Good News! Autism NOTcaused by MMR or Thimerosal



"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]... (...)
> > > >
> > > > > Interesting that your "panel" had not one person
> > > > > who was not part
of
> > the
> > > > > conventional team.
> > > >
> > > > That's because the panel had only knowledgable
> > > > scientists.
> > > >
> > > > Read the report at www.nas.edu. Please tell us where
> > > > the conclusions
> are
> > > not
> > > > supported by the data and back up your claims with
> > > > real evidence.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Uh, jeffie, You might not know this, but, a lot of
> > > people do not trust
> > your
> > > "knowledgeable scientists". It might have something to
> > > do with being
> lied
> > to
> > > so many times by "knowledgeable scientists".
> >
> > And a lot of times these so called "knowledgeable
> > scientists" are
quacks:
> > chiropractors, naturopaths, people trying to sell
> > dietary supplements or colon cleansing or other things
> > that don't work.
> >
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> Jeff, your opinion that Chiropractors and Naturopaths are
> "quacks" says it all about your and your "opinions". No
> further need to read your posts, as you do not have the
> open mind necessary for seeking truth.

Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc docots
as being valid medical treatment shows that you have and
advance dopen mind. It is so open that you brain fell out.
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:21Vqc-
> [email protected]...
> >
> > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > recommendations and let us know where they got it wrong.
> > he did add the very reasonable caveate that you should
> > include data when doing so. If you can't or won't do it
> > then just say so.
> >
> > --
> > CBI, MD
> >
> >
> >
> Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press about it.
> I'm simply here debating it. You may have missed it, but
> this is only a NG.

If you think you are debating it then it is your job.
Otherwise, you are just being contrary.

--
CBI, MD
 
"Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > > recommendations and let us know where they got it
> > > wrong. he did add the very reasonable caveate that you
> > > should include data when doing so. If you can't or
> > > won't do it then just say so.
> > >
> > > --
> > > CBI, MD
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press about
> > it. I'm simply
here
> > debating it. You may have missed it, but this is
> > only a NG.
>
> Incorrect. What you are doing is name-calling. Period.
>
> If you wish to debate this, you need to provide real
> evidence.
>
> When you are able to do this, we can talk. Until then,
> Hasta La Vista
baby.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Very good, do not read or reply to me again. Thank you.
 
"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > >
> > > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]... (...)
> > > > >
> > > > > > Interesting that your "panel" had not one person
> > > > > > who was not
part
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > conventional team.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's because the panel had only knowledgable
> > > > > scientists.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read the report at www.nas.edu. Please tell us
> > > > > where the
conclusions
> > are
> > > > not
> > > > > supported by the data and back up your claims with
> > > > > real evidence.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Uh, jeffie, You might not know this, but, a lot of
> > > > people do not
trust
> > > your
> > > > "knowledgeable scientists". It might have something
> > > > to do with being
> > lied
> > > to
> > > > so many times by "knowledgeable scientists".
> > >
> > > And a lot of times these so called "knowledgeable
> > > scientists" are
> quacks:
> > > chiropractors, naturopaths, people trying to sell
> > > dietary supplements
or
> > > colon cleansing or other things that don't work.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > Jeff, your opinion that Chiropractors and Naturopaths
> > are "quacks" says
it
> > all about your and your "opinions". No further need to
> > read your posts,
as
> > you do not have the open mind necessary for seeking
> > truth.
>
> Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc docots
> as being valid medical treatment shows that you have and
> advance dopen mind. It is so
open
> that you brain fell out.
>
>
>
So, you have ran out of snappy comebacks eh?
 
"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email protected]> wrote in message news:<UA5rc.106535>

> Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc docots
> as being valid medical treatment shows that you have and
> advance dopen mind.

"Advance dopen mind" - I'm not sure it is what you meant to
type but I think I like this phrase better.

