General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

running w/eyewear?

Started by Lanceandrew · · Last activity · 22 posts · 682 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 January 2005
Last activity
8 January 2005
Original author
Lanceandrew
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
682
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. anyone out there wear non-perscript eyewear as a matter of habit? i've not
    raced in a pair in a long time...but i generally like to wear a pair while
    training. ...i actually have commonly worn eyewear to protect against all the
    [censored] that tends to lodge in your eye while spring/summer/fall training.
    foliage debris, bugs, etc. i've been wearing Bolle 784 rogue dual lens
    sunglasses, before that it was H2Optix Serengeti glasses.

    i really like the changeable lens type to calibrate for conditions. never had
    a pair of native eyewear though and just ordered a pair on-line at reioutlet.
    this is no commercial or product placement effort on my part...just looking to
    share what seemed to me like a real good deal on a pair of quality glasses well
    suited for runners. you'll see on reioutlet's homepage their 'deal of the day'
    is for native eyewear nano squared polarized glasses. got'em for $40 shipping
    included. they seem to have all the right features for us runners (anti-fog
    design, adjustable nose supporting...etc..)...best of all though you get 3 sets
    of lenses with them...including a clear set for night running. the extra
    lenses though don't seem to be polarized.....however i do like slipping in the
    red lens on my Bolle glasses.

    i know some runners who've spent $100-$200 on a pair of non-perscript eyewear.
    the most i've ever dropped was $50 on a pair. anyway....if you've been
    considering a pair...you might want to check out this native deal w/reioutlet.
    campmor of course always has decent deals on glasses too. again, never have
    had a pair of this native brand before....sure hope they work out. i do see a
    lot of runners race in eyewear as a matter of habit though...anyone on the ng
    wear non-perscript eyewear like this?...training and racing?

  2. Lanceandrew said:


    anyone out there wear non-perscript eyewear as a matter of habit?

    I bought a pair of Rudy Project sunglasses 5 years ago for $100 that I
    wear "as a matter of habit", I suppose. They work just as well now as
    when new, except for a few lens scratches, so I don't see myself buying
    another pair soon, knock on wood.

    -J

  3. Lanceandrew <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    anyone out there wear non-perscript eyewear as a matter of habit? i've


    not

    Quoted message said:

    raced in a pair in a long time...but i generally like to wear a pair while
    training. ...i actually have commonly worn eyewear to protect against all


    the

    Quoted message said:

    [censored] that tends to lodge in your eye while spring/summer/fall training.
    foliage debris, bugs, etc. i've been wearing Bolle 784 rogue dual lens
    sunglasses, before that it was H2Optix Serengeti glasses.

    I wear a pair of inexpensive sunglasses even on overcast days for the same
    reasons you mentioned. I wear contact lenses. When I'm running, and I get
    into a good rhythm I don't seem to blink as often as usual. The sunglasses
    do a good job of protecting me from dirt and other debris in the air. I
    can't imagine spending a lot of money on these. They do get scratched up,
    and I've lost them pretty frequently.
    Michelle

  4. "Lanceandrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    anyone out there wear non-perscript eyewear as a matter of habit?
    i've not
    raced in a pair in a long time...but i generally like to wear a pair
    while
    training. ...i actually have commonly worn eyewear to protect against
    all the
    [censored] that tends to lodge in your eye while spring/summer/fall
    training.
    foliage debris, bugs, etc. i've been wearing Bolle 784 rogue dual
    lens
    sunglasses, before that it was H2Optix Serengeti glasses.

    Come on Lance, you just want to look cool. 😉

    -DF

  5. use to think it was cool.
    now just go with whatever wearing,
    country wear. old eyes see good.
    "No wear" eye wear.
    LowtucBikeRider

    or contact.
    e-mail. [email hidden]

  6. (Lanceandrew) said:


    anyone out there wear non-perscript eyewear as a matter of habit? . . .

    I almost always wear non-prescription glasses. Perhaps because I work in a
    machine shop, I feel more comfortable with eye protection. Also my doctor
    wants me to protect my eyes from harmful UV rays, so I wear the dark
    glasses on daytime runs. I wear the clear lens glasses at night about half
    the time. I like cheap safety glasses, which are available tinted or
    clear. I use UVEX "Genesis" with the "XTR" antifog coating in either clear
    or "Espresso" (brown tint) with Chums retention strap (glasses: see for
    example www.grainger.com part nos. 6XF73 clear and 6XF75 tinted) -- or the
    Willson "Cruiser" in clear (grainger no. 3PA48) and "Cappuccino" (grainger
    no. 3PA50). The Willson "Cruiser" comes with a retention cord, and they
    are cheaper. Both of these styles are very light weight, and designed to
    be worn by workers who sweat. These are available at industrial supply
    stores, hardware stores, etc.
    --
    Daniel
    [email hidden]

  7. Lanceandrew said...

    Quoted message said:


    anyone out there wear non-perscript eyewear as a matter of habit?

