On Wed, 18 May 2005 17:30:43 -0400, "Phil,
Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:33:08 -0400, "Phil,
Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
[snip]
Quoted message said:I don't get it. Aren't bents immune from pedal bob from the getgo?
[snip]
Dear Phil,
Have a look at this recumbent pedal-kickback (pogo effect)
suspension calculator:
http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm
On an upright with suspension, pedal bob is more a matter of
the rider stomping up and down on the pedals and the
suspension bobbing in reaction to vertical forces.
On a recumbent with suspension, pedal kickback is more a
matter of the rider pushing horizontally on the pedals and
the tightening chain pulling the two halves of the frame
together.
Your explanation made a lot more sense than the link did. Thanks.
Dear Phil,
Below its calculator, the Kreuzotter link does explain
things:
"Chain tension generates a torque upon the swingarm, if
pedal kick back is different from zero, because only then
the chain is able to "pull" the swingarm to a different
angle."
http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm
It may be a bit Germanic in phrasing, but the main point is
there. It's a recumbent site, so you can't expect much fuss
about uprights, in which the main pedal force is exerted
downward, not horizontally.
Incidentally, the recumbent suspension bobbing is pretty
much a matter of the frame hunching up like an earthworm
each time that the the rider pushes hard against the pedal.
On an upright, this chain-tightening effect is overwhelmed
by the downward force of the rider's leg thrust--the
suspension squashes and spreads out instead of rising up.
Carl Fogel