--
CBI, MD
 
"CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:21V-
> > [email protected]...
> > >
> > > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > > recommendations and let us know where they got it
> > > wrong. he did add the very reasonable caveate that you
> > > should include data when doing so. If you can't or
> > > won't do it then just say so.
> > >
> > > --
> > > CBI, MD
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press about
> > it. I'm simply
here
> > debating it. You may have missed it, but this is
> > only a NG.
>
> If you think you are debating it then it is your job.
> Otherwise, you are just being contrary.
>
> --
> CBI, MD
Contrary, now there's a word one can live with.
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > > > recommendations and let us know where they got it
> > > > wrong. he did add the very reasonable caveate that
> > > > you should include data when doing so. If you can't
> > > > or won't do it then just say so.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CBI, MD
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press about
> > > it. I'm simply
> here
> > > debating it. You may have missed it, but this is only
> > > a NG.
> >
> > Incorrect. What you are doing is name-calling. Period.
> >
> > If you wish to debate this, you need to provide real
> > evidence.
> >
> > When you are able to do this, we can talk. Until then,
> > Hasta La Vista
> baby.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> Very good, do not read or reply to me again. Thank you.

Cannot handle facts, eh?
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:[email protected]... (...)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Interesting that your "panel" had not one
> > > > > > > person who was not
> part
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > conventional team.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's because the panel had only knowledgable
> > > > > > scientists.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read the report at www.nas.edu. Please tell us
> > > > > > where the
> conclusions
> > > are
> > > > > not
> > > > > > supported by the data and back up your claims
> > > > > > with real
evidence.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Uh, jeffie, You might not know this, but, a lot of
> > > > > people do not
> trust
> > > > your
> > > > > "knowledgeable scientists". It might have
> > > > > something to do with
being
> > > lied
> > > > to
> > > > > so many times by "knowledgeable scientists".
> > > >
> > > > And a lot of times these so called "knowledgeable
> > > > scientists" are
> > quacks:
> > > > chiropractors, naturopaths, people trying to sell
> > > > dietary
supplements
> or
> > > > colon cleansing or other things that don't work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > Jeff, your opinion that Chiropractors and Naturopaths
> > > are "quacks"
says
> it
> > > all about your and your "opinions". No further need to
> > > read your
posts,
> as
> > > you do not have the open mind necessary for seeking
> > > truth.
> >
> > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
> > docots as being
valid
> > medical treatment shows that you have and advance dopen
> > mind. It is so
> open
> > that you brain fell out.
> >
> >
> >
> So, you have ran out of snappy comebacks eh?

I chose to accurately describe your state of being.
 
"CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<UA5rc.106535>
>
> > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
> > docots as being
valid
> > medical treatment shows that you have and advance
> > dopen mind.
>
> "Advance dopen mind" - I'm not sure it is what you meant
> to type but I think I like this phrase better.
>
> --
> CBI, MD
Yes, being a drug pushing "MD", I guess you
would............
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > > "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:-
> > > [email protected]
> > > t...
> > > >
> > > > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > > > recommendations and let us know where they got it
> > > > wrong. he did add the very reasonable caveate that
> > > > you should include data when doing so. If you can't
> > > > or won't do it then just say so.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CBI, MD
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press about
> > > it. I'm simply
> here
> > > debating it. You may have missed it, but this is only
> > > a NG.
> >
> > If you think you are debating it then it is your job.
> > Otherwise, you are just being contrary.
> >
> > --
> > CBI, MD
> Contrary, now there's a word one can live with.

MDD is quite contrary, with though processes that are
totally nary.
 
"CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<UA5rc.106535>
>
> > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
> > docots as being
valid
> > medical treatment shows that you have and advance
> > dopen mind.
>
> "Advance dopen mind" - I'm not sure it is what you meant
> to type but I think I like this phrase better.

His mind isso open the brain fell out.
 
