You're being trolled

In message <[email hidden]>, DFF
<DFF@DFF.?.invalid> writes

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:11:17 +0100, "JK." <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

However, it would appear Rooney is thought of as a 'decent' chap
on uk.rec.walking.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Some of us have decided that perhaps more of his true nature on
Usenet as experienced on demon.local should be made known to them.
By the bit bucketful.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Call it a public service.

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Quoted message said:

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

That's a laugh Rooney after what you've been attempting to do to
demon.local for a period of two years.

You're trying to treat these good people just as you did the
denizens of demon.local. You are totally warped.

Quoted message said:

Use this information as you see fit.

You will now see what Paul Rooney and his 'friends' are capable
of.

The poster above has not even the decency to use a valid email address.
This form of address has been used in demon.local recently, we assume
by Paul Rooney and others in yet more attempts at 'disruption'.

--
JK.

In message <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Rooney forgot to post the full message in an attempt to make
you think you are being 'trolled'.

You are not. Here is the full message. You may if you wish check
it out on demon.local.

In message <[email hidden]>, Malcolm
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

BTW, it beggars belief that you don't even begin to realise how using
"Paul {Hamilton Rooney}" as your sig causes deep offence to everyone
who knew, or had internet contact with, Brian, not to mention his
widow. It is the action of a moronic [censored]. But then, that's what
you are.

We all concur on this one Malcolm.

He's scum Scouse and doesn't know the boundaries between his
warped sense of humour and common decency.

However, it would appear Rooney is thought of as a 'decent' chap
on uk.rec.walking.

Some of us have decided that perhaps more of his true nature on
Usenet as experienced on demon.local should be made known to them.
By the bit bucketful.

Call it a public service.

--
JK.

--
JK.

DFF@DFF said...

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Use this information as you see fit.

I've already KF'd them.
--
To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
where common sense dictates.

In message <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

DFF@DFF said...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Use this information as you see fit.

Quoted message said:

I've already KF'd them.

You've taken notice of a post by an 'anonymous' poster, who is
more than likely to be Rooney himself (who else?) against the evidence
you have been offered from a legitimate source.

Nice one Fran.

Ever heard the expression '[censored] for brains?

--
JK.

DFF DFF@DFF said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Use this information as you see fit.

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill, who has also migrated here
recently. They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect. I've had the pleasure
of meeting up with several of the old dl posters over the years
(though they don't realise it (-: ) and they are quite sociable
really. And not a top-poster among them!
--

Paul Rooney

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

DFF DFF@DFF said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Use this information as you see fit.

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill,

I'm intrigued...

If you really believe I am a "decent chap" then why have you felt the
need to follow up practically every posting I make on demon.local with
nasty, snide comments? Is that how you behave towards somebody you
consider to be a "decent chap".

I'm intrigued as to what it is, precisely, that myself and others in
that group have done to you to make you behave in such a manner. Your
following-up to practically *every* post, breaking the one rule of the
group every time (that sigs should be less than 4 lines), your revelling
in the fact that demon.local has practically been flooded to death, your
encouraging of others in that flooding activity, your homophobic
insinuations towards myself, your frankly disgusting behaviour towards
Janie after BHK's death... I could go on.

What the hell is it that we have done to you to warrant such behaviour?

Quoted message said:

who has also migrated here
recently.

I have been here some time, FWIW.

Quoted message said:

They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect. I've had the pleasure
of meeting up with several of the old dl posters over the years
(though they don't realise it (-: )

I very much doubt that you have.

Quoted message said:

and they are quite sociable
really. And not a top-poster among them!

Yes we are sociable. You probably will have noticed that we have regular
meets and most of us know each other in real life. And, yes, there is a
difference (sometimes huge) between real-life and newsgroup personas.
And it is for that reason that I made the offer (perfectly genuine, I
assure you) to come out walking next time you're up this way. Maybe the
question I posed above can be sorted out amicably over a bar of Kendal
Mint Cake on the top of Kinder Scout. Or you can carry on as you are...

