Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Yet another broken crank thread

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 8 posts · 809 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
12 April 2005
Last activity
13 April 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
809
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/90784314@N00/9040858/
    I weigh less 72 kilos and have had these cranks for under one year.

  2. Quoted message said:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/90784314@N00/9040858/
    I weigh less 72 kilos and have had these cranks for under one year.

    Ride standing up much?

    From the look of it, the break started at the points of the ridges and
    migrated, which is not surprising. Is there a chance that at the
    location of the break there was a nick or heavy scratch on the ridges?
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  3. Is it just my imagination, or are the majority of these broken crank
    threads about Ritchey cranks?

  4. Quoted message said:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/90784314@N00/9040858/
    I weigh less 72 kilos and have had these cranks for under one year.

    Looks like that one's been on its way for awhile now.

    Hope you're okay.

    Got it everyone, wash and inspect once a week. (actually I'm just saying that to
    remind myself)

    Ron

  5. mugwump said:

    Is it just my imagination, or are the majority of these broken crank
    threads about Ritchey cranks?

    quite possibly. ever wonder why campy & shimano have abandoned this
    "i-beam" style of arm? answer: the sharp edges are points of maximum
    stress. this increases notch vulnerability. any slight inherent or
    aquired flaw is a fatigue nucleator in the maximum stress zone - not a
    good combination.

  6. On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:27:05 -0700, jim beam <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    mugwump said:

    Is it just my imagination, or are the majority of these broken crank
    threads about Ritchey cranks?

    quite possibly. ever wonder why campy & shimano have abandoned this
    "i-beam" style of arm? answer: the sharp edges are points of maximum
    stress. this increases notch vulnerability. any slight inherent or
    aquired flaw is a fatigue nucleator in the maximum stress zone - not a
    good combination.

    It seems inherently stupid (to me, at least) to be using a relatively
    thin-walled *open* section for a member that's loaded in both bending
    and torsion.

    [email hidden]

  7. Yes. I do a lot of climbing standing. 🙂

    re: nick or scratch - I don't see one but it may just be hard to see
    after the fact.

    There is a crack in the same arm near this break in the next two
    pictures. None visible on the right arm as far as I can tell.

  8. Quoted message said:

    Yes. I do a lot of climbing standing. 🙂

    re: nick or scratch - I don't see one but it may just be hard to see
    after the fact.

    There is a crack in the same arm near this break in the next two
    pictures. None visible on the right arm as far as I can tell.

    Sounds like maybe you need stronger cranks, then, and perhaps it's
    wise to start watching for cracks no matter what kind you get.

    OTOH, if you contact Ritchey's company, they might replace the failed
    units. It's worth a phone call in my estimation.

    I don't know what Tom Ritchey (and his company) may have in the way of
    engineering and materials expertise in-house, but I will note that in
    the field of auto racing, parts from suppliers that are of the "racer
    turned maker" variety tend to have a much higher failure rate than
    those from car makers. OTOH, the Ritchey stuff that I've had (and
    still have, for that matter) has been good enough for what *I* do,
    which isn't all that strenuous. (No cranks, though.)
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.