eccentric wheels under a hopping rider.

Werehatrack said:

Reinvented as the HulaBike! http://www.bikeforest.com/hulabike.php

Thanks. I didn't know it by that name and couldn't find a photo.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Werehatrack said:

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:40:44 -0700, [email hidden] may have

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

An 1894 HulaBike for Baptists? No danger of looking like you're
dancing, since the rider is still seated...until the thing topples
backwards due to the foolish design.

PLEASE let's not have a "Huckabike"!

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

A more sophisticated version:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=sxR2AAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=642758

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=cH1eAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=514572

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

A more sophisticated version:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=sxR2AAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=642758

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

An English version:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=1tRkAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA43&dq=587318

Cheers,

Carl Fogel