Up to you, really.
--
Chris Hill

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:24:58 +0000, DFF <DFF@DFF> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Use this information as you see fit.

Quoted message said:

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill, who has also migrated here
recently.

What a creep.

See my and others evidence being presented to your ng and then judge
this pathetic individual called Paul Rooney.

Quite frankly the guy is seriously unhinged.

Quoted message said:

They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect.

You pompous imbecilic prat.

Quoted message said:

I've had the pleasure
of meeting up with several of the old dl posters over the years
(though they don't realise it (-: ) and they are quite sociable
really.

A liar to boot. Rooney you seriously need professional help.

Quoted message said:

And not a top-poster among them!

How ingratiating, considering most of us have been on Usenet
for at least 10 years.

--
JK.

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

DFF DFF@DFF said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Use this information as you see fit.

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill, who has also migrated here
recently. They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect.

Are you claiming that what is being said about your offensive sig ref
BHK is incorrect? Are you claiming that you have not deliberately set
out to trash a newsgroup?

--
Craig Oldfield

Chris Hill said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

DFF DFF@DFF said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Use this information as you see fit.

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill,

I'm intrigued...

Everyone finds me intriguing!

Quoted message said:

If you really believe I am a "decent chap" then why have you felt the
need to follow up practically every posting I make on demon.local with
nasty, snide comments? Is that how you behave towards somebody you
consider to be a "decent chap".

I've kicked numerous decent chaps. Being a decent chap doesn't give
you immunity. But I don't do cross-group post-mortems. Take it up in
the appropriate ng.

Quoted message said:

I'm intrigued as to what it is, precisely, that myself and others in
that group have done to you to make you behave in such a manner. Your
following-up to practically *every* post, breaking the one rule of the
group every time (that sigs should be less than 4 lines), your revelling
in the fact that demon.local has practically been flooded to death, your
encouraging of others in that flooding activity, your homophobic
insinuations towards myself, your frankly disgusting behaviour towards
Janie after BHK's death... I could go on.

See above...

Quoted message said:

What the hell is it that we have done to you to warrant such behaviour?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

who has also migrated here
recently.

I have been here some time, FWIW.

Quoted message said:

They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect. I've had the pleasure
of meeting up with several of the old dl posters over the years
(though they don't realise it (-: )

I very much doubt that you have.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - read more F. Forsyth and
less A. McNab.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

and they are quite sociable
really. And not a top-poster among them!

Yes we are sociable. You probably will have noticed that we have regular
meets and most of us know each other in real life. And, yes, there is a
difference (sometimes huge) between real-life and newsgroup personas.
And it is for that reason that I made the offer (perfectly genuine, I
assure you) to come out walking next time you're up this way. Maybe the
question I posed above can be sorted out amicably over a bar of Kendal
Mint Cake on the top of Kinder Scout. Or you can carry on as you are...

Up to you, really.

I'm not really looking for any new friends atm, Chris. But I'll bear
your suggestion in mind. It wouldn't be before mid-January though.
And I'd have to insist that it was done over a smoke and a whisky.
Kendal Mint Cake is bad for your health.
And I *certainly* wouldn't want to spoil a walk by discussing Usenet.
Life's too short for such absurdities. My interests are women, drink,
wildlife, women, food, foreign travel, women, languages, women and
drink.

--

Paul Rooney

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Chris Hill said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:24:58 +0000, DFF <DFF@DFF> wrote:

>As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
>being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
>Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.
>
>Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.
>
>Use this information as you see fit.

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill,

I'm intrigued...

Everyone finds me intriguing!

Quoted message said:

If you really believe I am a "decent chap" then why have you felt the
need to follow up practically every posting I make on demon.local with
nasty, snide comments? Is that how you behave towards somebody you
consider to be a "decent chap".

I've kicked numerous decent chaps. Being a decent chap doesn't give
you immunity.

So... I believe you're saying that you'll hound or harass someone for no
apparent reason, irrespective of whether they've actually done anything
to harm you?

Feel free to correct me if my interpretation is wrong.

