Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

make a softtail into a hardtail?

Started by Steve Knight · · Last activity · 20 posts · 745 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 May 2005
Last activity
21 May 2005
Original author
Steve Knight
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
745
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anyone know of a bar to replace a shock on my suspension bent? It uses a
    standard shock. I find that if I have enough air in it to get rid of the pedal
    bounce the rear wheel slams down into all holes very hard. I am about 210 but I
    need about 250psi in it to keep the bounce down. If I have about 100 or so PSI
    the bounce is gone and no slamming and the lack of the shock is not that big of
    a deal.
    I don't want to have to spend 300.00 or so for a good shock that would let me
    control the problems. So if I could remove the shock and just replace it with a
    spacer that would be good. Save some weight too.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

  2. Steve Knight said:

    Anyone know of a bar to replace a shock on my suspension bent? It uses a
    standard shock. I find that if I have enough air in it to get rid of the pedal
    bounce the rear wheel slams down into all holes very hard. I am about 210 but I
    need about 250psi in it to keep the bounce down. If I have about 100 or so PSI
    the bounce is gone and no slamming and the lack of the shock is not that big of
    a deal.
    I don't want to have to spend 300.00 or so for a good shock that would let me
    control the problems. So if I could remove the shock and just replace it with a
    spacer that would be good. Save some weight too.

    Dear Steve,

    If you haven't already checked, here are two related sites
    that offer calculators about recumbent suspension and pedal
    kick-back:

    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/efeder.htm

    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm

    If you stuff your dimensions into these, they might suggest
    a suspension solution or at least a length for the bar that
    you have in mind.

    If you switch to a bar, you may have to find a machine shop
    to get something the right length and strength that will
    attach to your particular shock mounts.

    Carl Fogel

  3. "Steve Knight" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know of a bar to replace a shock on my suspension bent? It uses a
    standard shock. I find that if I have enough air in it to get rid of the
    pedal
    bounce the rear wheel slams down into all holes very hard. I am about 210
    but I
    need about 250psi in it to keep the bounce down. If I have about 100 or so
    PSI
    the bounce is gone and no slamming and the lack of the shock is not that
    big of
    a deal.
    I don't want to have to spend 300.00 or so for a good shock that would
    let me
    control the problems. So if I could remove the shock and just replace it
    with a
    spacer that would be good. Save some weight too.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

    One of these might fit:
    http://www.progressivesuspension.com/cvt5.html

    They have two stage compression, allowing a stable platform for pedalling
    and open up for bigger hits.
    There are other versions now too - they're quite common in the MB world.

    AndyC

  4. Steve Knight said:

    Anyone know of a bar to replace a shock on my suspension bent? It uses a
    standard shock. I find that if I have enough air in it to get rid of the pedal
    bounce the rear wheel slams down into all holes very hard. I am about 210 but I
    need about 250psi in it to keep the bounce down. If I have about 100 or so PSI
    the bounce is gone and no slamming and the lack of the shock is not that big of
    a deal.
    I don't want to have to spend 300.00 or so for a good shock that would let me
    control the problems. So if I could remove the shock and just replace it with a
    spacer that would be good. Save some weight too.

    If the thing slams into holes when you pump it up until it doesn't
    work any more, what makes you think that replacing it with a metal bar
    will change that situation?

    The idea behind the shock is to keep from jarring you when you hit
    bumps, since you can't climb out of the saddle on a recumbent. Get
    rid of the shock absorber and your body will have to absorb all the
    shock instead.

    If you want to replace the shock with a metal bar, just get a metal
    bar about 1/2" thick (or whatever matches your shock) about the length
    of the shock and drill two holes in it.

  5. dkd said:
    Steve Knight said:

    Anyone know of a bar to replace a shock on my suspension bent? It
    uses a standard shock. I find that if I have enough air in it to get
    rid of the pedal bounce the rear wheel slams down into all holes
    very hard. I am about 210 but I need about 250psi in it to keep the
    bounce down. If I have about 100 or so PSI the bounce is gone and no
    slamming and the lack of the shock is not that big of a deal.
    I don't want to have to spend 300.00 or so for a good shock that
    would let me control the problems. So if I could remove the shock
    and just replace it with a spacer that would be good. Save some
    weight too.

    I don't get it. Aren't bents immune from pedal bob from the getgo?

    Quoted message said:

    If the thing slams into holes when you pump it up until it doesn't
    work any more, what makes you think that replacing it with a metal bar
    will change that situation?

    I was thinking the same thing.

    Quoted message said:

    The idea behind the shock is to keep from jarring you when you hit
    bumps, since you can't climb out of the saddle on a recumbent. Get
    rid of the shock absorber and your body will have to absorb all the
    shock instead.

