Road Cycling · Public discussion

start-line blood tests?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 17 posts · 733 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
10 October 2005
Last activity
12 October 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
733
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

  2. Quoted message said:

    This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

    What does "whloe" mean?

    Thanks,

    Magilla

  3. MagillaGorilla said:
    Quoted message said:


    What does "whloe" mean?
    Thanks,


    Wyh do yuo aks?

  4. Quoted message said:

    This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

    Well, there are a lot of veins to look at. If you get a good
    phlebotomist, there won't be much of a mark.

    Steve

    Quoted message said:
  5. Steve Bornfeld said:
    Quoted message said:

    This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

    Well, there are a lot of veins to look at. If you get a good
    phlebotomist, there won't be much of a mark.

    Steve

    Do you know how large a gauge needle is needed to quickly and safely
    transfuse packed cells?

    18 gauge is suggested. Those are not small, and would show a mark for about
    a day.

    -jet

  6. Jet said:
    Steve Bornfeld said:


    Quoted message said:

    This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

    Well, there are a lot of veins to look at. If you get a good
    phlebotomist, there won't be much of a mark.

    Steve

    Do you know how large a gauge needle is needed to quickly and safely
    transfuse packed cells?

    18 gauge is suggested. Those are not small, and would show a mark for about
    a day.

    -jet

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    Quoted message said:
  7. Steve Bornfeld said:
    Jet said:
    Steve Bornfeld said:


    [email hidden] wrote:

    > This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    > there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    > race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    > seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

    Well, there are a lot of veins to look at. If you get a good
    phlebotomist, there won't be much of a mark.

    Steve

    Do you know how large a gauge needle is needed to quickly and safely
    transfuse packed cells?

    18 gauge is suggested. Those are not small, and would show a mark for
    about
    a day.

    -jet

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

  8. MagillaGorilla said:
    Quoted message said:

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30
    ga. needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even
    routine IV lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

    Holy smoke--have you ever seen an amnio needle? The freakin' thing
    looks like a harpoon. My wife didn't seem to mind...much.
    I sometimes use a 30 ga. In school, they had us using 25 ga all the
    time--so we could aspirate (we don't want to inject into an artery or
    vein). We were told that you couldn't aspirate effectively with a
    needle smaller than 25 ga. This was nonsense--I can aspirate blood very
    easily with a 27. But packed cells are something else again. I don't
    doubt what jet said about needing an 18. But when I watched my wife's
    anmio, the needle looked like it might be negative numbers.

    Steve

  9. Steve Bornfeld said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do you know how large a gauge needle is needed to quickly and safely
    transfuse packed cells?

    18 gauge is suggested. Those are not small, and would show a mark for about
    a day.

    -jet

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    Huh? The extremely thin needle that is used for insulin injections is a 27
    (sometimes a 31)....or are you talking about the needle for injecting
    novocaine.

    (If you're putting in IV solutions, like sodium brevital with a needle that
    small it would take you all day, heh.)

    Just to remind you, since blood is a solid suspended in a liquid, the gauge
    has to be pretty large so as not to hemolyze the cells - turbulence and
    soforth complicates it. You -might- get away with a 20 gauge for whole
    blood infused slowly.

    Regular IV solutions could be given though any size needle if you're
    talking crystalloid, like Sodium Chloride solution, or D5W. They usually
    use a 20, or 22. For infants, sometimes they use a scalp vein, even as
    small as 23 gauge for blood, but it's infused diluted and very slowly.

    But yeah, it should be pretty easy to find a vein on those thin-skinned
    lycra-wearers, eh? But you said 'perineal veins'. Are you sure about that?

    -jet

  10. On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:47:17 -0400, MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

    Larger values mean smaller diameter. 16 gauge needle is quite large, and is
    used for blood donation.

    27gauge needle is that used for insulin injections - it's tiny.

    The gauge is not related to the 'length'.

    -jet

  11. Quoted message said:

    This whloe issue of start-line blood tests. Here's my question, if
    there is such widespread practice of transfusing blood just before the
    race begins, wouldn't the riders all be suffering from track-marks and
    seriously damaged veins? Blood vessels are not THAT resilient.

    Paging Emma O'Reilly....

  12. Jet said:
    Steve Bornfeld said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do you know how large a gauge needle is needed to quickly and safely
    transfuse packed cells?

    18 gauge is suggested. Those are not small, and would show a mark for about
    a day.

    -jet

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    Huh? The extremely thin needle that is used for insulin injections is a 27
    (sometimes a 31)....or are you talking about the needle for injecting
    novocaine.

    (If you're putting in IV solutions, like sodium brevital with a needle that
    small it would take you all day, heh.)

    Just to remind you, since blood is a solid suspended in a liquid, the gauge
    has to be pretty large so as not to hemolyze the cells - turbulence and
    soforth complicates it. You -might- get away with a 20 gauge for whole
    blood infused slowly.

    Regular IV solutions could be given though any size needle if you're
    talking crystalloid, like Sodium Chloride solution, or D5W. They usually
    use a 20, or 22. For infants, sometimes they use a scalp vein, even as
    small as 23 gauge for blood, but it's infused diluted and very slowly.