Quoted message said:

But I don't do cross-group post-mortems. Take it up in
the appropriate ng.

While you continue to post in manner which breaks the single rule of
that group, I will discuss nothing with you in that group, as you well
know.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'm intrigued as to what it is, precisely, that myself and others in
that group have done to you to make you behave in such a manner. Your
following-up to practically *every* post, breaking the one rule of the
group every time (that sigs should be less than 4 lines), your revelling
in the fact that demon.local has practically been flooded to death, your
encouraging of others in that flooding activity, your homophobic
insinuations towards myself, your frankly disgusting behaviour towards
Janie after BHK's death... I could go on.

See above...

Jesus. You really are beyond the pale. You poke fun at someone's
bereavement for what? Your own amusement? No reason at all?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What the hell is it that we have done to you to warrant such behaviour?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

who has also migrated here
recently.

I have been here some time, FWIW.

Quoted message said:

They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect. I've had the pleasure
of meeting up with several of the old dl posters over the years
(though they don't realise it (-: )

I very much doubt that you have.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - read more F. Forsyth and
less A. McNab.

I think you might be entertaining some fantasies there... And since you
bring it up, I haven't read anything by McNabb in at least four years.
Why bring him up?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

and they are quite sociable
really. And not a top-poster among them!

Yes we are sociable. You probably will have noticed that we have regular
meets and most of us know each other in real life. And, yes, there is a
difference (sometimes huge) between real-life and newsgroup personas.
And it is for that reason that I made the offer (perfectly genuine, I
assure you) to come out walking next time you're up this way. Maybe the
question I posed above can be sorted out amicably over a bar of Kendal
Mint Cake on the top of Kinder Scout. Or you can carry on as you are...

Up to you, really.

I'm not really looking for any new friends atm, Chris. But I'll bear
your suggestion in mind.

It has nothing to do with "friends". From what I've seen of you, you are
the last person I would want as a friend. I am, however, intrigued, as
I've said. It's my experience that walkers are usually decent people and
I was hoping that maybe you were and your behaviour was due to some
gross misunderstanding that had got out of hand but could be sorted out
in a civilised manner. Now I'm wondering if I was wrong.

Quoted message said:

It wouldn't be before mid-January though.
And I'd have to insist that it was done over a smoke and a whisky.
Kendal Mint Cake is bad for your health.

Fine. I'm easy to contact. Please feel free.

--
Chris Hill

In message <MPG.1e1f9fe3ae59a0a7989a96@localhost>, Craig Oldfield
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:24:58 +0000, DFF <DFF@DFF> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Use this information as you see fit.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill, who has also migrated here
recently. They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect.

Quoted message said:

Are you claiming that what is being said about your offensive sig ref
BHK is incorrect? Are you claiming that you have not deliberately set
out to trash a newsgroup?

Well as I've already posted irrefutable evidence here, I doubt
you'll get much of a reply to those questions without them being
obvious lies.

--
JK.

Chris Hill said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Chris Hill said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes
>On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:24:58 +0000, DFF <DFF@DFF> wrote:
>
>
>>As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
>>being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
>>Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.
>>
>>Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.
>>
>>Use this information as you see fit.
>
>Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill,

I'm intrigued...

Everyone finds me intriguing!

Quoted message said:

If you really believe I am a "decent chap" then why have you felt the
need to follow up practically every posting I make on demon.local with
nasty, snide comments? Is that how you behave towards somebody you
consider to be a "decent chap".

I've kicked numerous decent chaps. Being a decent chap doesn't give
you immunity.

So... I believe you're saying that you'll hound or harass someone for no
apparent reason, irrespective of whether they've actually done anything
to harm you?

Feel free to correct me if my interpretation is wrong.

Quoted message said:

But I don't do cross-group post-mortems. Take it up in
the appropriate ng.