    I always wear shades in races as a competitive advantage. I know it makes the
    other runners nervous when they can't see your eyes. It's a lot easier to
    sneak up on and pass a runner when you are wearing shades. ;-)

    The other reason is tearing due to wind. With contacts, just the speed of my
    running is often enough to cause tearing.

  8. "Lanceandrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    anyone on the ng
    wear non-perscript eyewear like this?...training and racing?

    Yes. But only when it's sunny, you twit.

    Roger.

  9. np426z said:

    Yes. But only when it's sunny, you twit.

    Roger.

    So YOU are Roger, or you and Roger are twins, whom your
    mommy considered a wit, thus making each of you a half-wit?

  10. Quoted message said:
    np426z said:

    Roger.

    Quoted message said:

    So YOU are Roger,

    Golly, well done! For a self proclaimed internet master, that took
    you some time to fathom :-)

    BTW, 'Wobbot' to whom I infrequently refer is the individual you know
    as 'Fabulustrunner', 'Tom' or whatever he calls himself now.

    Actually, I wouldn't be at all surprised if you aren't one of his new
    persona.

    Quoted message said:

    or you and Roger are twins, whom your
    mommy considered a wit, thus making each of you a half-wit?

    Yunno, reading your posts is akin to listening to a Bob Hope show. It
    was probably the height of hilarity in the 50's or 60's when you were a
    lad, but the humour is somewhat sad and dated now.

    C'mon. Old guys like you need their rest. Take a break from the pc,
    go lie down and dream of Dorothy Lamour. Remember? She *was* a
    babe...!

    Roger <just who IS np426z???>

  11. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    np426z said:

    Roger.

    Quoted message said:

    So YOU are Roger,

    Golly, well done! For a self proclaimed internet master, that took
    you some time to fathom :-)

    Never proclaimed such. Only proclaimed that I've been in ngs
    since the late 1980s and had seen just about every kind of nuts
    and their tricks.

    Quoted message said:


    BTW, 'Wobbot' to whom I infrequently refer is the individual you know
    as 'Fabulustrunner', 'Tom' or whatever he calls himself now.

    I had also referred to him as DF, when he was acting smart like
    you have been. But he was smarter than many, and quit being an
    ankle-biter on my posts, and so I reverted back to FabulustRunner,
    whom I actually defended when he was attacked by other DFs who
    said he should be killfiled. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, I wouldn't be at all surprised if you aren't one of his new
    persona.

    Then it showed how LITTLE you know about me. Do a little homework
    on google and you'll KNOW that it can't possibly be.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    or you and Roger are twins, whom your
    mommy considered a wit, thus making each of you a half-wit?

    Yunno, reading your posts is akin to listening to a Bob Hope show.

    That's good enough for me.

    Quoted message said:

    C'mon. Old guys like you need their rest. Take a break from the


    pc,

    Quoted message said:

    go lie down and dream of Dorothy Lamour. Remember? She *was* a
    babe...!

    Not bad for a half-wit, Roge.

    Quoted message said:

    Roger <just who IS np426z???>

    Why don't you tell us.
    -- Bob. (bu Hope NOT; Dole NOT; and Jones NOT).

  12. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    np426z said:

    Roger.

    Quoted message said:

    So YOU are Roger,

    Golly, well done! For a self proclaimed internet master, that took
    you some time to fathom :-)

    Never proclaimed such. Only proclaimed that I've been in ngs
    since the late 1980s and had seen just about every kind of nuts
    and their tricks.

    Quoted message said:


    BTW, 'Wobbot' to whom I infrequently refer is the individual you know
    as 'Fabulustrunner', 'Tom' or whatever he calls himself now.

    I had also referred to him as DF, when he was acting smart like
    you have been. But he was smarter than many, and quit being an
    ankle-biter on my posts, and so I reverted back to FabulustRunner,
    whom I actually defended when he was attacked by other DFs who
    said he should be killfiled. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, I wouldn't be at all surprised if you aren't one of his new
    persona.

    Then it showed how LITTLE you know about me. Do a little homework
    on google and you'll KNOW that it can't possibly be.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    or you and Roger are twins, whom your
    mommy considered a wit, thus making each of you a half-wit?

    Yunno, reading your posts is akin to listening to a Bob Hope show.

    That's good enough for me.

    Quoted message said:

    C'mon. Old guys like you need their rest. Take a break from the


    pc,

    Quoted message said:

    go lie down and dream of Dorothy Lamour. Remember? She *was* a
    babe...!

    Not bad for a half-wit, Roge.

    Quoted message said:

    Roger <just who IS np426z???>

    Why don't you tell us.
    -- Bob. (bu Hope NOT; Dole NOT; and Jones NOT).

  13. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    np426z said:

    Roger.

    Quoted message said:

    So YOU are Roger,

    Golly, well done! For a self proclaimed internet master, that took
    you some time to fathom :-)

    Never proclaimed such. Only proclaimed that I've been in ngs
    since the late 1980s and had seen just about every kind of nuts
    and their tricks.

