Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

New integrated pipe-spindle bottom bracket - Thoughts?

Started by Wasatch5k · · Last activity · 4 posts · 633 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 June 2005
Last activity
30 June 2005
Original author
Wasatch5k
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
633
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anybody try these yet? I read Peter's post about his impressions of the
    FSA setup. I'm a little more interested in the performance and
    durability of the Shimano and RaceFace units.

    My cheap ISIS crankset ($79) is on its last leg and I'm wondering if I
    should go back to the square taper (old reliable) or try out one of
    these new things. The design looks intriguing.

    -nc

  2. Wasatch5k said:

    Anybody try these yet? I read Peter's post about his impressions of the
    FSA setup. I'm a little more interested in the performance and
    durability of the Shimano and RaceFace units.

    My cheap ISIS crankset ($79) is on its last leg and I'm wondering if I
    should go back to the square taper (old reliable) or try out one of
    these new things. The design looks intriguing.

    -nc

    We have sold a few and as an answer to the small bearing issues for
    ISIS and Octalink, A GOOD solution. But as an 'answer' to the square
    taper and bigger bearing balls of things like the Campag BB...it is
    not. Square taper for Campag, anyway, is NOT flexy, heavy or prone to
    breakage..Glad to see for at least another year, Campag is sticking
    with this tried and truew method of hooking a crank to a BB spindle. In
    fact, NEW BBs are coming down for Centaur and Veloce. Lighter, better.

    As an aside. We have installed two Gossamer cranks per instuctions and
    torque, and they came loose....hope we are not going to see future
    problems with these.

    Second aside, Campagnolo carbon compacts have come down in price to the
    point of being competative with FSA with MUCH better BBs and rings.

  3. I replaced a ISIS BB and cranks with the Race Face X-Type and
    absolutley could not be happier.

    I ride year round 2-3 times a week rain or shine and ride hard. Drops,
    gaps, etc. I ride The Shore and Whistler on a regular basis. I have
    not had to do anything with the BB or cranks in 6 months of riding and
    things are still really tight.

    I am not sure if you are wanting a road set or Mtn set, but I can tell
    you without a doubt that the X-Type (External bearing system) works
    very very well.

  4. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    Second aside, Campagnolo carbon compacts have come down in price to the
    point of being competative with FSA with MUCH better BBs and rings.

    IRD has a cf crankset that uses Campy bb now too. It's not difficult
    to improve on FSA chainrings. The Campy CT Record compact front
    derailleur is a disgrace to the Campy line. Maybe it works properly
    ONLY with Campy chainrings.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.