While you continue to post in manner which breaks the single rule of
that group, I will discuss nothing with you in that group, as you well
know.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'm intrigued as to what it is, precisely, that myself and others in
that group have done to you to make you behave in such a manner. Your
following-up to practically *every* post, breaking the one rule of the
group every time (that sigs should be less than 4 lines), your revelling
in the fact that demon.local has practically been flooded to death, your
encouraging of others in that flooding activity, your homophobic
insinuations towards myself, your frankly disgusting behaviour towards
Janie after BHK's death... I could go on.

See above...

Jesus. You really are beyond the pale. You poke fun at someone's
bereavement for what? Your own amusement? No reason at all?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What the hell is it that we have done to you to warrant such behaviour?

Quoted message said:

>who has also migrated here
>recently.

I have been here some time, FWIW.

>They - like Gus - are entiltled to their opinions, even
>when misguided, misled, or just plain incorrect. I've had the pleasure
>of meeting up with several of the old dl posters over the years
>(though they don't realise it (-: )

I very much doubt that you have.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - read more F. Forsyth and
less A. McNab.

I think you might be entertaining some fantasies there... And since you
bring it up, I haven't read anything by McNabb in at least four years.
Why bring him up?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>and they are quite sociable
>really. And not a top-poster among them!

Yes we are sociable. You probably will have noticed that we have regular
meets and most of us know each other in real life. And, yes, there is a
difference (sometimes huge) between real-life and newsgroup personas.
And it is for that reason that I made the offer (perfectly genuine, I
assure you) to come out walking next time you're up this way. Maybe the
question I posed above can be sorted out amicably over a bar of Kendal
Mint Cake on the top of Kinder Scout. Or you can carry on as you are...

Up to you, really.

I'm not really looking for any new friends atm, Chris. But I'll bear
your suggestion in mind.

It has nothing to do with "friends". From what I've seen of you, you are
the last person I would want as a friend. I am, however, intrigued, as
I've said. It's my experience that walkers are usually decent people and
I was hoping that maybe you were and your behaviour was due to some
gross misunderstanding that had got out of hand but could be sorted out
in a civilised manner. Now I'm wondering if I was wrong.

Quoted message said:

It wouldn't be before mid-January though.
And I'd have to insist that it was done over a smoke and a whisky.
Kendal Mint Cake is bad for your health.

Fine. I'm easy to contact. Please feel free.

Chris, I don't think it's appropriate to discuss the internals of one
newsgroup in a different newsgroup. I expect you feel the same, at
heart. So you may as well drop all that guff. (Look what happened to
Malcolm when he brought dl's stuff into the bird group: he got
exposed!)

Now, to get to the point(s):

Walkers are no different from any other class of people - they're made
up of the good, the bad and the ugly. Same goes for landowners,
licensees and women. Don't expect them to be decent. If that's your
experience then your experience needs to be broadened.

As I said - we can certainly do Kinder. But would you feel
comfortable? Would you feel safe? Would you feel safe with me on Crib
Goch? Have you walked over Crib Goch?

If you're serious, drop me an email. To minimise emissions, I'll pick
you up at home - I draw the line at going in a Polo (-:
And it's on my route, anyway.

You must also realise that I adopt a holistic approach to these
things. The walk itself is an incomplete experience. You'll need to
imbibe as well, and preferably to inhale too.
--

Paul Rooney

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:34:26 +0000, Chris Hill
<[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Malcolm is a decent chap, as is Chris Hill,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'm intrigued...

Quoted message said:

Everyone finds me intriguing!

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If you really believe I am a "decent chap" then why have you felt the
need to follow up practically every posting I make on demon.local with
nasty, snide comments? Is that how you behave towards somebody you
consider to be a "decent chap".

Quoted message said:

I've kicked numerous decent chaps. Being a decent chap doesn't give
you immunity. But I don't do cross-group post-mortems. Take it up in
the appropriate ng.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'm intrigued as to what it is, precisely, that myself and others in
that group have done to you to make you behave in such a manner. Your
following-up to practically *every* post, breaking the one rule of the
group every time (that sigs should be less than 4 lines), your revelling
in the fact that demon.local has practically been flooded to death, your
encouraging of others in that flooding activity, your homophobic
insinuations towards myself, your frankly disgusting behaviour towards
Janie after BHK's death... I could go on.