    If you want to replace the shock with a metal bar, just get a metal
    bar about 1/2" thick (or whatever matches your shock) about the length
    of the shock and drill two holes in it.

    Not only that, but the mounting bolts will undergo far more stress than when
    it had the shock, even when it was pumped up rigid. Even worse, the bent
    has far more weight on the rear than an upright, putting lots more stress on
    the shock mount. Using a block that's much wider than the prior shock mount
    would be a good idea, else the mounting bolts may yield and fracture.

    All in all, this sounds like a bad idea.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  6. Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 17 May 2005 23:22:11 -0700, Steve Knight

    Quoted message said:

    If you switch to a bar, you may have to find a machine shop
    to get something the right length and strength that will
    attach to your particular shock mounts.

    I figured all I would need to do is take the shock in and have them make a
    shaft. but then what do I do without it while they are doing that (G) but if
    something was pre made it would be easier.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.


  7. Quoted message said:

    They have two stage compression, allowing a stable platform for pedalling
    and open up for bigger hits.
    There are other versions now too - they're quite common in the MB world.

    but a really good shock is spendy. I just can't afford to spend that money. the
    lack of a shock is not that big of a deal to me.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.


  8. Quoted message said:

    If the thing slams into holes when you pump it up until it doesn't
    work any more, what makes you think that replacing it with a metal bar
    will change that situation?


    it slams into holes because there is no control on the return force. no controls
    to slow down the return rate.
    going into a hole without it is not a big deal.

    Quoted message said:

    The idea behind the shock is to keep from jarring you when you hit
    bumps, since you can't climb out of the saddle on a recumbent. Get
    rid of the shock absorber and your body will have to absorb all the
    shock instead.

    yes but it is not that big of a deal I did not buy the bike for the shock but
    that it felt good to ride. I don't have a problem living without the shock. it
    would be fine if I could afford a really good shock. but I just can't see
    spending 300 for one.

    Quoted message said:


    If you want to replace the shock with a metal bar, just get a metal
    bar about 1/2" thick (or whatever matches your shock) about the length
    of the shock and drill two holes in it.


    it needs to have machined holes and flats to work well it needs to be accurately
    fitted. length is not the critical thing it's the holes. I don't want to mess up
    the mounts.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

  9. Steve Knight said:

    Anyone know of a bar to replace a shock on my suspension bent? It uses a
    standard shock. I find that if I have enough air in it to get rid of the pedal
    bounce the rear wheel slams down into all holes very hard. I am about 210 but I
    need about 250psi in it to keep the bounce down. If I have about 100 or so PSI
    the bounce is gone and no slamming and the lack of the shock is not that big of
    a deal.
    I don't want to have to spend 300.00 or so for a good shock that would let me
    control the problems. So if I could remove the shock and just replace it with a
    spacer that would be good. Save some weight too.

    Go to Walmart and buy a $89 Huffy or Murray with a rear coil shock.
    Those things are hard as rocks and compress very little. Swap out the
    shocks and your golden!

    NC

    --

    Let the bridges I burn light my way...

  10. On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:33:08 -0400, "Phil,
    Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    I don't get it. Aren't bents immune from pedal bob from the getgo?

    [snip]

    Dear Phil,

    Have a look at this recumbent pedal-kickback (pogo effect)
    suspension calculator:

    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm

    On an upright with suspension, pedal bob is more a matter of
    the rider stomping up and down on the pedals and the
    suspension bobbing in reaction to vertical forces.

    On a recumbent with suspension, pedal kickback is more a
    matter of the rider pushing horizontally on the pedals and
    the tightening chain pulling the two halves of the frame
    together.

    Carl Fogel

  11. Why not just put 500 PSI in there? That would simulate a metal bar
    pretty well.

  12. sunderland said:

    Why not just put 500 PSI in there? That would simulate a metal bar
    pretty well.

    Dear S.,

    Unfortunately, 500 psi would also extend the shock to its
    upright in-flight position preparatory to landing.

    The original poster may not desire a recumbent that imitates
    a hot-rod with jacked-up rear suspension.

    That much pressure might also lead to failure and deflation,
    whereupon the recumbent might switch to imitating a
    low-rider.

    Carl Fogel

  13. Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:33:08 -0400, "Phil,
    Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    I don't get it. Aren't bents immune from pedal bob from the getgo?

    [snip]

    Dear Phil,

    Have a look at this recumbent pedal-kickback (pogo effect)
    suspension calculator:

    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm

    On an upright with suspension, pedal bob is more a matter of
    the rider stomping up and down on the pedals and the
    suspension bobbing in reaction to vertical forces.

