OK, right out the gate I feel constrained to state that I did not
circumcise my sons. I might as well explain that I am convinced that
circumcision is stupid, cruel, and totally unnecessary.
Please explain to me why you think that depriving a boy of his right to
freely choose *adult* circumcision is a good idea. You see, I am not
against circumcision altogether. I feel that if an adult male wishes to
mutilate his own penis, that he should have the right to do so. After
all, it's his body. What bugs me is depriving infant boys of their
right to exercise that choice, before they even know what they are
missing.
Does that make sense?