Can we please settle the debate once and for all: are power meter enthusiasts just delusional for thinking they can accurately quantify aerodynamic drag implications without a wind tunnel at their disposal? I mean, come on, were talking about instruments that are essentially just measuring the resistance your legs are putting out, not the actual air molecules buffeting your bike like a swarm of angry bees.
And dont even get me started on the so-called aero optimizations people make based on these power meter readings - tweaking their helmet vents, switching to aero wheels, and shaving their legs to within an inch of their lives, all in the name of saving a precious 5 watts... meanwhile, the actual aerodynamic drag forces at play are probably laughing at these minor adjustments like a division 1 football team crushing a high school JV squad.
I mean, Im no aero expert (nor do I play one on TV), but doesnt it stand to reason that if youre relying solely on power meter data to inform your aerodynamic decisions, youre essentially trying to solve a calculus problem with nothing but a rusty old abacus? Or am I just totally missing the point here?
And dont even get me started on the so-called aero optimizations people make based on these power meter readings - tweaking their helmet vents, switching to aero wheels, and shaving their legs to within an inch of their lives, all in the name of saving a precious 5 watts... meanwhile, the actual aerodynamic drag forces at play are probably laughing at these minor adjustments like a division 1 football team crushing a high school JV squad.
I mean, Im no aero expert (nor do I play one on TV), but doesnt it stand to reason that if youre relying solely on power meter data to inform your aerodynamic decisions, youre essentially trying to solve a calculus problem with nothing but a rusty old abacus? Or am I just totally missing the point here?