Quoted message said:

See above...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What the hell is it that we have done to you to warrant such behaviour?

Rooney, cut the [censored] and just try and deny the above accusations.

You can't of course, as we can provide *hundreds* of examples
of your warped and twisted postings over a two year span.

If I'd have been Chris Hill I'd have had your ass in Court.

I'm surprised the decent people in here can even consider tolerating
such a reprehensible character.

Keep up the bluffing and blustering though, it warms my heart
to see you wriggling and squirming like this after what you've tried
but failed to accomplish in various ng's with your moronic sidekicks.

--
JK.

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Chris, I don't think it's appropriate to discuss the internals of one
newsgroup in a different newsgroup.

Well, there's a sudden change of heart.

Quoted message said:

I expect you feel the same, at
heart. So you may as well drop all that guff. (Look what happened to
Malcolm when he brought dl's stuff into the bird group: he got
exposed!)

Now, to get to the point(s):

Walkers are no different from any other class of people - they're made
up of the good, the bad and the ugly. Same goes for landowners,
licensees and women. Don't expect them to be decent. If that's your
experience then your experience needs to be broadened.

As I said - we can certainly do Kinder. But would you feel
comfortable?

Of course - otherwise I wouldn't have made the suggestion.

Quoted message said:

Would you feel safe?

Why shouldn't I?

Quoted message said:

Would you feel safe with me on Crib
Goch?

Why shouldn't I?

Quoted message said:

Have you walked over Crib Goch?

No. Relevance?

Quoted message said:

If you're serious, drop me an email.

I've already told you I'm serious. Mid-January is fine by me. Why not
just set a date now?

Quoted message said:

To minimise emissions, I'll pick
you up at home -

I don't think so. There's no way I'd give you my home address.

Quoted message said:

I draw the line at going in a Polo (-:

Your choice.

Quoted message said:

And it's on my route, anyway.

I'm sure it is.

Quoted message said:

You must also realise that I adopt a holistic approach to these
things. The walk itself is an incomplete experience. You'll need to
imbibe as well, and preferably to inhale too.

I'll do as I see fit, thanks.
--
Chris Hill

In message <[email hidden]>, at 23:24:58 on
Thu, 29 Dec 2005, DFF <DFF@DFF.?.invalid> wibbled

Quoted message said:

JK. said:

However, it would appear Rooney is thought of as a 'decent' chap
on uk.rec.walking.

Some of us have decided that perhaps more of his true nature on
Usenet as experienced on demon.local should be made known to them.
By the bit bucketful.

Call it a public service.

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

And they are their real names/initials.

Some here in urw will still remember me posting on occasion.

Quoted message said:

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

No. I would be the first to argue against making a group unusable.

A groups.google.co.uk for posts by Paul Rooney in the group
demon.local for the last few months will be instructive to
indicate he wants demon.local to be unusable - a newsgroup that
has been around Usenet for far longer than Paul Rooney.

You are perceived as a 'good chap' in urw. They do not know you have
more than once insulted the partner of Brian Hamilton Kelly after his
recent death and BHK was well known and widely respected on Usenet, by
a poor mimic of his real name plus casting aspersions.

urw probably doesn't know either that you had to remove the OS maps from
your website as you had breached the terms and conditions on the use
from the get-a-map service the OS provides.

--
Pedt

Chris Hill said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Chris, I don't think it's appropriate to discuss the internals of one
newsgroup in a different newsgroup.

Well, there's a sudden change of heart.

Quoted message said:

I expect you feel the same, at
heart. So you may as well drop all that guff. (Look what happened to
Malcolm when he brought dl's stuff into the bird group: he got
exposed!)

Now, to get to the point(s):

Walkers are no different from any other class of people - they're made
up of the good, the bad and the ugly. Same goes for landowners,
licensees and women. Don't expect them to be decent. If that's your
experience then your experience needs to be broadened.

As I said - we can certainly do Kinder. But would you feel
comfortable?

Of course - otherwise I wouldn't have made the suggestion.

