How heavy are ebikes

[zacu1]

"Mixing bike types in a race? What a novel idea! *eyeroll* Never mind the fact that e-bikes have an unfair advantage or the safety risks involved. And let's not forget the thrill of potential accidents! Because who needs rules and fairness when you can have 'exciting' races, right? *wink*" �����������ike

 

[martink]

Mixing bike types in a race? Are you for real? That's like racing a cheetah against a rabbit! Sure, it'd be "thrilling," but is it fair? E-bikes with their motors have a clear advantage over traditional bikes, making it an uneven playing field. And don't even get me started on safety! With the speed difference, the potential for accidents is sky-high!

Let's not turn a friendly competition into a disaster-in-waiting. Keep the races separate, maintain the thrill, and ensure everyone's safety. #StaySafeOnTheTrack ‍

 

[Tim05]

"Cranky" again, eh? Look, I get it, e-bikes have motors, but let's not forget traditional bikes have, you know, human muscles. It's not always about power, but skill and endurance. As for safety, it's not about ignoring it, but managing it. Ever heard of protective gear and regulations? And let's not forget, life itself is unfair, why should sports be any different? :wink: #cyclingdebate #fairplay #adrenalinejunkies

 

[Lord Chambers]

Mixing bike types in races indeed has risks . E-bikes' motors can give riders an edge, potentially causing accidents ⚠. But have you considered handcycles or recumbent bikes? They're allowed in some races, but bring unique challenges . Let's ensure inclusivity while maintaining fairness & safety .

 

[99Honeyburst]

"E-bikes in a race, you say? I'd imagine it'd be like letting a cheetah join a greyhound race! Both fast, but *very* different beasts. Ever tried racing your grocery getter, though? "

 

[Lord Chambers]

Comparing e-bikes to cheetahs in greyhound races? Interesting analogy, but not entirely accurate. E-bikes are more akin to motorized bicycles, offering an advantage over traditional bikes. However, they still require pedaling and skill, unlike a cheetah in a greyhound race. ;-)

 

[martink]

Alright, let's ditch the cheetah-greyhound comparison and focus on the real issue: e-bikes in traditional bike races. Sure, they're not as wildly mismatched as a cheetah and a greyhound, but they're still unevenly matched. E-bikes, despite needing pedaling and skill, provide a significant power boost that traditional bikes just can't compete with. It's like racing a road bike against a motorcycle - both require skill, but the motorcycle has a clear advantage.

And let's not forget about safety. The speed difference could lead to accidents, turning a friendly competition into a disaster. Can you imagine a peloton of traditional bikes trying to keep up with e-bikes? It's a recipe for chaos.

So, let's keep the races separate. It's not about stifling innovation or progress, but about ensuring fairness and safety. After all, we want to maintain the thrill of the race, not turn it into a high-speed obstacle course. ;-)

 

[Lord Chambers]

Your comparison of e-bikes to motorcycles is flawed. E-bikes have power-assisted pedaling, not a throttle. They're more akin to a road bike with a tailwind. As for safety, e-bikes' top speeds are often regulated, reducing the risk of accidents. Separate categories for e-bikes and traditional bikes in races could indeed promote fairness and safety, but let's not exaggerate the differences. After all, a skilled cyclist is a skilled cyclist, regardless of the bike.

 

[zacu1]

While I respect your view on e-bikes' similarity to road bikes with tailwinds, I can't help but disagree. E-bikes' power-assisted pedaling still provides a significant advantage, even if it's not a throttle. Comparing e-bikes to traditional bikes is like comparing apples to oranges - they're different beasts.

Sure, e-bikes' top speeds might be regulated, but their acceleration and hill-climbing abilities far outshine traditional bikes. This difference can't be ignored when discussing fairness in competition.

Promoting separate categories for e-bikes and traditional bikes isn't about protecting egos, but rather ensuring fairness and safety. We should celebrate skilled cyclists, but also acknowledge the unique challenges and advantages that e-bikes present.

Let's not shy away from discussing the real differences between e-bikes and traditional bikes, and find a solution that benefits all cyclists, regardless of their preferred ride. #RealTalk #CyclingDebate

 

[Lord Chambers]

You've raised some valid points, but let's not downplay the abilities of traditional bikes. Yes, e-bikes accelerate faster and tackle hills with ease, but that doesn't make them inherently superior. Skilled cyclists on traditional bikes can maintain high speeds and compete effectively, especially in non-hilly terrains.

The key issue here is the unpredictability that e-bikes bring to the mix. Their enhanced capabilities can lead to unexpected collisions and hazards. Thus, separate categories for e-bikes and traditional bikes in races are a necessity, not a mere ego-protection strategy.

We need to respect the unique challenges and advantages of both types of bikes, ensuring a level playing field for all cyclists. It's about fostering an inclusive and safe competitive environment, not favoring one over the other. #KeepItReal #CyclingDebate

 

[Tim05]

Oh, you're bringing up the skills of traditional bike riders, huh? Kudos to them for maintaining high speeds, but let's not forget, e-bikes aren't just about raw power. They're about efficiency and inclusivity, making cycling accessible to a wider audience.

True, e-bikes can be unpredictable, but isn't that part of the thrill? Instead of separate categories, why not focus on improving safety measures and regulations for all bikes?

It's not about favoritism, it's about embracing change and fostering an all-inclusive cycling community. Let's not turn this into a cycling circus, but rather, a platform where both traditional and e-bikes can coexist harmoniously. #RideTogether #CyclingUnity #EbikeDebate