In article <[email hidden]>,
(Carole) said:Orac <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>,
(Jan) said:>From: [email hidden]
Quoted message said:>>you barely know where the colon IS..
>
Oh, sure he does -- it's where he keeps his head most of the time.
Auto-intoxication" -- getting drunk in your car. Carole may do this
frequently; it would explain her postings.
Gee, you're not just a spammer -- you're a lying spammer. You sell
the ginseng that just coincidentally happens to be the subject of your
"free seminar." You [censored].
One notes that Carole still hasn't produced evidence to support her
claim that 90% of chronic ill health is caused by a "toxic colon" or
that chronic disease is caused by "autointoxication," much less even
defined what the hell it is they mean.
What sort of "evidence" would you like? The evidence is that there are
complementary treatments that are effective.
What specific evidence? Effective in treating what specific conditions?
Quoted message said:
What I will say is that there are nutritional methods for treating
common complaints that never get mentioned by conventional medicine.
This is all tied up with the concept of nature cure.
Auto-intoxication is otherwise known as self-poisoning from my
understanding.
The body is well-equipped to rid itself of the "toxins" caused from
oxidative phosphorylation and other bodily processes.
Quoted message said:This is where the normal body processes of digestion
and cell metabolisation of food, result in waste products - this is
perfectly logical to anybody.
Notice that rarely, if ever, does an altie tell us which SPECIFIC
"toxins" cause which specific disease, nor do they ever tell us which
specific toxin their "treatment" removes. They almost always speak only
vaguely of unspecified "toxins."
Quoted message said:These waste products are usually
eliminated through the normal organs of elimination but certain
conditions can obviously hinder the process - including faulty
nutrition, overloading the system, stress, fatigue, emotional
problems. My hypothesis is the body heals itself if provided with the
correct environment - and all without pharmaceutical drugs. Prove me
wrong.
It is not up to me to "prove you wrong." You made an assertion that the
body heals itself if provided with the "correct" environment. The burden
of proof to back up that assertion is therefore on you. It is therefore
up to you to prove yourself correct. It is also incumbent upon you to
define what the "correct" environment is.
But if you really want to be proven wrong, I'll start with one condition
that can't be cured by your methods. Severe gangrene is a condition that
no amount of environmental manipulation or nutritional therapies is
going to heal. It needs antibiotics and surgery to either debride the
dead tissue or to amputate the gangrenous limb. Period.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"