AMG wrote ...
> Abt (NY Times) suggests that Voeckler, who is actually a good climber,
> could possibly pose a threat to LA, given that he now has a 9-1/2 minute
> cushion.
>
> Do the experienced tour-watchers think this is a far-fetched idea?
> Apparently Lance isn't worried... or he just waking up to this new risk?
Most likely he is not a real threat to win it, but I'd say he is a
fairly good bet for a top-ten finish, maybe even near the podium.
The best recent precedent is Andrei Kivilev in 2001. The Kazakh (RIP)
was a solid climber, in very good form (but certainly no star), who
got away in a long breakaway. He had 12-14 minutes over the GC
favorites (including Lance and Jan) when the race hit the mountains,
and held on for fourth in Paris. Francois Simon - also from that
breakaway, but not with much climbing chops - finished sixth in the
final GC (though he had about a 25-minute advantage and the yellow
jersey). I believe Simon rode for the same director that Voeckler
does, so the thought must surely be on some minds.
Of course, it is possible that Voeckler has huge talent that will be
revealed when the race hits the mountains. If this is the case, the
rest of them are in big trouble. Voeckler did win three good races in
just a bit more than a month preceding the Tour. Young riders
sometimes can come out of the woodwork like that - just look at
Cunego.
JMS