Can we really say that the effect of altitude on time trial performance is as straightforward as the higher you go, the slower you go? Ive always been under the impression that thinner air means less air resistance, which should theoretically result in faster times. But then again, isnt it also true that high altitude environments tend to have more extreme temperature fluctuations, increased UV radiation, and lower oxygen levels - all of which can negatively impact a riders power output and endurance?
And what about the role of acclimatization in all this? If a rider has spent weeks or even months training at high altitude, can we assume that their body has adapted to the point where the negative effects of altitude are greatly diminished? Or are there still underlying physiological limitations that even the most well-acclimatized riders cant overcome?
Ive heard some coaches and trainers claim that the benefits of high-altitude training can be replicated at sea level through the use of altitude masks or tents, but is this really a substitute for the real thing? And if so, why do we still see top-level riders flocking to high-altitude training camps and locales?
Perhaps the biggest question for me, though, is this: are we overestimating the impact of altitude on time trial performance? Are there other factors at play that were not considering - such as road surface, cornering, and drafting - that could potentially have a greater influence on a riders overall time? And if so, are we putting too much stock in the idea that altitude is the primary determinant of success in time trials?
And what about the role of acclimatization in all this? If a rider has spent weeks or even months training at high altitude, can we assume that their body has adapted to the point where the negative effects of altitude are greatly diminished? Or are there still underlying physiological limitations that even the most well-acclimatized riders cant overcome?
Ive heard some coaches and trainers claim that the benefits of high-altitude training can be replicated at sea level through the use of altitude masks or tents, but is this really a substitute for the real thing? And if so, why do we still see top-level riders flocking to high-altitude training camps and locales?
Perhaps the biggest question for me, though, is this: are we overestimating the impact of altitude on time trial performance? Are there other factors at play that were not considering - such as road surface, cornering, and drafting - that could potentially have a greater influence on a riders overall time? And if so, are we putting too much stock in the idea that altitude is the primary determinant of success in time trials?