konasunset said:
Hello Alienator I want to thank you. You have inspired me to write a research paper. I have been uncovering loads of great information from multiple reputable sources. Just google 'resonant frequency'. Every organism on this planet has a resonant frequency. This theory seems to originate with Nicola Tesla. Of course they thought he was a quack also... but he invented the radio, AC electricity, X-rays, wireless technology... and made a whole lot of other useful and amazing discoveries. Many scientists understand the theory that every organism as well as inanimate matter... has a resonant frequency. A rate at which it vibrates which is measured in Hertz. Ok so the human body has an ideal resonant frequency in which it is enabled to heal itself much easier and be virtually completely resistant to disease... because its cells resonate at a higher frequency than the frequency of the cells of the attacking virus or bacteria...etc.
First, when making a scientific argument, you can't claim something is true just because some authority said it was. You have to base the argument on results of tests, calculations, and the like. For example, using Tesla as proof that vegetables resonate and that this has something to do with health is a non-starter. If you do that, the first thing you have to do is acknowledge the errors Tesla made. For example, Tesla believed that the General Theory of Relativity was/is wrong. He believed that everything was energy, that there was no space-time to bend. However, the GTR has been verified many times, including the discovery of the precession of Mercury's perihelion in it's solar orbit and how that precession matched the prediction from GTR; through the many examples of gravitational lensing; and through the succesful demonstrations of time proceeding at different rates on Earth and in Space.
More simply, in science there is no "authority" in human form. The "authority" is the method and proof. Full stop. Tesla did zero experiments and obtained zero results that speak to your claims re: resonance, "life-force", healing, health, and so on.
The Earth itself vibrates within a certain range of resonant frequency of 3-69 Hertz. This is called the Schumann Resonance.
The Earth does not "resonate" at Schumann frequencies. The Earth's electric field does have a set of points in it's spectrum that correspond to electric discharges, specifically lightning. The Earth doesn't resonante: it's electric field does, at certain frequencies, low frequencies, when lighting is going off. Those frequencies are those at which the Schumann resonance occurs.
It's never been scientifically shown that there is systemic resonant frequency of the human corpus or of lettuce. Elements of the human body can resonate. For example, Hydrogen nuclei can resonate and radiate radio waves when the human body--and even lettuce--is exposed to a magnetic field or an oscillating electromagetic field. Uhm, that's Nuclear Magnetic Resonance imaging is all about.
You seem to be confused about resonance itself. Resonance is not something that exits in isolation. Resonance is the response to an outside force or field. It is a finite response, although in terms of some astronomical events, the half life of that response can be quite long. You see, for resonance to be a permanent state, you need infinite energy to excite said resonant condition forever. There has never been scientific identification of any temporally unbounded resonance in nature. The source can't be gravity, about the only long acting force I can think of (Even that's not really true, as Gravity isn't considered to be constant but instead related to the radius of the Universe. Given that most cosmological models now consider the Universe to be ever expanding, gravitational force will eventually approach zero). You can see from the mathematical definition of gravity (F=G*m1*m2/r^2) there is no source for the oscillation. So there is no other source available to provide resonance without bound.
My point is... if you do the research you will find it. Not from quacks but even from scientists from places like Oxford... and specifically in the research of Nicola Tesla.
This is a throw away statement which does nothing to further your arguments. The reference to Oxford is another authority argument which as stated earlier proves absolutely nothing and serves no purpose in a scientific or otherwise objective argument.
I don't expect anyone to believe this... in fact I expect quite the opposite. It takes a developed spiritual mind and also a fearlessness to believe a theory which is not spoonfed to us in school,.. or on television. But that is where visionaries pave the path for humanity... which is blinded primarily by its own pride, greed. and selfishness.
So, science is spoon fed? Actually science is based on rigorous procedure, namely the Scientific Method. I'll leave it to you to look up the definition if you're not already familiar with it. Implicit in that method is the idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And, as it happens, the method allows others to test the claims and results on their own, exactly duplicating the claimants experimental setup and procedure. Again, none of your claims have held up to scientific scrutiny. This scrutiny can't be held lightly or treated lightly, because at its core, it's designed to prevent influence of human bias on experiments. There are a multitude of examples wherein experimenters didn't hold to the method and thus made tragic flaws. Look up Dr's Fleischmann and Pons and their infamous declaration in 1989 re: cold fusion.
Let me say it again: there hasn't been a single report in a scientific journal that supports your claims re: the links between resonance, life-force, healing, et al. If you'd like to place your beliefs and/or claims in the realm of pseudoscience, junk science, mysticism, religion, or some other such category, you are free to do so as those categories do not require any sort of rigorous proof. Don't be quick, though, to disregard rigorous proof. Over 400 years of it have vetted Newtonian Mechanics. For nearly the last century, it has continued to verify claims of the theories of Special Relativity and General Relativity, and predictions of Quantum Mechanics, all three being things that science, at the beginning, and in the middle, of the last century found difficult to swallow.
As for your statement in general, it is not a valid scientific argument. It is a statement of philosophy and/or of religion, neither of which require objectivity. Moreover, your statement precludes argument: given there is an opposing side, in an argument, your statement tries to immediately label the opposing argument as wrong because it doesn't come from what you call "developed spiritual mind." In essence, you're saying if someone doesn't believe your religion, they're wrong, no matter what objective analysis shows.
So thank you Alienator for your challenge. Without you I wouldn't have made some important dicoveries which have strengthened my convictions about this theory. Enjoy your day. If you ever respond to me rudely again... I will never respond to you. So it's up to you if you want to be friends or enemies. But I still accept you as a human being. You are smart but incredibly arrogant. Just remember that pride comes before a fall....
I hope your post wasn't your research paper. I look forward to reading your "paper" when you're finished with it. The rest of this last quote by you really does nothing for your argument.