    On a recumbent with suspension, pedal kickback is more a
    matter of the rider pushing horizontally on the pedals and
    the tightening chain pulling the two halves of the frame
    together.

    Your explanation made a lot more sense than the link did. Thanks.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  14. On Wed, 18 May 2005 17:30:43 -0400, "Phil,
    Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:33:08 -0400, "Phil,
    Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    I don't get it. Aren't bents immune from pedal bob from the getgo?

    [snip]

    Dear Phil,

    Have a look at this recumbent pedal-kickback (pogo effect)
    suspension calculator:

    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm

    On an upright with suspension, pedal bob is more a matter of
    the rider stomping up and down on the pedals and the
    suspension bobbing in reaction to vertical forces.

    On a recumbent with suspension, pedal kickback is more a
    matter of the rider pushing horizontally on the pedals and
    the tightening chain pulling the two halves of the frame
    together.

    Your explanation made a lot more sense than the link did. Thanks.

    Dear Phil,

    Below its calculator, the Kreuzotter link does explain
    things:

    "Chain tension generates a torque upon the swingarm, if
    pedal kick back is different from zero, because only then
    the chain is able to "pull" the swingarm to a different
    angle."

    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/eschwinge.htm

    It may be a bit Germanic in phrasing, but the main point is
    there. It's a recumbent site, so you can't expect much fuss
    about uprights, in which the main pedal force is exerted
    downward, not horizontally.

    Incidentally, the recumbent suspension bobbing is pretty
    much a matter of the frame hunching up like an earthworm
    each time that the the rider pushes hard against the pedal.

    On an upright, this chain-tightening effect is overwhelmed
    by the downward force of the rider's leg thrust--the
    suspension squashes and spreads out instead of rising up.

    Carl Fogel


  15. Quoted message said:

    Go to Walmart and buy a $89 Huffy or Murray with a rear coil shock.
    Those things are hard as rocks and compress very little. Swap out the
    shocks and your golden!

    (G) except for the weight added (G)

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.


  16. Quoted message said:


    Unfortunately, 500 psi would also extend the shock to its
    upright in-flight position preparatory to landing.

    The original poster may not desire a recumbent that imitates
    a hot-rod with jacked-up rear suspension.

    (G)

    Quoted message said:

    That much pressure might also lead to failure and deflation,
    whereupon the recumbent might switch to imitating a
    low-rider.

    I tried it with no air and I got a weird kind of pedal bop not sure if I was
    moving or not, it jut felt strange.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

  17. Steve Knight said:
    Quoted message said:


    Unfortunately, 500 psi would also extend the shock to its
    upright in-flight position preparatory to landing.

    The original poster may not desire a recumbent that imitates
    a hot-rod with jacked-up rear suspension.

    (G)

    Quoted message said:

    That much pressure might also lead to failure and deflation,
    whereupon the recumbent might switch to imitating a
    low-rider.

    I tried it with no air and I got a weird kind of pedal bop not sure if I was
    moving or not, it jut felt strange.

    Dear Steve,

    With no air, a recumbent with rear suspension should hunch
    up just as much or even worse under slow, heavy pedal
    forces.

    Empty air-shock suspension would offer almost no resistance.

    The frame would be sagged as flat as it can go.

    So each time the chain tries to pull the rear sprocket and
    the front sprocket together, the two halves would hinge
    upward at the pivot point.

    A solid bar replacing the shock would eliminate this by
    locking the two frame halves--no more hunching up like an
    inchworm.

    As others have pointed out, the solid bar replacement might
    end up breaking the mounting points--the frame was
    presumably designed for a shock absorber to cushion impacts.

    Carl Fogel

  18. "Steve Knight" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    They have two stage compression, allowing a stable platform for pedalling
    and open up for bigger hits.
    There are other versions now too - they're quite common in the MB world.

    but a really good shock is spendy. I just can't afford to spend that
    money. the
    lack of a shock is not that big of a deal to me.

    Fair enough.

  19. "Steve Knight" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Go to Walmart and buy a $89 Huffy or Murray with a rear coil shock.
    Those things are hard as rocks and compress very little. Swap out the
    shocks and your golden!

    (G) except for the weight added (G)

    IMHO Lightweight is overrated. Most of us should take pounds off ourselves
    before we worry about the weight of the bike.

    NC


  20. Quoted message said:

    IMHO Lightweight is overrated. Most of us should take pounds off ourselves
    before we worry about the weight of the bike.

    I am doing both. but my bent is about 37 pounds it needs a diet too (G)

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
    Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
    See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.