    But yeah, it should be pretty easy to find a vein on those thin-skinned
    lycra-wearers, eh? But you said 'perineal veins'. Are you sure about that?

    -jet

    I exaggerate to clarify. Just wondering where you'd look for a vein if
    you didn't want anyone to find the veinipuncture.

    Steve

    Quoted message said:

    --
    {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0
    Arial;}}
    {\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove
    "nospam" to reply\par
    }

  13. Jet said:

    On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:47:17 -0400, MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

    Larger values mean smaller diameter. 16 gauge needle is quite large, and is
    used for blood donation.

    27gauge needle is that used for insulin injections - it's tiny.

    The gauge is not related to the 'length'.

    -jet

    I'm aware of that. I think I've seen insulin syringes, and the needles
    are very fine bore--maybe 30 ga. We use 30 ga for infiltration
    anesthesia, but 27 ga for our other injections. In school we used 25
    ga. They say that since these are single-use needles and therefore
    presumably very sharp it really doesn't make it more painful to use a
    larger bore needle.

    Steve

    Quoted message said:

    --
    {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0
    Arial;}}
    {\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove
    "nospam" to reply\par
    }

  14. Jet said:

    On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:47:17 -0400, MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?

    Steve

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

    Larger values mean smaller diameter. 16 gauge needle is quite large, and is
    used for blood donation.

    27gauge needle is that used for insulin injections - it's tiny.

    The gauge is not related to the 'length'.

    -jet

    Nobody uses 16 gauge needles, and diabetics use 25g, not 27. Let me
    know if you need any further assistance.

    Thanks,

    Magilla

  15. Steven Bornfeld said:

    I exaggerate to clarify. Just wondering where you'd look for a vein if
    you didn't want anyone to find the veinipuncture.

    Steve

    There's be two criterions. The vein would have to support transfusion of
    blood (not collapse when you tried to stick it), and be a decent diameter.
    I'd choose the vein on the basis of it being able to repeatedly support
    transfusion over visibility of the venipuncture.

    For one thing, is it not typical that racer get saline and other legal
    products? If so, why cover it up.

    I would probably be aware of not having the public easily be able to
    identify vp scars, nor have band aids on both arms at race time, etc. So
    I'd use a concealer, or long sleeves. I wouldn't go to transfusing in the
    legs. Too much danger of phlebitis, blood clot formation, istm. Back of the
    hand would be an option, but those are harder to stick. Also to get the
    vein up, you'd have to use a place that would allow a tourniquet.

    After all, we're not talking heroin users here, injecting between the toes,
    man. ;-)

    -jet

  16. On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:31:21 -0400, MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Jet said:

    On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:47:17 -0400, MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    > Good point. I'm pretty clueless about this. I assumed the packed
    >cells were reconstituted before transfusing.
    > In any case, a bum of a phlebotomist will leave a mark with a 30 ga.
    >needle (I generally use a 27 ga. at work; I'm guessing even routine IV
    >lines are running on considerably larger needles.
    > Still, who's gonna check all those perineal veins?
    >
    >Steve
    >

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

    Larger values mean smaller diameter. 16 gauge needle is quite large, and is
    used for blood donation.

    27gauge needle is that used for insulin injections - it's tiny.

    The gauge is not related to the 'length'.

    -jet

    Nobody uses 16 gauge needles,

    Ever donated blood? That's a 16 ga.

    Quoted message said:

    and diabetics use 25g, not 27.

    It varies. Do a websearch.

    http://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/article.cfm?AID=327&SID=2&SK=9AAD&SSL=n&TID=42&page=3

    "Injecting Insulin 101
    by Eve Gehling, M.Ed., R.D., C.D.E.
    Published in the September/October 2000 issue.
    Needle gauges range between 27 and 31. The higher the gauge, the thinner
    the needle. Pick a needle gauge that feels most comfortable for you."

    HTH.

    Quoted message said:

    Let me know if you need any further assistance.

    Fire your research staff?

    -jet

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks,

    Magilla

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Steven Bornfeld said:
    Jet said:

    On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:47:17 -0400, MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    27 ga. needles? What do you do with that - amniocentisis?

    Magilla

    Larger values mean smaller diameter. 16 gauge needle is quite large, and is
    used for blood donation.

    27gauge needle is that used for insulin injections - it's tiny.

    The gauge is not related to the 'length'.

    -jet

    I'm aware of that. I think I've seen insulin syringes, and the needles
    are very fine bore--maybe 30 ga. We use 30 ga for infiltration
    anesthesia, but 27 ga for our other injections. In school we used 25
    ga. They say that since these are single-use needles and therefore
    presumably very sharp it really doesn't make it more painful to use a
    larger bore needle.

    Just as a data point, I checked my cat's insulin needles. 28 ga.

    Yes, I have a diabetic cat. What I really want to know is why don't more
    pros use infirm pets as excuses? Surely David Millar could have scared
    up an anemic dog or something....

    I'm kidding! Well, no, my cat really is diabetic.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.