"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> > P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email protected]> wrote in
> > message news:[email protected]
> > cv.net...
> > >
> > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > >
> > > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > > > > message news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > > (...)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Interesting that your "panel" had not one
> > > > > > > > person who was not
> > part
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > conventional team.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's because the panel had only knowledgable
> > > > > > > scientists.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read the report at www.nas.edu. Please tell us
> > > > > > > where the
> > conclusions
> > > > are
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > supported by the data and back up your claims
> > > > > > > with real
> evidence.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Uh, jeffie, You might not know this, but, a lot
> > > > > > of people do not
> > trust
> > > > > your
> > > > > > "knowledgeable scientists". It might have
> > > > > > something to do with
> being
> > > > lied
> > > > > to
> > > > > > so many times by "knowledgeable scientists".
> > > > >
> > > > > And a lot of times these so called "knowledgeable
> > > > > scientists" are
> > > quacks:
> > > > > chiropractors, naturopaths, people trying to sell
> > > > > dietary
> supplements
> > or
> > > > > colon cleansing or other things that don't work.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > Jeff, your opinion that Chiropractors and
> > > > Naturopaths are "quacks"
> says
> > it
> > > > all about your and your "opinions". No further need
> > > > to read your
> posts,
> > as
> > > > you do not have the open mind necessary for seeking
> > > > truth.
> > >
> > > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
> > > docots as being
> valid
> > > medical treatment shows that you have and advance
> > > dopen mind. It is so
> > open
> > > that you brain fell out.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > So, you have ran out of snappy comebacks eh?
>
> I chose to accurately describe your state of being.
>
>
>
Well............ If this is your idea of "accurate", it is
easy to understand your years of posting BNS. You are a
pimple on the ass of humanity. Uh Oh! look out! here comes
the pimple "doctor", gonna get you! Duck, hide, run! You
have become too boring to bother with any longer.
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> > P.r.o.b.e.r.t
> [email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<UA5rc.106535>
> >
> > > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
> > > docots as being
> valid
> > > medical treatment shows that you have and advance
> > > dopen mind.
> >
> > "Advance dopen mind" - I'm not sure it is what you meant
> > to type but I think I like this phrase better.
> >
> > --
> > CBI, MD
> Yes, being a drug pushing "MD", I guess you
> would............

Please provide us with evidence that CBI & I are incorrect.
All you have said is that we're closed minded. Prove that we
are incorrect, and you will see if we are closed-minded. Of
course, you have to have the evidence first.

Jeff
 
"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 21, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>...
> > > > "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message news-
> > > > :[email protected]
> > > > net...
> > > > >
> > > > > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > > > > recommendations and let us know where they got it
> > > > > wrong. he did add the very reasonable caveate that
> > > > > you should include data when doing so. If you
> > > > > can't or won't do it then just say so.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > CBI, MD
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press
> > > > about it. I'm simply
> > here
> > > > debating it. You may have missed it, but this is
> > > > only a NG.
> > >
> > > If you think you are debating it then it is your job.
> > > Otherwise, you are just being contrary.
> > >
> > > --
> > > CBI, MD
> > Contrary, now there's a word one can live with.
>
> MDD is quite contrary, with though processes that are
> totally nary.
>
>
>
>
>
Mark, it looks like you need to get your meds adjusted,
again. So you have entered the ignore list.
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> > > P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email protected]> wrote in
> > > message news:[email protected]
> > > y.cv.net...
> > > >
> > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > > > (...)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Interesting that your "panel" had not one
> > > > > > > > > person who was
not
> > > part
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > conventional team.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That's because the panel had only
> > > > > > > > knowledgable scientists.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read the report at www.nas.edu. Please tell
> > > > > > > > us where the
> > > conclusions
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > supported by the data and back up your
> > > > > > > > claims with real
> > evidence.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uh, jeffie, You might not know this, but, a
> > > > > > > lot of people do
not
> > > trust
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > "knowledgeable scientists". It might have
> > > > > > > something to do with
> > being
> > > > > lied
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > so many times by "knowledgeable scientists".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And a lot of times these so called
> > > > > > "knowledgeable scientists"
are
> > > > quacks:
> > > > > > chiropractors, naturopaths, people trying to
> > > > > > sell dietary
> > supplements
> > > or
> > > > > > colon cleansing or other things that don't work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > >
> > > > > Jeff, your opinion that Chiropractors and
> > > > > Naturopaths are "quacks"
> > says
> > > it
> > > > > all about your and your "opinions". No further
> > > > > need to read your
> > posts,
> > > as
> > > > > you do not have the open mind necessary for
> > > > > seeking truth.
> > > >
> > > > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
> > > > docots as being
> > valid
> > > > medical treatment shows that you have and advance
> > > > dopen mind. It is
so
> > > open
> > > > that you brain fell out.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > So, you have ran out of snappy comebacks eh?
> >
> > I chose to accurately describe your state of being.
> >
> >
> >
> Well............ If this is your idea of "accurate", it is
> easy to understand your years of posting BNS. You are a
> pimple on the ass of humanity. Uh Oh! look out! here comes
> the pimple "doctor", gonna get you! Duck, hide, run! You
> have become too boring to bother with any longer.