Perhaps because you didn't really expect me to take it up?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Would you feel safe?

Why shouldn't I?

Oh, one of any number of reasons. You have to take care when you
arrange to meet strangers off the internet!

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Would you feel safe with me on Crib
Goch?

Why shouldn't I?

It's exposed.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Have you walked over Crib Goch?

No. Relevance?

See above.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If you're serious, drop me an email.

I've already told you I'm serious. Mid-January is fine by me. Why not
just set a date now?

Feel free - I'd prefer a range of dates initially, if that's OK by
you.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

To minimise emissions, I'll pick
you up at home -

I don't think so. There's no way I'd give you my home address.

You'll need to - or how will I be able to pick you up? I suppose I
could pick you up from a different address - but why? It sounds as
though you're a little suspicious...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I draw the line at going in a Polo (-:

Your choice.

Good. I choose my car. More space, better in the rough, etc..

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

And it's on my route, anyway.

I'm sure it is.

It is.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You must also realise that I adopt a holistic approach to these
things. The walk itself is an incomplete experience. You'll need to
imbibe as well, and preferably to inhale too.

I'll do as I see fit, thanks.

Not if you desire my company you won't. You'll behave yourself and
comport yourself correctly. And that includes committing yourself to a
pissup. I don't walk with teetotallers. They are bores.

--

Paul Rooney

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Chris, I don't think it's appropriate to discuss the internals of one
newsgroup in a different newsgroup.

Really?

Then kindly explain why you spammed demon.local across large parts of
usenet with your moronic destructive friends.

Quoted message said:

I expect you feel the same, at
heart.

No he doesn't.

Quoted message said:

So you may as well drop all that guff. (Look what happened to
Malcolm when he brought dl's stuff into the bird group: he got
exposed!)

Ooops, desperate Red Herring move here.

Quoted message said:

Now, to get to the point(s):

Quoted message said:

Walkers are no different from any other class of people - they're made
up of the good, the bad and the ugly. Same goes for landowners,
licensees and women. Don't expect them to be decent. If that's your
experience then your experience needs to be broadened.

I think your worldly experience will pale slightly against that
of Chris.

Quoted message said:

As I said - we can certainly do Kinder. But would you feel
comfortable? Would you feel safe? Would you feel safe with me on Crib
Goch? Have you walked over Crib Goch?

Sinister overtones here.

Actually the reverse would be nearer the truth.

Quoted message said:

If you're serious, drop me an email.

Oh no!

We all want to see the kiss and make up scenario.

I know Rooney. We'll have a Grand Walk. You and the regulars
of d.l and every other ng you've abused.

Quoted message said:

To minimise emissions, I'll pick
you up at home - I draw the line at going in a Polo (-:
And it's on my route, anyway.

LOL! You've gotta hand it to the guy.

Quoted message said:

You must also realise that I adopt a holistic approach to these
things. The walk itself is an incomplete experience. You'll need to
imbibe as well, and preferably to inhale too.

I believe you'd have great difficulty in inhaling at all after
my offer of a Grand Walk.

Scouse scum.

--
JK.

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

DFF@DFF said...

Quoted message said:

As you can see from the above which was posted to demon.local, you're
being trolled by some people who post under the names JK, Malcolm,
Neil Barker & Craig Oldfield.

Their aim is to render this newsgroup unusable.

Use this information as you see fit.

I've already KF'd them.

We tried that with Rooney, but he kept morphing 🙁

--
Do unto others....
mark horsman

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

Chris, I don't think it's appropriate to discuss the internals of one
newsgroup in a different newsgroup.

We're not discussing "internals we're discussing your disgraceful
attitude towards somebody recently bereaved, we're discussing your
attempted disruption of a newsgroup. Consider it a service to those here
who may be unaware of the *real* Paul Rooney.

Quoted message said:

As I said - we can certainly do Kinder. But would you feel
comfortable? Would you feel safe? Would you feel safe with me on Crib
Goch? Have you walked over Crib Goch?

Ooh, looks like hardman Rooney is issuing a threat here.
--
Craig Oldfield