In article <[email hidden]>,
Tim Mullin said:"benjo maso" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:Jan doesn't deserve to win.
One has to wonder how history will the current era of cycling. What esteem
will Armstrong's accomplishment be held in? Will his dominace be seen as
testament to his greatness, or as a product of the mediocrity of his
competitors? Merckx had to beat Zoetemelk and Thevenet, both eventual winners
of the TdF (and also the Vuelta for Joop). Hinault had Lemond and Fignon to
contend with, neither a stranger to the top step of the Tour Podium. So who
has Armstrong beaten? As much as I like Ullrich, his `97 victory has always
seemed something of a fluke. Beyond that, has he ever shown the talent of a
Zoetemelk or Lemond? Pantani had the potential of greatness, but by the time
he faced Armstrong in 2000, he was but a shadow of the rider he was in `98.
Don't get me wrong. I believe there are a good number of very good riders out
there. Indeed, one of the interesting things seems to be the overall quality
of the riders these days. But I can't help but think there is no really great
talent out there.
I think that Armstrong's dominance will be seen by cycling afficionados
as a product of his singleminded focus on the Tour, but by the general
public as a sign of his superiority. I agree with what you said, but I was
curious what it was about '97 that makes Ullrich's win seen flukey to you.
Jan seemed plenty strong the year before, so his ability wasn't a huge
surprise. Riis seemed like he should have been strong enough to win again,
but for whatever reason, he just didn't have the same legs. But there were
a few other riders that year who stood a chance (albeit some only had an
outside chance): Dufaux, Jaskula, Zulle, Leblanc, Berzin (yeah, he was on
the downhill side of things), Olano and Escartin. By the way, some good (or
amusing) assessments of the riders here:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/results/archives/tour97/tdfteams97.html
As for great riders, I think that Valverde has shown the potential to be
a great. Whether he can maintain his versatility and step up to winning a
GT or not is a question. (Of course, that presumes that winning a GT is the
definitition of "great".) I admit he's been pretty quiet this year.
--
tanx,
Howard
Butter is love.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?