S
Sandy
Guest
While I have commented regularly on the doping issue, and disclosed long ago
that I am a lawyer, I think I have tried to maintain my opinions unformed as
to the Landis matter. And I plan to do so, still.
However, I want to point out one thing, which I find 125% offensive, and I
am not going to avoid potential backlash from the persons I identify.
In Velo News (which I subscribed to, long ago, while it was in the East, and
I was in the USA), they have engaged a lawyer to write daily commentary on
the Landis arbitration. I cite here the headers for his page :
===
The Landis hearing: Day 5 - A lawyer's view
By Antonio Gallegos
for VeloNews.com
This report filed May 18, 2007
===
Editor's Note: Denver-based attorney Antonio Gallegos is in Malibu,
California, this week to observe the Floyd Landis arbitration hearing.
Gallegos works for the firm of Holland and Hart, concentrating in commercial
litigation and government investigation. He is also an avid cyclist and is
developing a sports law practice.
===
My comment is that Mr Gallegos, in his writing, makes a specific effort to
display and realize his personal desire to develop a sports law practice -
evidently one which would defend athletes - by reporting the proceedings in
a slanted manner, one which is designed to attract his potential clients.
None of that is improper under ethical codes for lawyers. None of what he
writes is patently untrue. The publication of his articles, as they appear,
is exceptionally bad journalism, in my view, and his presentation of the day
is not a fair representation of the arbitration. My opinion.
Perhaps some reading this post recall that I doggedly refused to let Mark
Hickey get away with believing just one side of the dispute. You probably
don't know that I have always hoped that Landis would prevail. You should
already know that I think there are significant and fundamental violations
of many laws in the UCI enveloped world.
I write this to make a personal recommendation that you not use these
articles as a good basis of reporting. That's it. Fallout is expected.
--
Bonne route !
Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR
that I am a lawyer, I think I have tried to maintain my opinions unformed as
to the Landis matter. And I plan to do so, still.
However, I want to point out one thing, which I find 125% offensive, and I
am not going to avoid potential backlash from the persons I identify.
In Velo News (which I subscribed to, long ago, while it was in the East, and
I was in the USA), they have engaged a lawyer to write daily commentary on
the Landis arbitration. I cite here the headers for his page :
===
The Landis hearing: Day 5 - A lawyer's view
By Antonio Gallegos
for VeloNews.com
This report filed May 18, 2007
===
Editor's Note: Denver-based attorney Antonio Gallegos is in Malibu,
California, this week to observe the Floyd Landis arbitration hearing.
Gallegos works for the firm of Holland and Hart, concentrating in commercial
litigation and government investigation. He is also an avid cyclist and is
developing a sports law practice.
===
My comment is that Mr Gallegos, in his writing, makes a specific effort to
display and realize his personal desire to develop a sports law practice -
evidently one which would defend athletes - by reporting the proceedings in
a slanted manner, one which is designed to attract his potential clients.
None of that is improper under ethical codes for lawyers. None of what he
writes is patently untrue. The publication of his articles, as they appear,
is exceptionally bad journalism, in my view, and his presentation of the day
is not a fair representation of the arbitration. My opinion.
Perhaps some reading this post recall that I doggedly refused to let Mark
Hickey get away with believing just one side of the dispute. You probably
don't know that I have always hoped that Landis would prevail. You should
already know that I think there are significant and fundamental violations
of many laws in the UCI enveloped world.
I write this to make a personal recommendation that you not use these
articles as a good basis of reporting. That's it. Fallout is expected.
--
Bonne route !
Sandy
Verneuil-sur-Seine FR