A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
Anyone feel like showing the math again?
Thanks!
Joseph
As the curmudgeon, gotta remind you that these 'pure' numbers come from a wind tunnel. Other tough to predict and control factors like the weather and rider's performance, is at least as important. But tough to use to sell wheels.
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
Anyone feel like showing the math again?
Thanks!
Joseph
As the curmudgeon, gotta remind you that these 'pure' numbers come from a wind tunnel. Other tough to predict and control factors like the weather and rider's performance, is at least as important. But tough to use to sell wheels.
I know. My Deep V's are good enough for me. I'm of the opinion that for my purposes, even if it would help, it doen't matter because there are as you say so many other variables that have a greater effect that any benefit would probably be lost in the noise.
But this is for a buddy who really wants some, can afford them, but needs some sort of technical info to convince himself that he isn't just indulging a whim. (Even if he is!) I told him I once calculated that 40kmh with 404's was equalt to 37kmh with standard 32 rims. He wants to see the math, but I only plugged in values to equations some of the math guys here supplied.
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
Anyone feel like showing the math again?
Thanks!
Joseph
As the curmudgeon, gotta remind you that these 'pure' numbers come from a wind tunnel. Other tough to predict and control factors like the weather and rider's performance, is at least as important. But tough to use to sell wheels.
I know. My Deep V's are good enough for me. I'm of the opinion that for my purposes, even if it would help, it doen't matter because there are as you say so many other variables that have a greater effect that any benefit would probably be lost in the noise.
But this is for a buddy who really wants some, can afford them, but needs some sort of technical info to convince himself that he isn't just indulging a whim. (Even if he is!) I told him I once calculated that 40kmh with 404's was equalt to 37kmh with standard 32 rims. He wants to see the math, but I only plugged in values to equations some of the math guys here supplied.
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
What would I do without you guys? Why couldn't I find that thread?
Thanks!
Joseph
Dear Joseph,
I just searched the Google Group RBT archive for zipp, 404, drag, and 37 (the 37 kmh speed that you mentioned later in the thread that you had calculated):
On 23 Jan 2007 03:38:22 -0800, [email hidden] wrote:
>Hi All, > >A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info >on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp >404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance >numbers. > >I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged. > >Anyone feel like showing the math again? > >Thanks! > >Joseph
What would I do without you guys? Why couldn't I find that thread?
Thanks!
Joseph
Dear Joseph,
I just searched the Google Group RBT archive for zipp, 404, drag, and 37 (the 37 kmh speed that you mentioned later in the thread that you had calculated):
[email hidden] wrote: > On 23 Jan 2007 03:38:22 -0800, [email hidden] wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info > >on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp > >404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance > >numbers. > > > >I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged. > > > >Anyone feel like showing the math again? > > > >Thanks! > > > >Joseph > > Dear Joseph, > > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/32856bab0c850d6e/0cc54a90ba52e386?lnk=gst&q=404+zipp+drag+37&rnum=1#0cc54a90ba52e386 > > Cheers, > > Carl Fogel
What would I do without you guys? Why couldn't I find that thread?
Thanks!
Joseph
Dear Joseph,
I just searched the Google Group RBT archive for zipp, 404, drag, and 37 (the 37 kmh speed that you mentioned later in the thread that you had calculated):
On 23 Jan 2007 11:20:14 -0800, [email hidden] wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>[email hidden] wrote: >> On 23 Jan 2007 03:38:22 -0800, [email hidden] wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> >Hi All,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> >A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info >> >on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp >> >404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance >> >numbers.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> >I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
>What would I do without you guys? Why couldn't I find that thread?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>Thanks!
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>Joseph
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Dear Joseph,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I just searched the Google Group RBT archive for zipp, 404, drag, and 37 (the 37 kmh speed that you mentioned later in the thread that you had calculated):
A few years ago some of you guys were kind enough to supply some info on how to mathematically estimate the power savings possible with Zipp 404 wheels over normal wheels based on their published resistance numbers.
I cannot locate this thread, as it seems to have been expunged.
Anyone feel like showing the math again?
Thanks!
Joseph
As the curmudgeon, gotta remind you that these 'pure' numbers come from a wind tunnel. Other tough to predict and control factors like the weather and rider's performance, is at least as important. But tough to use to sell wheels.
Is it allowed to use wheels that are demonstrated fast in the wind tunnel and also work on rider performance? Or are those two things mutually exclusive and you have to pick one or the other? -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com ****************************