Paul Hobson <[email hidden]> wrote:
:> Roger Zoul wrote:
:>> Bill Henry <[email hidden]> wrote:
:>> :> bjorn wrote:
:>> :>> You've got to be 19 or 20 years old to do this !
:>> :>
:>> :> Oh, it's insane, and they're probably going even crazier since
:>> :> there's a camera around.
:>> :>
:>> :> But I do find that I see things a lot better on a bike than I
:>> :> would
:>> :> off it, and actually feel safer at times, plus I take up less
:>> :> space
:>> :> and can avoid a lot of accidents. Still, you won't see me going
:>> :> the wrong way down 5th Avenue any time soon.
:>>
:>> I just have a hard time with the guy riding while carrying the
:>> camera on his helmet...I mean, he was taking some pretty tight
:>> spaces without ever looking to the side....I just can't see how
:>> that's possible. I know in several places he intentionally turns
:>> his head, but in those tight and quick spots, it just seems
:>> impossible....
:>>
:>
:> Two things:
:> 1) You can see a lot just be moving your eyes, which is good
:> because...
Interesting. Did you notice how steady the cam is in that video. I find it
amazing...
2) You almost always go where you (turn your head
:> to)look. When you're squeezing between cars, looking at the car
:> means you'll hit the car.
I guess that makes sense when you're moving that fast....but what if you
can't fit through some space?
:> It's just like skiing/snowboarding. The only people who hit trees on
:> the slope are the ones who are looking at them (trust me, I learned
:> the hardway!!).
So, does this mean one is better off with eyes closed if a tree is ahead?
🙂