    Quoted message said:


    BTW, 'Wobbot' to whom I infrequently refer is the individual you know
    as 'Fabulustrunner', 'Tom' or whatever he calls himself now.

    I had also referred to him as DF, when he was acting smart like
    you have been. But he was smarter than many, and quit being an
    ankle-biter on my posts, and so I reverted back to FabulustRunner,
    whom I actually defended when he was attacked by other DFs who
    said he should be killfiled. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, I wouldn't be at all surprised if you aren't one of his new
    persona.

    Then it showed how LITTLE you know about me. Do a little homework
    on google and you'll KNOW that it can't possibly be.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    or you and Roger are twins, whom your
    mommy considered a wit, thus making each of you a half-wit?

    Yunno, reading your posts is akin to listening to a Bob Hope show.

    That's good enough for me.

    Quoted message said:

    C'mon. Old guys like you need their rest. Take a break from the


    pc,

    Quoted message said:

    go lie down and dream of Dorothy Lamour. Remember? She *was* a
    babe...!

    Not bad for a half-wit, Roge.

    Quoted message said:

    Roger <just who IS np426z???>

    Why don't you tell us.
    -- Bob. (bu Hope NOT; Dole NOT; and Jones NOT).

  14. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Never proclaimed such. Only proclaimed that I've been in ngs
    since the late 1980s and had seen just about every kind of nuts
    and their tricks.

    Then you're old enough to know you'll never see it all. There's
    always something or someone that'll blindside you at 3:17 on a wet
    Thursday afternoon. I'm not suggesting it'll be me, but it'll be
    someone...

    Quoted message said:

    I had also referred to him as DF, when he was acting smart like
    you have been. But he was smarter than many, and quit being an
    ankle-biter on my posts, and so I reverted back to FabulustRunner,
    whom I actually defended when he was attacked by other DFs who
    said he should be killfiled. :-)

    And that waffle is, like, meant to encourage me to do the same? Or do
    you simply enjoy our little chats and don't want me to leave?
    Whatever. I'll p*ss on you when my bladder needs the exercise, and
    leave you alone when it don't. Sound fair?

    Quoted message said:

    Then it showed how LITTLE you know about me.

    Or how LITTLE I care? You do know that this is a pretend world we're
    in, no?

    Quoted message said:

    Do a little homework
    on google and you'll KNOW that it can't possibly be.

    Heavens, do you think yourself *that* interesting? I google people
    who worry me - and there have been a few - not those who savage me like
    a fluffy kitten.

    Quoted message said:

    That's good enough for me.

    I suspected as much.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Roger <just who IS np426z???>


    Why don't you tell us.


    Why should I bother? I'm not that interesting.

    Roger.

  15. Rog, Rog, must you feed the.... fish?

  16. Paul Wilson said:

    Rog, Rog, must you feed the.... fish?

    Of course I must. Every ...fish?... needs a helping hand now and then
    :-)

    Roger.

  17. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:


    Paul Wilson said:

    Rog, Rog, must you feed the.... fish?

    Of course I must. Every ...fish?... needs a helping hand now and then
    :-)

    Not necessarily. If you handle fish you rub off some their protective slime.
    This can later lead to infections. So it's usually best if fish are left alone
    in their own slime.

  18. Paul Wilson said:

    Not necessarily. If you handle fish you rub off some their protective


    slime.

    Quoted message said:

    This can later lead to infections. So it's usually best if fish are


    left alone

    Quoted message said:

    in their own slime.

    You've failed to observe that my genus is fishy too. I am, therefore,
    totally immune to the infections caused by close proximity to fish.

    Actually, wtf are we talking about? He's a troll, I'm a troll, leave
    us alone in our playground, will ya?

    Bloody bully!

    Roger.

  19. Paul Wilson said:

    Not necessarily. If you handle fish you rub off some their protective


    slime.

    Quoted message said:

    This can later lead to infections. So it's usually best if fish are


    left alone

    Quoted message said:

    in their own slime.

    You've failed to observe that my genus is fishy too. I am, therefore,
    totally immune to the infections caused by close proximity to fish.

    Actually, wtf are we talking about? He's a troll, I'm a troll, leave
    us alone in our playground, will ya?

    Bloody bully!

    Roger.

  20. [email hidden] wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    You've failed to observe that my genus is fishy too. I am, therefore,
    totally immune to the infections caused by close proximity to fish.

    Actually, wtf are we talking about? He's a troll, I'm a troll, leave
    us alone in our playground, will ya?

    Well, there is honor among thieves, so I hoped for a little pride among trolls.
    Clearly, I was grossly mistaken.

    With sincerest apologies. Please carry on.

    Quoted message said:

    Bloody bully!

    I probably deserved that. Still .... it hurts.
    Fortunately, running taught me how to handle pain, so I'll be OK.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.