Success!
 
"Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 20, 2004" <M.a.r.k
>> > P.r.o.b.e.r.t
>> [email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:<UA5rc.106535>
>> >
>> > > Your knee-JERK acceptance of chiroquakers and withc
>> > > docots as being
>> valid
>> > > medical treatment shows that you have and advance
>> > > dopen mind.
>> >
>> > "Advance dopen mind" - I'm not sure it is what you
>> > meant to type but I think I like this phrase better.
>> >
>> > --
>> > CBI, MD
>> Yes, being a drug pushing "MD", I guess you
>> would............
>
> Please provide us with evidence that CBI & I are
> incorrect. All you have said is that we're closed
> minded. Prove that we are incorrect, and you will see if
> we are closed-minded. Of course, you have to have the
> evidence first.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>

I wouldn't hold my breath for any sort of real evidence. I
wouldn't stop eating or drinking or anything else for that
matter either.

r

--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with
DLT tapes.
 
"Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> Please provide us with evidence that CBI & I are
> incorrect. All you have said is that we're closed minded.
> Prove that we are incorrect, and you
will
> see if we are closed-minded. Of course, you have to have
> the evidence
first.
>
> Jeff
>
You are absurd. The "evidence" is everywhere around you.
Remove your head from your ass.
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 21, 2004" <M.a.r.k
> P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:3b-
> > > [email protected]...
> > > > "mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:<[email protected]>...
> > > > > "CBI" <[email protected]> wrote in message ne-
> > > > > ws:[email protected]
> > > > > ink.net...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That would be why he invited you to review their
> > > > > > recommendations and let us know where they got
> > > > > > it wrong. he did add the very reasonable caveate
> > > > > > that you should include data when doing so. If
> > > > > > you can't or won't do it then just say so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > CBI, MD
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Not my job. And I'm not blathering to the press
> > > > > about it. I'm
simply
> > > here
> > > > > debating it. You may have missed it, but this is
> > > > > only a NG.
> > > >
> > > > If you think you are debating it then it is your
> > > > job. Otherwise, you are just being contrary.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CBI, MD
> > > Contrary, now there's a word one can live with.
> >
> > MDD is quite contrary, with though processes that are
> > totally nary.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Mark, it looks like you need to get your meds adjusted,
> again. So you have entered the ignore list.

Ah...success!
 
"Rich.Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> I wouldn't hold my breath for any sort of real evidence. I
> wouldn't stop eating or drinking or anything else for that
> matter either.
>
>
> r
>
> --
>
Nor would you stop being unbelievably stupid, and even proud
of your inability to see or learn anything different.
 
"mdd" <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

>
> "Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> Please provide us with evidence that CBI & I are
>> incorrect. All you have said is that we're closed minded.
>> Prove that we are incorrect, and you
> will
>> see if we are closed-minded. Of course, you have to have
>> the evidence
> first.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
> You are absurd. The "evidence" is everywhere around you.
> Remove your head from your ass.
>
>

Please produce it if it is "all around".

r

--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with
DLT tapes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back