"Aramanth Dawe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]
|| On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:24:30 GMT, "Dominic Lloyd"
|| <[email hidden]> wrote:
||
|||| We all know that it's a common mistake for newbies to confuse
|||| low-carb with high protein; they're not necessaril the same thing;
|||
||| marengo, as a newbie, i would be greatly assisted by a little more
||| detali on this. can you point me in the right direction?
||
|| Once you eliminate the refined grains and starches you lose the blood
|| sugar swings - up high after a carb-heavy meal, then dipping low
|| about 2 hours later, so you refeed (candy bar, coffee with lots of
|| sugar, sandwich) and up you go again - and many people find
|| themselves becoming far less hungry than before. It becomes
|| automatic to eat smaller overall meals and/or eat less often during
|| the day. Many people believe this, rather than any 'metabolic
|| advantage' is why most people who try low carb find it an easier
|| diet than a low fat diet to maintain.
||
|| In this fashion, many low-carbers find that they are eating no more
|| protein in a day than people who don't low-carb. As an example - 2
|| people walk into your standard fast-food place for a quick lunch.
|| One buys a 'meal deal' - burger, fries and soft drink, the other
|| buys the same burger, diet soda and ditches the bun. Neither one
|| has eaten more *protein*, but I'll almost guarantee the one who
|| didn't eat fries or bun will be less hungry later. If the second
|| person also gets a side-salad they'll be even better off with added
|| fibre in the vegetables in their salad, assuming they avoid sugary
|| dressings.
||
|| Aramanth
Exactly. Also, I've found in the past few years that I eat a higher
percentage of fat in my meals. Not because I've increased eating fat, but
because of the reduced carbohydrates. And due to the dynamic that you
described, I find that I lose weight the fastest -- and/or enjoy optimum
health benefits -- when I maintain the ratio of fat/protein/carbs that I
have found through experience that works best for me. And for me that ratio
is about:
75% fat
20% protein
5% carbohydrates
(YMMV)
Thisis percentage of total calories consumed of course, not portion
percentages. (I realize this can be confusing also, -- since fat has more
calories per gram (9) than protein (4) or carbs (4), it take less fat to
make up more calories).
The reason this ratio works for me is twofold:
#1. I'm T2 diabetic, and it eliminates the blood sugar swings (exactly
as you describe) an allows me to control my diabetes with diet alone
#2. For the same reason (no blood sugar/insulin swings), I don't get
hungry.
I agree with you Aramanth, that it's the lack of hunger that is more likely
causing the weight loss than a "metabolic advantage." But I'm not a
scientist, and all I know for sure is ... it works!
--
Peter
270/219/180
website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo